Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

1-25 of 476,030 results

ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT VS. SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS US, LLC

Defendant C&D Technologies, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment against SOCO West, Inc., Brenntag Pacific, Inc., Martin Commercial Group, Inc. and Industrial Plaza, L.P. Cross-defendant C&D Technologies, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment of the contribution, indemnity and declaratory relief claims brought against it by Cross-Complainants Martin Commercial Group, Industrial Plaza, L.P., Soco West, Inc. and Brenntag Pacific, Inc. is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2020

ESMAELIAN VS. FREMONT PROPERTY, LLC

1.MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR ADJUDICATION Defendants Fremont Property, LLC, and 1st Commercial Realty Group, Inc.’s (“MP”), Motion for Summary Judgment is Denied. Plaintiff has set forth a question of material fact regarding MP’s knowledge of issues related to the prior “Zaman Café” sign based upon the City Inspector’s “Correct & Recall” Notice that was sent to 1st Commercial Realty Group, Inc., following installation and inspection of the “Zaman Café” sign.

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2018

OVERRATED PRODUCTIONS INC VS UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP ET AL

Hearing Date: March 21, 2019 Case Name: Overrated Productions, Inc. v. Universal Music Group, et al. Case No.: BC682325 Motion: (1) Motion for Summary Judgment (2) Motions to Compel Moving Party: (1) Defendants Universal International Music, B.V., Universal Music Group, Inc., UMG Recordings, Inc., UMG Recordings Services, Inc., UMG Commercial Services, Inc., and Universal Music Group Holdings, Inc. (2) Plaintiff Overrated Productions, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

WENDY W. CHO VS 936 GREEN STREET, LLC

MOTION FOR OSC RE CONTEMPT Moving Party: Defendants 936 Green Street, LLC, Turtle Capital Group, Inc. and Eho Lin Responding Party: Plaintiff Wendy W.

  • Hearing

    Dec 21, 2018

L.A. COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. VS. RIVER X TRANSPORT, INC.

Commercial Group, Inc. under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 for entry of judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement is GRANTED. The declaration of attorney Jessica L. Lemoine provides sufficient evidence to establish that defendant has breached the terms of the written settlement agreement entitling plaintiff to entry of judgment in the agreed amount of $22,727.12 plus costs of $90.00 and attorney’s fees of $400.00 associated with making this motion.

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2019

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

  • County

    Merced County, CA

WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY VS CRIVELLO BROS CONSTRUCTION INC

Commercial Group, Inc. dba Continental Commercial Group is ordered to appear at the hearing. All other interested parties and claimants may also appear.

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Wendy Chang

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY VS CRIVELLO BROS CONSTRUCTION INC

The court also stated that if any party intends to make a claim on the deposited funds, a written declaration must be filed in the clerk’s office. On January 29, 2019, third-party L.A. Commercial Group, Inc. dba Continental Commercial Group (“LACG”) file a claim based on an assignment by Claimant Hirsch Pipe & Supply, Inc. (“Hirsch”). At the hearing on March 12, 2019, the court continued the matter to allow supplemental briefing by LACG regarding its claim.

  • Hearing

    Apr 22, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Wendy Chang

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

LOCAL INITIATIVE HEALTH AUTHORITY FOR L A CO VS PAUL M COOK

Case Number: BC601669 LOCAL INITIATIVE HEALTH AUTHORITY FOR L A CO VS PAUL M COOK Filing Date: 11/19/2015 Case Type: Other Commercial/Business Tort 02/28/2018 Motion to be Relieved as Counsel NOTICE OF TENTATIVE RULING AND PROCEDURE FOR SUBMISSION WITHOUT HEARING The parties may submit to the tentative ruling without appearing for the hearing if you follow these instructions: (1) If ALL PARTIES (except if no other parties have appeared, only Plaintiff) have read the tentative ruling and ALL PARTIES agree

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2018

BRIAN P BURNS VS. THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC., A DELAWARE

Defendant The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.'S Demurrer To First Amended Complaint SET FOR HEARING ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 23, 2007, LINE 23. DEFENDANT THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.'S DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND TO CLARIFY THE ALLEGATIONS OF PARAGRAPHS 14 AND 15 SO AS TO DETERMINE WHETHER PLAINTIFF HAS A CLAIM UNDER COMMERCIAL CODE SECTION 3405.

