Sorted by relevance. You can also sort by date.
Request to Dismiss Class Allegations Plaintiff has moved to dismiss the class action allegations in his complaint, without prejudice, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.770(a). As the Court reads rule 3.770 in its entirety, dismissal of any party to a class action, even if the class action has not yet been certified, requires court approval. However, Plaintiff has already filed a Request for Dismissal, with prejudice, as to his individual claims, which has been entered by the clerk. Procedurally, the case seems to have already been dismissed, albeit not in accordance
NATURE OF PROCEEDING: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS RICHARD MEAD WHIPPO, SCOTT DHANJAL AND SCOTT ROGALSKI'S CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS TENTATIVE RULING: On the Court's own motion, this matter is continued to January 12, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. in Department 9.
LdAN o TLHNO IE2O ARTi PmrLSE1HNACI ;n 3eSAI3In . LouMAIeOn3A , U : IA oTtpNSOiASIO CF O taNnSsSYFC .TtLTIN mPE0IFQi ;T AtN&S T E:RaACCt9EarOcIm JWCtMi:TE9neSP,SCrTVRDT SRuIAy ODe Po& SNELA iM#sh GOE MUIRRROOUTDVCoE tLEAEpR2SA R#oLPTNT.wrT,ESOTIO SI9LDDmGO T LR GTNEAn0FNtSNDA2DGNJOnOPH eDFAKAT huNRna7A1tPICIttMasL
ooayh nt.al afuthrrreO loo ibe ,er0heeo ,e7hi ae01 sporosaimp t1Lealyot(etdrei mnrtrlt. tru rgqagitcolhbt o ecrhP9drms6 aorea t eenoei0obac 6eCtud aaieo i43ctuhet urimac ttrgf5tt0tr ot t9avlnu alp utr guhv o )e gm peseee)e eet4:re .le sovhue C C4 amhcit deo rhb8uuyr taftethae5pnw t .gpaeaol a tD oree mescs e he/ cn tc -.dnsi 5 ceme(efrt tita9tiaea1 as ,ee sf5sae $n -hs0so07tEr mtt g rtR I un a ev ( yr)gieo n. buet tnuestmNetbfqnlatniccyhonao ho 46t4sne0revtl:needeis srh cstIses aldhdah tmo por8f oliu u0pci(i r6dfoum b rnP.n r.hot6T4r.rnoi:ffaoTl.pua mie shir)ird