Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

JOSE CARRILLO V. NEW BALANCE ATHLETICS, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of defendant New Balance Athletics, Inc. alleging overtime and wage statement violations. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on September 17, 2020. The factual and procedural backgro...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

LANCE DUTCHER V. GOOGLE LLC, D/B/A YOUTUBE, ET AL.

This is a putative class action arising from the automatic renewal of subscriptions for digital content offered by Defendants Google LLC, d/b/a YouTube and YouTube, LLC (“Defendants” or “YouTube”). Defendants demur to each cause of action in the operative Complaint for failure to state a claim (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (e)), and Plaintiff o...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

LATANYA SIMMONS, ET AL. V. APPLE INC., ET AL.

This is a putative consumer class action challenging Defendant Apple, Inc.’s actions in connection with marketing, advertising, and selling allegedly defective Powerbeats 2 and Powerbeats 3 headphones. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on August 7, 2020. The factual and procedur...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

AFSHAR V. SAHER, ET AL.

Defendant Orchard School District (the “District” or “Defendant”) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by plaintiff Reza Afshar (“Plaintiff”). I. Background A. Factual This action arises out of sexual abuse purported suffered by Plaintiff when he was a child by his school teacher. According to the allegations of the FAC, ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING

& Sewer Service, Inc. According to the allegations of the complaint, plaintiff South Bay Piping Industry Labor Management Trust (“Plaintiff”) is a joint labor-management committee established pursuant to the federal Labor Management Cooperation Act of 1978 (Section 175a of Title 29 of the United States Code). (See complaint, ¶ 4.) Plaintiff, th...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

BELCHER, ET AL. V. DAKOTA NOTE LLC, ET AL.

According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (“TAC”), in May 2015, plaintiffs Gregory Belcher (“Belcher”) and Vilasni Ganesh (“Ganesh”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), met defendant Derald Kenoyer (“Kenoyer”), who introduced himself as a licensed home loan mortgage broker with defendant California Home Loans aka Capital Funding (“CHL”)...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL.

-3 According to the allegations of the cross- complaint (“XC”), cross-complainant and defendant GenapSys, Inc. (“Genapsys”) developed industry disruptive DNA sequencing technology, investing over a hundred million dollars and over a decade in developing that technology. (See XC, ¶¶ 19-22.) In May 2017, cross-defendants Foresite Capital Manageme...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. MORTGAGE LENDER SERVICES

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20CV369368 Rabindra Chakraborty, Ruma Chakraborty v. Mortgage Lender Services, Inc. DATE...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. BELLA VISTA APARTMENTS

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. 18CV340085 Maryam Gholamirad v. Bella Vista Apartments, et al. DATE: 21 January 2021 TIME: 9:...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. NORTHBOUND LLCDATE JANUARY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 17CV314755 Subohip Mukherjee v. Northbound LLC DATE: 21 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. KAMAL KAPADIA

Kamal Kapadia, Perviz Kapadia, et al DATE: 21 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 8 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing pa...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. RABINDRA N CHAKRABORTY

Rabindra N. Chakraborty, IOTIED, Inc. et al. DATE: 21 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 1 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opp...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

CITY PARK AT SUNNYVALE OWNERS' ASSOCIATION V. TOLL BROS., INC., ET AL.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 CITY PARK AT SUNNYVALE OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual 13 benefit corporation, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 Plaintiff, JUDGMENT/ADJUDICATION; MOTION FOR SUMMARY 15 vs. ADJUDICATION 16 TOLL BROS., INC., a Pennsylvania corporation; TOLL CA VII, L.P., a California limited 17 partn...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

ORR V. PETVET CARE CENTERS (CALIFORNIA), INC., ET AL.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 AMY ROYSE ORR, an individual, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 16 INC., a Delaware corporation; PETVET CARE CENTERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability 17 company; PETVET CARE CENTERS, INC., a ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

IN RE MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION

This putative class action arises from alleged misrepresentations and omissions in the Offering Materials governing the October 2017 transaction by which Defendant Maxar Technologies, Inc.,9 a satellite manufacturer, acquired and merged with DigitalGlobe, Inc., a satellite imagery company (the “Merger”). Before the Court is a demurrer by Maxar and ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

RAUL ACEVES, ET AL. V. LEGACY PARTNERS, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of Defendant Legacy Partners, Inc. (“LP”). Plaintiffs allege wage and hour violations arising from LP’s “On-Call Policy.” Before the Court is LP’s petition to compel arbitration, which Plaintiffs oppose. As discussed below, the Court DENIES LP’s petition. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual As...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

YOUNG, ET AL. V. TSAI, ET AL.

This is an action for legal malpractice. In 2019, plaintiff Kevin Young (“Young”), the owner of plaintiff corporation ABC Wholesale, Inc. (“ABC”) (collectively with Young, “Plaintiffs”), contacted defendants Judy Chi-Dee-Tsai and the Law Office of Judy Tsai (collectively, “Defendants”), the attorney for ABC, regarding the sale of ABC. (See complain...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

AUDYCKI V. STANFORD HEALTH CARE

20CV365879) This is an action involving the consolidation of three putative class actions for wage and hour claims. On May 1, 2019, plaintiff Lillian Audycki (“Audycki”) filed a class action complaint against defendant Stanford Health Care (“SHC” or “Defendant”), asserting a single cause of action for violation of Labor Code section 226, allegi...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

JERKOVICH V. AZZARELLO, ET AL.

Defendant/cross-complainant Donna Kinsella (“Kinsella”) moves for summary adjudication in her favor on claims asserted in the complaint (“Complaint”) filed by plaintiff/cross-defendant Patricia Jerkovich (“Jerkovich”). I. Background A. Factual This action arises out of a dispute between the owners of commercial properties in San Jose. A...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. BPR PROPERTIES PETALUMA

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 19CV345239 HM Construction, Inc. vs BPR Properties Petaluma, LLC DATE: 14 January 2021 T...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ETC

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20PR188917 In the Matter of Aubree Rullamas DATE: 14 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUM...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

HTTP://WWW.SCSCOURT.ORG

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20CV366593 Tsuyoshi Salsbery v. Michael Brando DATE: 14 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 6 This matter will b...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

(FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY)

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org () CASE NO.: 20CV367468 Morgan Lewis-Pastor vs Diane Schneider DATE: 14 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 8 This ma...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. SU NGUYENDATE JANUARY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 19CV356354 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. vs Su Nguyen DATE: 14 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. SICMOUNTAIN BAY PLAZA

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20CV372914 Pure Storage, Inc. et al vs Sic-Mountain Bay Plaza, LLC et al DATE: 14 Januar...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 78     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.