  • Hearing

    May 23, 2007

WATER COURT VS. ADAMS WINE GROUP

The Court awards Principe & Westoaks Commercial Group, Inc. $360,520.50 ($357,040.50 plus fees for motion and prior hearing of $3,480.

  • Hearing

    Aug 31, 2018

CHERYL MCCREADY VS. BEAULIEU GROUP, LLC, A GEORGIA CORPORATION ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ; Defendants Beaulieu Group, Llc, Beaulieu Commercial, Beaulieu Of America, Bolyu, Inc., And Jo Ann Dunhams Notice Of Motion And Motion For Summary Judgment, Or, In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication Of Issues Set for hearing on Wednesday, November 18, 2015, line 8. DEFENDANTS BEAULIEU GROUP, LLC, BEAULIEU COMMERCIAL, BEAULIEU OF AMERICA, BOLYU, INC., JO DUNHAM'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Or, In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication Of Issues.

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2015

MUSIC GROUP COMMERCIAL BM LTD VS. TONY KARAVIDAS ET AL

That exemption, which is narrowly construed, requires that defendant speaker himself engage in the business of selling products and does not apply to a speaker acting on behalf of or as an agent of a person that is in the business of selling products. (Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc. v. Gore (2010) 49 Cal.4th 12, 22; All One God Faith, Inc. v. Organic and Sustainable Industry Standards, Inc. (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1186, 1213). Music Group has not shown that Mr.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2017

FUNDATION GROUP LLC VS. AYVA GROUP INC., ET AL

Responding Party: Defendant Mike Ayva (No Opposition) Causes of Action from Complaint 1) Breach of Contract 2) Breach of Personal Guaranty 3) Unjust Enrichment 4) Money Had and Received 5) Account Stated SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT: Plaintiff Fundation Group, LLC alleges that in January of 2018, a written agreement was made between plaintiff and defendant Ayva Group Ink aka Ayva Group, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Nov 08, 2019

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

OASIS MANAGEMENT GROUP VS. SOUTH COUNTY AQUATIC AND PHYSICAL THERAPY CENTER INC

Hopkins Real Estate Group (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 849, 856. Under California law, an attachment may issue only if the claim sued upon is (1) a claim “for money ... based upon a contract, express or implied;” (2) of a “fixed or readily ascertainable amount not less than $500;” (3) that is either unsecured or secured by personal property; and (4) that is acommercial claim.” Code Civ. Proc. § 483.010.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2017

OASIS MANAGEMENT GROUP VS. SOUTH COUNTY AQUATIC AND PHYSICAL THERAPY CENTER INC

Hopkins Real Estate Group (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 849, 856. Under California law, an attachment may issue only if the claim sued upon is (1) a claim “for money ... based upon a contract, express or implied;” (2) of a “fixed or readily ascertainable amount not less than $500;” (3) that is either unsecured or secured by personal property; and (4) that is acommercial claim.” Code Civ. Proc. § 483.010.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2017

FILIBERTO LOPEZ RUIZ VS BP OVERTURE INC ET AL

Titan Group, Inc. and Eva Liang as Doe Defendants. On November 9, 2018, the clerk entered BP Overture and Zhang’s defaults. The complaint alleges BP Overture owned and operated a food processing and commercial packing company at 10838 Weaver Avenue, Suite B, South El Monte, California 91733 and is the alter ego of the Doe Defendants, including U.S. Titan Group, Inc. and Eva Liang. Plaintiff Ruiz alleges he worked six days a week as a packer for Defendants from March 22, 2015 through November 24, 2017.

  • Hearing

    Sep 26, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

CATALINA RESTAURANT GROUP INC VS RON HARPER

Sterne Tentative Ruling November 14, 2011 Case: Catalina Restaurant Group, Inc. v. Ron L. Harper, et al., Case No. 1372650 Motion: Motion to Consolidate Actions Tentative Ruling: Plaintiff’s motion to consolidate the present case with Santa Barbara Superior Court Case No. 1379845 is granted. DISCUSSION: This is an action for damages and declaratory relief by a sublessor of commercial property against a sublessee.

  • Hearing

    Nov 14, 2011

STRATEGIC FUNDING SOURCE VS. BETTER AT HOME CARE-SR. LV. AST.

An attachment may be issued if the claim sued upon is based upon a contract, for a fixed or readily ascertainable amount not less than $500, that is unsecured or secured by personal property, and that is a commercial claim. Code Civ. Proc. § 483.010. Damages must be measurable by reference to the contract itself, and the basis for computing damages must be reasonable and certain. CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. v. Super DVD, Inc. (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 537, 541.

