Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

STRICKER V. GMAC ET AL.,

.]; Beck v. Reinholt (1956) 138 Cal.App.2d 719, 722.) Defendants show that the property was sold in accordance with Civil Code section 2924's foreclosure procedures and the power of sale provisions contained in the Deed of Trust. (Civ. Code, §§ 2924-2924k; Royal Thrift v. County Escrow, Inc. (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th 24.) The Deed of Trust (Request for Judicial Notice, Exh.

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2011

ANTRANIK KEVORKIAN VS LISA ANN HASTINGS

North Central District Department B ANTRANIK kevorkian, Plaintiff, vs. lisa hastings, Defendant. Case No.: BC626405 Hearing Date: March 22, 2019 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion for reconsideration Background Allegations of the Operative Complaint Plaintiff Antarnik Kevorkian (“Plaintiffs”) alleges that while he was trying to serve Defendant Lisa Hastings (“Defendant”) with court papers, she ran from her driveway and charged in Plaintiff’s direction angrily, yelling and with pepper spray in hand.

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2019

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE

DOUGLAS GUSIMAT LISA N CAMARILLO-GUSIMAT JACKSON GLICK REYNA G CAMARILLO-GUSIMAT JOSCELYN JONES Need: 1. Determination of Conservatee’s Appropriate Level of Care filed on mandatory Judicial Council Form GC-355. PrC § 2352.5 2. Bond presented for filing before Order will be signed. The Court is waiting for these items: 1. Court Investigator’s Report 2. Report of Attorney Scott Poling Notes: A. Court will dispense with formal service on conservatee. B.

  • Hearing

    Dec 12, 2016

STEPHEN BECK VS 1260 BB PROPERTY LLC ET AL

Discussion: Plaintiff Stephen Forrest Beck (sometimes referred to herein as plaintiff or Beck) is the son of Col. John Nelson Beck and Katherine Beck (Col. and Mrs. Beck). (Beck decl., ¶ 2.) Col. and Mrs. Beck were members of the Coral Casino Beach and Cabana Club (Coral Casino), a non-equity private club, since prior to 1980. (Beck decl., ¶ 2; Speer decl., ¶ 4 & exhibit B, § 1.2.) Among the amenities of the Coral Casino are a number of poolside cabanas. (Beck decl., ¶ 3.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2014

EARL BECK ET AL VS. AMERICA ASBESTOS CO.

PLAINTIFFS EARL BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, GREGORY BECK, JOSEPH BECK, CINDY LIND AND DEBBIE SMITH'S MOTION For A New Trial On DEFENDANT Huber, Hunt Nichols' MOTION For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative, For Reconsideration Of This Courts Order Granting Summary Judgment IS CONTINUED TO MAY 17, 2007. MATTER TO BE HEARD BY JUDGE PATRICK J. MAHONEY. =(302/PJB/KD)

  • Hearing

    May 10, 2007

EARL BECK ET AL VS. AMERICA ASBESTOS CO.

PLAINTIFFS EARL BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, GREGORY BECK, JOSEPH BECK, CINDY LIND AND DEBBIE SMITH'S MOTION For A New Trial On DEFENDANT Huber, Hunt Nichols MOTION For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative, For Reconsideration Of This Courts Order Granting Summary Judgment IS OFF CALENDAR PER MOVING PARTY. =(302/PJM/PB)

  • Hearing

    May 23, 2007

EARL BECK ET AL VS. AMERICA ASBESTOS CO.

PLAINTIFFS EARL BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, GREGORY BECK, JOSEPH BECK, CINDY LIND AND DEBBIE SMITH'S MOTION For A New Trial On DEFENDANT Huber, Hunt Nichols MOTION For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative, For Reconsideration Of This Courts Order Granting Summary Judgment. A HEARING IS REQUIRED. =(302/PJM/PB)

  • Hearing

    May 17, 2007

EARL BECK ET AL VS. AMERICA ASBESTOS CO.

