Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

1-25 of 586 results

TATYANA CHERVINSKIY VS. BEAZER HOMES HOLDINGS CORP

., Stucco Works and Yard Furnishers, Inc. If you think you have paid these fees, please file a Notice of Compliance and attach a receipt and it will be considered. Plaintiff is ordered to notify all counsel/parties of this minute order. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Management Calendar, all tentative rulings shall become the final ruling of the court.

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2013

DENNIS KWONG VS. CENTEX HOMES

Paul Mercury Insurance, Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America and Yard Furnishers, Inc. these fees need to be paid within 30 days of this order. If you think you have paid these fees, please file a Notice of Compliance and attach a receipt and it will be considered. NOTICE: To request oral argument on this matter, you must call the Court at (916) 874-7885 (Department 35) by 4:00 p.m., the court day before this hearing and notification of oral argument must be made to the opposing party/counsel.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2014

RAY V. WESTWOOD HOMES, INC.

(1) Defendant Westwood Promontory, Ltd’s Motion for Reconsideration of Ex Parte Order. (2) Defendant Westwood Promontory, Ltd’s Motion to Dismiss Action for Delay in Prosecution. Defendant Westwood Promontory, Ltd’s Motion for Reconsideration of Ex Parte Order. On January 23, 2017 the court set trial to commence on October 23, 2017. The January...

  • Hearing

    Aug 24, 2017

RAY V. WESTWOOD HOMES, INC.

Defendant Westwood Promontory, LTD’s Motion to Dismiss Action for Delay in Prosecution. TENTATIVE RULING # 3: UPON STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, THIS MATTER IS CONTINUED TO 8:30 A.M. ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 24, 2017 IN DEPARTMENT NINE TO BE HEARD CONCURRENTLY WITH DEFENDANT WESTWOOD PROMONTORY, LTD’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF EX PARTE ORDER. ...

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2017

SEAN LUDDY. ET AL. VS. THE FORCAST GROUP. LP. ET AL.

Mandatory appearance of Luke Ryan, Attorney for Plaintiff is required. Mandatory appearance of Edward Hugenin, Attorney for Defendant is required. Counsel to be prepared to explain why the Court has not received a proposed Case Management Order....

  • Hearing

    Feb 05, 2008

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

SEAN LUDDY. ET AL. VS. THE FORCAST GROUP. LP. ET AL.

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal - Case Management Program continued to 11/18/2010 at 08:30 in this department. This hearing is continued in order to allow the Cross Complainants time to conclude the settlement agreement and have dismissals filed. Cross Complainants are ordered to p...

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2010

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

SEAN LUDDY. ET AL. VS. THE FORCAST GROUP. LP. ET AL.

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal - Case Management Program continued to 08/19/2010 at 08:30 in this department. An Attorney Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to hearing. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Ma...

  • Hearing

    May 13, 2010

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

SEAN LUDDY. ET AL. VS. THE FORCAST GROUP. LP. ET AL.

Mandatory appearance of Luke Ryan, Attorney for the Plaintiff is required. Mandatory appearance of Edward Hugenin, Attorney for the Defendant is required. Mandatory appearance of all counsel. is required....

  • Hearing

    May 06, 2008

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

SEAN LUDDY. ET AL. VS. THE FORCAST GROUP. LP. ET AL.

...

  • Hearing

    Nov 28, 2007

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

SEAN LUDDY. ET AL. VS. THE FORCAST GROUP. LP. ET AL.

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 02/07/2008 at 08:30 AM in this department. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing....

  • Hearing

    Nov 27, 2007

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

SEAN LUDDY. ET AL. VS. THE FORCAST GROUP. LP. ET AL.

No appearance is required under the following conditions: The Court orders the entire action dismissed without prejudice. All remaining Cross-Complaint(s) are dismissed. This dismissal is ordered pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1385. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Management Calendar, all tentative...