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2018

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

  • Judge

    MICHAEL A. JACQUES

  • County

    Placer County, CA

WATER COURT VS. ADAMS WINE GROUP

TENTATIVE RULING FOR JULY 25, 2018 ON MOTION BY CROSS-DEFENDANTS PRINCIPE & WESTOAKS COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. FOR ATTORNEY FEES The court grants moving parties' request for judicial notice The court finds that Principe & Westoaks Commercial Group, Inc are entitled to their fees as the prevailing "broker" with regard to the trial of the first amended cross-complaint. See paragraph 31 of the retail lease agreement.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2018

WATER COURT VS. ADAMS WINE GROUP

TENTATIVE RULING FOR JULY 25, 2018 ON MOTION BY CROSS-DEFENDANTS PRINCIPE & WESTOAKS COMMERCIAL GROUP, INC. FOR ATTORNEY FEES The court grants moving parties' request for judicial notice The court finds that Principe & Westoaks Commercial Group, Inc are entitled to their fees as the prevailing "broker" with regard to the trial of the first amended cross-complaint. See paragraph 31 of the retail lease agreement.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2018

L.A. COMMERCIAL GR OUP, INC., A CORPORATION VS EMPIRE CONTAINER FREIGHT STATION, INC., A CORPORATION

Commercial Group, Inc. v. Empire Container Freight Station, Inc. Case No.: 19CMCV00059 Matter on calendar for: Motion to Strike Answer Tentative ruling: Background This is a collection case. Defendant Empire Container Freight Station, Inc., entered into an agreement with the Allen Lund Company, LLC, but failed to make the requisite payments. Allen Lund assigned its rights to Plaintiff L.A. Commercial Group, Inc. Plaintiff now moves to strike Defendant’s answer. The motion is unopposed.

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2020

  • Judge

    Salvatore Sirna or Gary Y. Tanaka

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CATALINA RESTAURANT GROUP INC VS RON HARPER

Sterne Tentative Ruling September 26, 2011 Case: Catalina Restaurant Group, Inc., v. Ron L. Harper, et al., Case No. 1372650 Motion: (1) Motion of Plaintiff for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint (2) Motion of Plaintiff to Consolidate Actions Tentative Ruling: (1) The motion of plaintiff Catalina Restaurant Group for leave to file a first amended complaint is granted.

  • Hearing

    Sep 26, 2011

MUSIC GROUP COMMERCIAL BM LTD VS. TONY KARAVIDAS ET AL

That exemption, which is narrowly construed, requires that defendant speaker himself engage in the business of selling products and does not apply to a speaker acting on behalf of or as an agent of a person that is in the business of selling products. (Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc. v. Gore (2010) 49 Cal.4th 12, 22; All One God Faith, Inc. v. Organic and Sustainable Industry Standards, Inc. (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1186, 1213). Music Group has not shown that Mr.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2017

CHERYL MCCREADY VS. BEAULIEU GROUP, LLC, A GEORGIA CORPORATION ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ; Defendants Beaulieu Group, Llc, Beaulieu Commercial, Beaulieu Of America, Bolyu, Inc., And Jo Ann Dunhams Notice Of Motion And Motion For Summary Judgment, Or, In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication Of Issues Set for hearing on Tuesday, December 1, 2015, Line 13, PART 1 OF 2 DEFENDANTS BEAULIEU GROUP, LLC, BEAULIEU COMMERCIAL, BEAULIEU OF AMERICA, BOLYU, INC.

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2015

RICHARD HERNANDEZ VS CITY OF COMMERCE, ET AL.

City of Commerce; Lena Shumway Golden Perspective, LLC; J &L Property Holdings, LLC; High Note, LLC; LA Green Rush, LLC; Commerce Cannabis Company; 2SBK, Inc.; New Earth Products, LLC; New Era Healing, LLC; VK Labs, LLC; ABC Commerce, LLC; Synergy Business Management, Inc.; Asceend Group, LLC; Claremont Capital Partners, LLC; Summit Manufacturing, LLC; DJCC Corporation; Commerce Concentrates, LLC; NotStanLa, Inc.; GE United Technologies, LLC; Cannex Holdings (California) Inc.; The Cure Company; The MCR Group

  • Hearing

    Mar 17, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • Judge

    Richard E. Rico or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.