1-25 of 30 results

TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORP., ET AL. VS. NETFLIX, INC.

Plaintiff's unopposed motion to continue trial is GRANTED to 9/30/19 at 10am; FSC is cont'd to 9/20/19 at 10am.

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2019

  • Type

    Contract - Tortious Interference (General Jurisdiction)

JAMES MULHEARN VS BRIAN FREEMAN

Defendant's Demurrer to the 5th Cause of Action (Negligence) to the First Amended Complaint is overruled. There is an allegation of duty: Full Stack was hired by Defendant to "service Heartbeat Technologies," to coordinate employee share buy-outs. See First Amended Complaint Paragraphs 70 and72. The hiring was intended to affect employees in Plaintiff's position. Further, it is alleged that Plaintiff asked Full Stack for assistance in exercising his share options and informed Defendant of his

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2018

  • Type

    Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)

SHEHADEH V. ORRICK JOINT VENTURE LP

Defendants Orrick Joint Venture, LP and Todd Cowing’s request for judicial notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, ¶ 452, subd. (d).) Defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees is GRANTED, in the amount of $61,119.50. (Civ. Code, ...

  • Hearing

    Sep 5, 2018

JONATHAN CODY YORK VS STUDIO AIR CONDITIONING ET AL

RUBI BENITEZ, Plaintiff(s), vs. MINDY KIM, ET AL., Defendant(s). CASE NO: BC547987 [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; PERMITTING MICHAEL CALEB MEYER TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE IN THIS ACTION Dept. 3 1:30 p.m. May 1, 2018 1. Prior Hearing On 3/21/18, the Court was scheduled to hear Defendant’s application to permit Michael Caleb Meyer to appear pro hac vice in this action. Prior to the hearing, the Court issued the following tentative ruling, which was adopted

  • Hearing

    May 1, 2018

  • Type

    Other PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)

UMB BANK, N.A. VS. ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE Matter on calendar for Friday, April 13, 2018, Line 8, PLAINTIFF UMB BANK, N.A.'S MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE. UMB Bank, N.A's motion to admit counsel pro hac vice is GRANTED. No opposition filed and good cause shown. The court will sign the proposed order. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to [email protected] with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative r

  • Hearing

    Apr 13, 2018

MASSOUD AFZAL VS SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO ET AL

Massoud Afzal v. Sears Roebuck and Co. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION MOVING PARTY: Defendants Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears Holdings Management Corporation RESPONDING PARTY(S): Plaintiff Massoud Afazal STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR PROCEEDINGS: This is an action to seek civil penalties pursuant to PAGA for wage and hour violations. Defendants Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears Holdings Management Corporation move to compel arbitration. TENTATIVE RULING: Defendants Sears, Roebuck a

  • Hearing

    Feb 21, 2018

  • Type

    Other Employment Complaint (General Jurisdiction)

CHEAP STUFF, INC ET AL VS MICROSOFT CORPORATION ET AL

3. Cheap Stuff, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation EC062557 Motion of cross-defendants Avi N. Bibi, Danny E. Bibi, Cheap Stuff, Inc., Ad.com, Interactive Media, Inc. and Local Pages, Inc. for Summary Adjudication (First Motion) is denied. The moving papers submit uncontroverted evidence that the Local Pages Agreement provides that if cross-defendants violate the Local Pages Agreement by displaying or distributing keyword advertisements of third party websites which have direct or indirect relati

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2017

  • Type

    Othr Breach Contr/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction)

MELVIN GLAPION VS KROLL ASSOCIATES INC ET AL

Defendant Kroll Associates, Inc.’s unopposed Motion to Seal Exhibits Filed in Support of Kroll’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication is GRANTED. Defendant provides the declaration of Daniel Karson, the Chairman of the Investigations and Disputes practice for the Americas at Kroll Associates. Karson states that Defendant maintains the confidentiality of employee personnel files. (Karson Decl. ¶¶ 3-4.) Additionally, this information is protected by a constit

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2017

  • Type

    Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)

KENNETH D MALAMED VS FIRST WESTERN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT COMPAN

NOTE TO COUNSEL:  THE TENTATIVE RULING ON THE MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE HEARING ON TUESDAY.

  • Hearing

    Sep 5, 2017

  • Type

    Declaratory Relief Only (General Jurisdiction)

BRAD D. GREENSPAN VS VANTAGEPOINT VENTURE ASSOCIATES IV

Motion of defendant TPG Capital, Inc. for sanctions under CCP § 128.7 is granted in part. The court finds that plaintiff was accorded the 21 day safe harbor provided for in section 128.7. The court further finds that under CCP § 128.7(b)(2) and (3), plaintiff and his counsel continued to advocate the thirteenth, fourteenth and sixteenth causes of action against moving defendant when the legal contentions asserted in those causes of action were devoid of any factual allegations against the movi

  • Hearing

    Jul 7, 2017

  • Type

    Petn to Comp/Conf Arbitration (General Jurisdiction)

ZHOEI M TEASLEY VS SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIO

At the hearing on May 18, 2017, the Court will allow defendant to cross-examine plaintiff regarding the declaration she signed on May 2, 2017. The Court orders plaintiff to be present, and to be ready to respond, both orally and with documentary evidence, to questions regarding the claims of financial hardship made in her declaration. (See Teasley Declaration, signed May 2, 2017, ¶¶ 3-5.) The Court also orders plaintiff to bring documentary evidence sufficient to show any money that she exp

  • Hearing

    May 18, 2017

  • Type

    Other Employment Complaint (General Jurisdiction)