  • Hearing

    Nov 08, 2010

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

EPICK HOMES #2 LP VS. PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS INC

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been filed, proposed intervener Financial Pacific Insurance Company's motion to intervene is GRANTED. Intervener's pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The court finds good cause for intervention as proposed intervener is def...

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2009

VASANT KAMAL VS. KIMBALL HILL NATOMAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 10/02/2008 at 08:30 AM in this department....

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2008

VASANT KAMAL VS. KIMBALL HILL NATOMAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 01/15/2009 at 08:30 AM in this department.New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 Counsel has advised the court that the parties are close to a stipulation to modify the stay order to pe...

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2008

MICHAEL ETTNER VS. LENNAR RENAISSANCE INC

No appearance is required under the following conditions: The above-entitled action is transferred to department 13 for consideration of complex designation. The plaintiff is ordered to contact the clerk in department 13 at (916) 874-7786 to select a date for hearing. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Manage...

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2011

VASANT KAMAL VS. KIMBALL HILL NATOMAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 07/31/2008 at 08:30 AM in this department. The Court orders the Special Master to submit a Case Management Order....

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2008

VASANT KAMAL VS. KIMBALL HILL NATOMAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Event Date: 02/26/2009 No appearance is required under the following conditions: Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 08/27/2009 at 08:30 AM in this department. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 Absent a r...

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2009

VASANT KAMAL VS. KIMBALL HILL NATOMAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Nature of Proceeding: Case Management Conference No appearance is required under the following conditions: Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 09/25/2008 at 08:30 AM in this department. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local ...

  • Hearing

    Jul 30, 2008

VASANT KAMAL VS. KIMBALL HILL NATOMAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 12/04/2008 at 08:30 AM in this department. A bankruptcy stay order is in effect arising from bankruptcy proceedings pertaining to Kimball Hill Homes California, Inc. At the case management conference, counsel and the special m...

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2008

VASANT KAMAL VS. KIMBALL HILL NATOMAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Event Date: 08/27/2009 No appearance is required under the following conditions: The matter, having been previously deemed complex by the Honorable David W. Abbott, is transferred and assigned to department 30, the Honorable David De Alba presiding as the complex case coordinator. The clerk of the court in department 30 will issue a notice ...

  • Hearing

    Aug 25, 2009

LAURIE LEWIS. JAN TRIFIRO. ET AL VS. EPICK HOMES-FERRARI.INC

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This case is referred to Judge Cadei in Department 58 for ruling on Complex Case Designation. The parties are directed to contact the clerk of Department 58 at (916) 874-7366 for a hearing date and time....

  • Hearing

    Jun 04, 2008

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

VASANT KAMAL VS. KIMBALL HILL NATOMAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 02/26/2009 at 08:30 AM in this department. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055...

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2009

LAURIE LEWIS. JAN TRIFIRO. ET AL VS. EPICK HOMES-FERRARI.INC

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been filed, proposed intervener Ranger Insurance's motion to intervene is GRANTED. Intervener's pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the filing fee. The court finds good cause for intervention given the absence of opposition and the fact that interven...

  • Hearing

    Oct 05, 2009

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MARK K PASSEY VS. CARSON HOMES

No appearance is required under the following conditions: The Court has received the Notice of Settlement of Entire Case and orders the following: The Status Conference - Complex set for 01/15/2016 at 11:30 AM in Department 35 is vacated. The Pre-Trial Conference - Complex set for 04/01/2016 at 1:30 PM in Department 35 is vacated. T...

  • Hearing

    Apr 27, 2015

DIMITRY MISIK VS. LAKEMONT HOMES INC

Below is the tentative ruling for the hearing on July 19, 2016. On 7/15/2016 a request for dismissal of Lakemont Pearl Hight's cross-complaint was entered. The Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal -Complex set for July 19, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. is dropped. NOTICE: To request oral argument on this matter, you must call the Court at (916) 874-78...

  • Hearing

    Jul 18, 2016

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 24     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.