PLAINTIFFS EARL BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, CHRISTINE BECK, GREGORY BECK, JOSEPH BECK, CINDY LIND AND DEBBIE SMITH'S MOTION For A New Trial On DEFENDANT Huber, Hunt & Nichols' MOTION For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative, For Reconsideration Of This Courts Order Granting Summary Judgment IS CONTINUED TO MAY 10, 2007. MATTER TO BE HEARD BY JUDGE MAHONEY. =(302/PJB)

  • Hearing

    Apr 20, 2007

CYNTHIA BECK VS CYRUS NAMINI, ET AL.

Cynthia Beck v. Cyrus Namini et al; 18STCV02713 Tentative decision on application for preliminary injunction: granted Plaintiff Cynthia Beck (“Beck”) seeks a preliminary injunction to enjoin Defendants Cyrus Namini and Franklin & Sons, Inc. (collectively “Namini”) from selling or harming her 1972 Porsche 911S during the pendency of the litigation.

  • Hearing

    Nov 27, 2018

OTAY LAND COMPANY VS U E LIMITED L P

Beck Development Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 1160, 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 518 (Beck) did extend Mangini to shield a former owner based on its own consent, but noted the owner conducted its activities lawfully and an intermediate purchaser had "full knowledge of the past usage of the property." (Beck, at p. 1216, 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 518.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 12, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

CYNTHIA BECK VS DANIEL LEIGHTON, ET AL.

Beck now requests entry of default judgment against Tannet and One Matrix Models. Beck also moves to compel Leighton to respond to the written discovery and for an order deeming the matters in the Requests for Admission admitted. Beck also seeks monetary sanctions. The motion is unopposed.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JESSICA SUYAMA VS BRIAN ALAN BECK

Jessica suyama , Plaintiff, vs. brian allan beck , Defendant. Case No.: BC604456 Hearing Date: June 21, 2017 Time: 1:30 p.m. [Tentative] Order RE: MOTION TO relate and CONSOLIDATE two matters MOVING PARTY: Defendant Brian Allan Beck RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Jessica Suyama Motion to Relate and Consolidate Two Matters The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.

  • Hearing

    Jun 21, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

STEPHEN FORREST BECK V. 1260BB PROPERTY, LLC, ET AL.,

In August 2008, construction was complete and Beck resumed his exclusive use of cabana number 16. (Complaint, ¶ 9.) On or about August 2008, Rice and Earp instructed Speer to have the Coral Casino breach its membership agreement with Beck and refuse Beck continued exclusive use of cabana number 16. (Complaint, ¶ 18.) On or about September 5, 2008, when Beck visited the Coral Casino, the front desk staff informed him that they had been instructed not to give him the key to cabana number 16. (Ibid.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 08, 2010

STEPHEN BECK VS 1260 BB PROPERTY LLC ET AL

In August 2008, construction was complete and Beck resumed his exclusive use of cabana number 16. (Complaint, ¶ 9.) On or about August 2008, Rice and Earp instructed Speer to have the Coral Casino breach its membership agreement with Beck and refuse Beck continued exclusive use of cabana number 16. (Complaint, ¶ 18.) On or about September 5, 2008, when Beck visited the Coral Casino, the front desk staff informed him that they had been instructed not to give him the key to cabana number 16. (Ibid.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2010

IVAN MORAN VS. CITY OF PASADENA, ET AL

The Plaintiff’s request is to augment the record by designating portions of the transcript of the deposition of Michael Beck. The Court granted leave on January 5, 2017 for the Plaintiff to conduct a deposition of Michael Beck that was limited to obtain information about his conduct after the hearing before the arbitrator.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2017

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

GLENN LASSITER VS CITY OF LONG BEACH ET AL

Beck has the required “direct personal factual information” necessary to defeat the apex doctrine. (See Nagle, supra, at p. 1468.) Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion to depose Mr. Beck. Should further discovery show that Mr. Beck has “direct personal factual knowledge,” plaintiff may re-file his motion. PMK depositions Finally, plaintiff moves to compel the deposition of the “PMK of discipline at Public Works and Environmental Services Bureau.” (See Notice of Motion, p. 2: 7-8.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 30, 2018

