Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

MILDRED LOUISE QUALLS VS LUXE NAIL SPA & SALON ET AL

MILDRED LOUISE QUALLS, Plaintiff, vs. LUXE NAIL SPA & SALON, et al., Defendants. CASE NO: BC592071 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Dept. 98 1:30 p.m. May 10, 2017 On August 21, 2015, Plaintiff Mildred Louise Qualls (“Plaintiff”) filed this action for alleged damages arising out of an April 10, 2014 sli...

  • Hearing

    May 10, 2017

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MELISSA ST CLAIR ET AL VS HEALTH NET OF CALIFORNIA INC ET AL

THE COURT HAS SIGNED THE STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE HEARING ON MEDPOINT'S GOOD FAITH MOTION TO TOMORROW....

  • Hearing

    Sep 27, 2019

JOSEPH BARTH VS. ADVANCED CLEANUP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET-AL

# 7. Barth vs. Advanced Cleanup Technologies, Inc. Case No.: TC026513 Matter on calendar for: Motion to add additional persons as judgment creditors Tentative ruling: This is an action for breach of contract and common counts, where Plaintiff Joseph Barth loaned Rubin Garcia $230,000. Garcia defaulted on the loan and this action was...

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2016

  • Judge

    Brian S. Currey or John A. Slawson

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

THANE CALLENDER PETZOLD VS SCOTT CORLESS, ET AL.

THE CMC IS CONTINUED TO 5/22/19 AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPT. 50. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO GIVE NOTICE. NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY ON MAY 13, 2019....

  • Hearing

    May 13, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

CALVIN GREENE VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTAT

calvin Greene, Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY, Defendant. Case No.: BC690992 Hearing Date: March 8, 2019 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion for judgment on the pleadings Background Plaintiff Calvin Greene (“Plaintiff”) alleges that he was riding the Blue Line train when it “jerk[ed] back and ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2019

LUIS CARLOS SANTOS RUIZ ET AL VS CHELSEA NICOLE DIDIER

Motion to Dismiss Action for Failure to Obey Court’s Order The court considered the motion. No opposition was filed. On August 25, 2017, plaintiffs Luis Carlos Santos Ruiz and Helen Nohemy Palenciacano filed a complaint against defendant Chelsea Nicole Didier for motor vehicle negligence based on a February 7, 2016 collision. Trial ...

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2018

EROL KOZOGLU ET AL VS CHILL SPOT INC ET AL

Erol Kozoglu, et al. v. Chill Spot, Inc., et al., BC 708632 Tentative decision on applications for writ of possession: granted in part Plaintiffs Erol Kozoglu (“Kozoglu”), Emabil Cooperation Limited, Inc. (“Emabil, Inc.”), and Emabil, LLC (“Emabil, LLC”) seek a writ of possession to recover ice cream equipment and inventory from Def...

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2018

JUAN ARREGUIN, ET AL. VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

Plaintiffs allege that there were various defects with the 2015 KIA Optima they leased, including a defective Theta II engine. Defendant Kia Motors America, Inc. demurs to First Amended Complaint and moves to strike portions thereof. TENTATIVE RULING Defendant Kia Motors America, Inc.’s demurrer to the First Amended Complaint is SUSTAIN...

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

THE BEE CONSTRUCTION VS WESTERN BUILT CONSTRUCTION INC

Defendant Casper Falls Investments, LLC’s Demurrer to the Complaint is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR AS MOOT. Plaintiff The Bee Construction (“Plaintiff”) filed the Complaint in this action against defendants Western Built Construction, Inc. and Casper Falls Investments, LLC (“Casper Falls”) on March 20, 2017. Plaintiff is entitled to amend at least o...

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

  • Judge

    Elaine Lu or Yolanda Orozco

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

NEIL SHEKHTER, ET AL., VS DENNIS J. WONG., ET AL.,

Case Name: Shekhter, et al. v. Wong, et al. Case No.: SC126760 Complaint Filed: 12/01/16 Hearing: 02/26/19 Motion C/O: Calendar #: Discovery C/O: Notice: OK Trial Date: Not Set _____________________________________________ SUBJECT: MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS MP: Defendants and Cross-Complainants SCRV SPE 1, LP,...

  • Hearing

    Feb 26, 2019

SAMI MATEKOHAN VS DAVID JAY YOUNG

MOVING PARTY: Defendant and cross-complainant David Young RESPONDING PARTY: None Motion to Compel Mental and Physical Examinations of Plaintiff The court considered the moving papers. BACKGROUND On November 13, 2015, plaintiff Sami Matekohan filed a complaint against defendant David Jay Young for negligence based on an incid...

  • Hearing

    Nov 22, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

SEVAG SALIBIAN ET AL VS BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION ET AL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT SEVAG SALIBIAN, ET AL.,, Plaintiff(s), vs. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendant(s). Case No.: BC685757 [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Dept. 3 1:30 p.m. December 17, 2019 1. Background Facts ...

