Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
“It is a fundamental Sixth Amendment right that defendants are entitled to ‘a fair trial’ by a panel of ‘impartial, indifferent’ jurors,’” ...(Bost v. United States, 178 A.3d 1156, 1176-77 [D.C. 2018] quoting Welch v. United States, 466 A.2d 829, 834 [D.C. 1983] quoting Irvin v. Dowd , 366 U.S. 717, 722 [1961]), “and ordinarily a change of venue is ‘an appropriate remedy’ ‘[w]hen a threat to this constitutional protection is posed ....’” (Id.)
“However, because the Superior Court of the District of Columbia ‘sits as a single unitary judicial district,’ a change of venue is not available in the District of Columbia. (Id., citing United States v. Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321, 1345 [D.C. 1981].)
“Accordingly, we have said that the trial court's denial of a motion for a change of venue is ‘required.’” (Bost v. United States, 178 A.3d 1156, 1176-77 [D.C. 2018] quoting id.) “Because it is a ‘fundamental’ rule in our jurisdiction that ‘no division of this court will overrule a prior decision of this court...’” (Bost v. United States, 178 A.3d 1156, 1176-77 [D.C. 2018] quoting Washington v. Guest Servs., Inc., 718 A.2d 1071, 1075 [D.C. 1998] quoting M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310, 312 [D.C. 1971].)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.