KENNETH VESSELL VS THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL

Defendants City of Los Angeles, Charles Beck, Steve Tallakson, and Irmina Dumaplin’s Motion to Quash the Deposition Notice of Charles Beck; or in the Alternative Motion for a Protective Order is GRANTED pursuant to the Court’s authority under Code of Civil Procedure §2025.410(c).) The motion was timely filed and served and accompanied by a declaration setting forth counsel’s meet and confer efforts.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2016

RE: FIRST & FINAL RPT & PET’N FOR ALLOWANCE OF FEES & REIM OF COSTS

ABRAHAM MAURICE POWELL ABRAHAM FILED ON 11/30/20 BY KATHRYN ROSE BECK CANTU Need: 1. Petition for Probate (as supplement to petition filed 11-30-20) 2. Proposed Order DE-140 KATHRYN LOUISE BECK KATHRYN ROSE BECK CANTU MARK F. ORNELLAS TERESA MARRELLO JENNIFER L. WALLIS

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

KARI DAVISON VS ARVIS DAVARPANAH

(Beck Decl., ¶ 3, Exh. A.) The deposition was cancelled so Defendant could obtain Plaintiff’s written discovery responses. (Beck Decl., ¶ 4.) On August 15, 2019, Defendant served a first amended notice of taking Plaintiff’s deposition. (Beck Decl., ¶ 4, Exh. B.) The deposition was cancelled so Defendant could participate in mediation in another case. (Beck Decl., ¶ 5.) On August 23, 2019, Defendant served a second amended notice of taking Plaintiff’s deposition. (Beck Decl., ¶ 5, Exh. C.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 09, 2020

LAW OFFICES OF MARVIN L MATHIS VS LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A L

Mathis Law, Mathis and Beck are ordered to provide notice of this Order.

  • Hearing

    May 24, 2017

LAW OFFICES OF MARVIN L MATHIS VS LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A L

Plaintiff prepared a written agreement entitled “Retainer for Legal Services” (the “Retainer”) when Cross-Defendant Theresa Beck (“Beck”) and Mr. Diedrich Ellis met with him in his office on May 18, 2012. The Carters were not present. Beck was not authorized by the Carters to act on their behalf when she met with Plaintiff. 3.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2016

ARTURO MENDES GONZALEZ VS. DANIEL CUEVAS ELIZONDO

(Beck Decl., ¶ 9.) On July 18, 2019, Dr. Rappard did not appear for his deposition because he was with a patient who was not regaining consciousness from anesthesia. (Beck Decl., ¶ 10; Szabo Decl., ¶ 4.) The same day, Moving Party learned that Dr. Rappard had referred Plaintiff to receive another set of MRI scans and would be further examining Plaintiff after these scans’ results were received. (Beck Dec., ¶ 11.) Dr. Rappard’s deposition was continued. (Beck Decl., ¶¶ 13, 17, Exh. F.) Dr.

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2019

BENJAMIN CANNON VS. RITZ FIELDS A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

Beck and Beck Law, P.C. (collectively "Beck") to compel and for sanctions is unopposed and granted. Plaintiff Benjamin Cannon must produce Code-compliant verified responses to the interrogatories and requests for production no later than July 16, 2018. The genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in Beck's requests for admission are deemed admitted.

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2018

  • Judge

    Melinda Derish

  • County

    San Francisco County, CA

SCOTT LAMBERT VS PATRICK GOLDBERG MCMAHON, ET AL.

Beck’s Opposition Beck is a part owner of P&S and he opposes termination of the receivership. Beck has not submitted a declaration of his own. In his opposition brief, Beck states the “Beck will agree to the removal of the receiver if Lambert agrees that Beck shall be appointed Manager of P&S, with all powers granted to the Manager by the effective Operating Agreement, pending the outcome of this case.” (Oppo. 5.) Lambert apparently has not agreed to such terms.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

IN RE THE FRED C. SELZER, JR. FAMILY TRUST-RESIDUAL TRUST

At the same time, Katrina petitioned to remove Beck as trustee of the Selzer Family Survivor's Trust, and for an accounting. On January 23, 2015, Beck submitted a joint accounting for both trusts, acting in "de facto" fiduciary capacity for the residual trust.

  • Hearing

    Aug 05, 2015

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.