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2019

THOMAS K CARTER VS BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 78 THOMAS K CARTER; Plaintiff, vs. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC., et al.; Defendants. Case No.: BC672416 Hearing Date: July 29, 2019 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Attorney Payam Shahian of Strategic Legal Practices, APC’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiff T...

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2019

REGINALD SANFORD VS LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER ET AL

Defendant Long Beach Memorial Center(“Defendant”) moves to compel Plaintiff Reginald Sanford (“Sanford”) to provide responses to Defendant’s Pretrial Interrogatories (Set One), Supplemental Interrogatories (Set One), Demand for Production and Inspection of Documents (Set Two), Supplemental Demand for Production of Documents (Set One), and Pretrial ...

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2016

RICHARD WEISBERGER VS STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY

RICHARD WEISBERGER, Plaintiff, vs. STARBUCK COFFEE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. CASE NO: BC625093 [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN PORTIONS OF COMPLAINT Dept. 98 1:30 p.m. November 14, 2016 On June 24, 2016, Plaintiff Richard Weisberger (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Starbucks ...

  • Hearing

    Nov 14, 2016

SAMEHESHA SHEFFIELD VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

samehesha sheffield, Plaintiff, v. county of los angeles, Defendant. Case No.: 19STCV03291 Hearing Date: September 10, 2019 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motions to compel discovery responses Defendant County of Los Angeles (“Defendant”) moves to compel responses from Plaintiff Samehesha Sheffield (“Plaintiff”) to: Form Interrogatories,...

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

EDWIN MINASSIAN VS MICHAEL PANOSIAN, ET AL

(1) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW ADMISSIONS (2) MOTION FOR RESTITUTION OF FUNDS PAID TO SATISFY A DEFAULT JUDGMENT Date: 6/22/20 (3:30 PM) Case: Edwin Minassian v. Michael Panosian et al. (EC065533) TENTATIVE RULING: I. BACKGROUND AND PRELIMINARY MATTERS On February 7, 2017, pursuant to plaintiff Edwin Minassian’s motion, th...

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

LAW OFFICES OF BARUCH C. COHEN VS. HILLAND, DONALD A

The Motion is CONTINUED to August 28, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 94. Counsel is ordered to properly serve and file Form MC-053 (Proposed Order) by August 14, 2018. The Court will not accept late-filed papers. Counsel to give notice. On June 5, 2018, Defendant Donald A. Hilland’s Counsel Armando M. Galvan (“Counsel”) filed a Motion to b...

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2018

  • Judge

    Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CHRISTOPHER TAYLOR VS CENTURY 21 REAL ESTATE LLC ET AL

The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice as to defendants David Gomez and Lorena Gamboa. Code Civ. Proc. § 581(g), 583.410(a), 583.420(a)(1). Plaintiff Christopher Taylor originally filed this action on June 5, 2014, approximately 2 years and four months ago, and this Court has no indication that these defendants have been se...

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

NICOLE STRATMAN, ET AL. VS ERNEST ORTIZ, ET AL.

Demurrer with a Motion to Strike Having considered the demurring, moving, opposing, and reply papers, the Court rules as follows. BACKGROUND On December 21, 2018, Plaintiffs Nicole Stratman, Brayden Witt, and David Welker (“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against Defendants Ernest Ortiz, Venice Family Clinic, and Venice Family Clinic Fou...

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

NATALIA CAROLINA PALACIOS VS ABRAHAM ACUNA ET AL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT NATALIA CAROLINA PALACIOS, Plaintiff(s), vs. ABRAHAM ACUNA, ET AL., Defendant(s). CASE NO: BC616299 [TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT Dept. 3 1:30 p.m. May 29, 2019 Background Facts Pla...

  • Hearing

    May 29, 2019

INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB VS BYRON A EC

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB, etc., Plaintiff, vs. BYRON A. ECHEVERRIA, et al., Defendants. CASE NO.: BC592069 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT JUDGMENT Date: June 22, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 ...

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

SONRISA SCOTT VS BRIAN CHRISTOPHER GANES ET AL

All parties should note that the time for the hearing on this motion has been moved to 10:00 am on October 10, 2018. Sonrisa Scott, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BRian Christopher GAnes, et al., Defendants. Case No.: BC664010 Hearing Date: October 10, 2018 [TENTATIVE] order RE: PLAINTIFFS’ motion for order compelling Defendant’S DE...

  • Hearing

    Oct 10, 2018

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

WEI SUN VS HENRY OU

On Petitioner’s RFO, filed October 25, 2016, the Court has the following Tentative Ruling: The RFO was served by mail on Respondent’s counsel 10-27-16, well within the time parameters set forth in CCP 1005(b). Respondent’s Responsive Declaration was not filed until December 5, 2016, when in fact CCP 1005(b) required its filing no later than...

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2016

MARIA PIMENTEL VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL

No tentative is issued at this time. Parties may submit on their pleadings or appear for argument and the Court will issue a written ruling. Evidentiary Objections Plaintiff’s objections nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are OVERRULED. Plaintiff’s objections are based on lack of foundation and hearsay. Plaintiff claims there is no foundation fo...

  • Hearing

    Feb 22, 2018

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.