LUDIE ACKERMAN VS CHICO'S FAS INC

NOTE:  PLEASE SUBMIT A SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION FROM THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR ATTACHING COPIES OF EVERYTHING THAT WAS SENT TO THE CLASS SO THE COURT CAN DETERMINE IF WHAT WAS ACTUALLY SENT OUT TO THE CLASS HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE THE COURT APPROVED THE NOTICE.SUBJECT TO THE ABOVE, THE FOLLOWING IS THE COURT'S TENTATIVE:

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2017

  • Type

    Other Employment Complaint (General Jurisdiction)

CESAR ROMERO ET AL VS PLS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INC ET AL

ROMERO v. PLS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION TO DENY CLASS CERTIFICATION TENTATIVE RULING Deny Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification as to class and subclass; Defendants’ motion to deny class certification is moot DISCUSSION I. Background Plaintiffs Cesar Romero, Antonio Solis, and Melvin Vanegas, former Store Managers, brought this putative wage-and-hour class action against their former employers, alleging they were misclassified as “exempt” emplo

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2017

  • Type

    Other Employment Complaint (General Jurisdiction)

KAN-DI-KI, LLC VS. EDGEWATER HEALTH CARE, INC.

10. EC064967 KAN-DI-KI, LLC v EDGEWATER HEALTH CARE, INC. Motion for Protective Order/Sanctions Motion to Seal Documents This case arises from the Plaintiff’s claim that the Defendant has breached an agreement to pay amounts due and owing in invoices for diagnostic services provided by the Plaintiff to the Defendant. Trial is set for July 31, 2017. This hearing concerns the motion of a third party, Robert Suer, for a protective order that would bar the Plaintiff,

  • Hearing

    Mar 17, 2017

  • Type

    Othr Breach Contr/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction)

UMB BANK, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE FOR THE CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FINANCE AUTHORITY EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES REVENUE BONDS (TRI-VALLEY LEARNING CORPORATION PROJECT), SERIES 2012A VS. ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

Plaintiff's Motion for Change of Venue No opposition Tentative: Deny without prejudice The motion, although unopposed, does not satisfy the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 397. If statutory grounds for the transfer exist, moving party must so state. An agreement between plaintiff and a defendant that has not yet appeared in the action is insufficient. In any event, Plaintiff would not be entitled to a refund of fees paid in this court and would be responsible for the transfer fee

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2017

LIFESOURCE WATER SYSTEMS VS JAMES MCMAHON

TENTATIVE RULING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (CCP §§471.5, 473, CRC 3.1324(a)) Calendar: 4 Date: 9/30/16 Case No: EC 062170 Trial Date: December 12, 2016 Case Name: Lifesource Water Systems, Inc. v. McMahon Moving Party: Plaintiff LifeSource Water Systems, Inc. Responding Party: Defendant James McMahon RULING: Motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. The motion fails to comply with the procedural requirements of CRC 3

  • Hearing

    Sep 30, 2016

  • Type

    Other Commercial/Business Tort (General Jurisdiction)

JAIME V. CALIFORNIA CARS AND TIRES EXPRESS

Defendants California Cars and Tires Express, Lili Lopez, and Felix Romero’s unopposed motion to deem matters admitted is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (b).) The request for monetary sanctions against plaintiff Samuel Jaime is GRANTED, in the amount of $1,260.00. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (c).) If no hearing is requested, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1312, or further notice is required.

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2014

TWIN RIVERS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT VS. C FINANCIAL INVESTMENT INC

All dismissals on this matter have been filed. The Court dropped this matter from calendar.

  • Hearing

    Jun 23, 2014

  • Type

    Breach of Contract/Warranty

ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISC0 ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Temporary Stay; Set for hearing on Monday, November 5, 2012, Line 13, PLAINTIFF ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP Notice Of Motion And Motion For Temporary Stay; Off calendar per Order Granting Stay entered on October 15. =302/EG

  • Hearing

    Nov 5, 2012

JOSEPH ORRICK VS MARY GELBER. ET AL

EVENT DATE: 4/2/2009 Mandatory appearance of Joseph Orrick - Plaintiff Pro Per is required. This case is now 729 days old; no answers/responsive pleadings or defaults have been filed. Plaintiff failed to file an Attorney Compliance Statement. See Local Rule ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 27, 2009

  • Type

    PI/PD/WD - Other

JOSEPH ORRICK VS URS CORP. BAR NONE AUCTIONS

No appearance is required subject to the following order. This case has been deemed settled. The complaint and cross-complaint have not been dismissed. counsel for defendant and cross-complainant states a request for dismissal was sent to plaintiff to dismiss the complaint, but plaintiff has failed toexecute the dismissal and by the terms of the settlement, no dismissal of the cross-complaint can be made until the complaint is dismissed.No compliance statement has been filed by plaintiff. The

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2008

  • Type

    Misc Complaints - Other

AS YOU SOW VS THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Enforce Stipulated Judgment Pursuant To Code Of Civil Proedure 664.6 SET FOR HEARING ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2007, LINE 15, PLAINTIFF AS YOU SOW Motion To Enforce Stipulated Judgment Pursuant To Code Of Civil Proedure 664.6 IS OFF CALENDAR PER MOVING PARTY. =(302/PJM)

  • Hearing

    Oct 11, 2007

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,N.A. VS. FRANCIS A. MARTIN,III

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order To Charge Interest And Appoint Receiver OFF CALENDAR PER MOVING PARTY. (302/REQ/ju)

  • Hearing

    Dec 19, 2005

GIBSON GUITAR CORPORATION , A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS. GMS INSTITUTION SALES ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Preliminary Injunction Pursuant To Order To Show Cause GRANT-NO OPPOSITION FILED. (302/REQ)

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2004

MALCOLM VS ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE

Motion For Order Sealing Documents GRANT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CRC 243; NO OPPOSITION FILED. (302/REQ/ju)

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2003

1 2     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.