Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

1-25 of 5,311 results

ERNEST TENEYCK VS ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION

Finally, Defendant argues that discovery is ongoing, and there may be additional parties which may be liable for indemnity and contribution, and thus intends to include Roes 1-50 in any cross-complaint filed. In opposition, the Plaintiff argues that leave to file a cross-complaint as to Inter-Con should be denied. Plaintiff does not oppose the cross-complaint against PM Construction.

  • Hearing

    Mar 15, 2018

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JAVIER LOPEZ ET AL VS WEST COAST PUBLIC WORKS

Consistent with that statement, the caption on the proposed cross-complaint states that the proposed cross-defendant is “Damaris Abiggal (sic) Lopez and Roes 1-50.” But the first sentence of the proposed cross-complaint states that Defendants bring the cross-complaint against Javier Lopez in addition to Damaris Lopez and Roes 1-50. In opposing the motion, Plaintiffs state that Plaintiff Javier Lopez is one of the proposed cross-defendants and Defendants do not correct that statement in the reply brief.

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2020

ECHO PARK VILLAGE LLC VS ONE DOWN DOG LLC ET AL

Daneshgar, ROES 1-50, inclusive, and each them, in that Echo Park is a naked shell and framework; that the assets of Echo Park have been transferred to Mr.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2018

ENRIQUE PEDROZA ET AL VS. MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT GROUP, A BUSINESS ENTITY ET AL

Ntc And Motion To File First Amended Complaint Set for hearing on Friday, June 29, 2012, line 18, PLAINTIFFs ENRIQUE PEDROZA, LAILA PORTUGAL, ROES 1-50's Motion To File First Amended Complaint. To be heard in Department 501 on July 11, 2012 at 9:30am. =(302/HEK)

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2012

NOUGDENG SAVENGRITH ET AL VS CITY OF POMONA ET AL

Defendant/Cross-Defendant Walnut Valley Commerce Center moves the court, per CCP § 428.50(c), for an order granting it leave to file its proposed cross-complaint for Express Contractual Indemnity and Equitable Indemnity/Declaratory Relief against Wohl Property Group, RGA Architects, Thienes Engineering, Environs, Inc., Oltmans Construction Company, Norcal Engineering, Ajit Randhava & Associates, Valley Business Center and Roes 1-50.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

NOUGDENG SAVENGRITH ET AL VS CITY OF POMONA ET AL

Declaratory Relief On 6/5/18, VBC filed its cross-complaint against WVCC, Luviano, Buciososa, City, 3PX USA, Inc., Calpak and Roes 1-50 for: 1. Indemnity 2. Apportionment of Fault 3. Declaratory Relief 4. Express Indemnity A Trial Setting Conference is currently set for 6/22/18. Cross-Defendant Thienes Engineering, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

NOUGDENG SAVENGRITH ET AL VS CITY OF POMONA ET AL

On 3/2/18, the court deemed WVCC’s First Amended Cross-Complaint (“FACC”) filed that day; said FACC asserts causes of action therein against Cross-Defendants Wohl, RGA, Thienes, Environs, Oltmans, NorCal, Randhava, VBC and Roes 1-50 for: 1. Express Contractual Indemnity 2. Equitable Indemnity/Declaratory Relief On 4/4/18, WVCC dismissed its first cause of action against Wohl, without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Apr 23, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

NOUGDENG SAVENGRITH ET AL VS CITY OF POMONA ET AL

On 3/2/18, the court deemed WVCC’s First Amended Cross-Complaint (“FACC”) filed that day; said FACC asserts causes of action therein against Cross-Defendants Wohl, RGA, Thienes, Environs, Oltmans, NorCal, Randhava, VBC and Roes 1-50 for: Express Contractual Indemnity Equitable Indemnity/Declaratory Relief On 4/4/18, WVCC dismissed its first cause of action against Wohl, without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    May 02, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

ARNOLD HOLLAND VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES

[Tentative] Order RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-COMPLAINT MOVING PARTY: Defendant Hughes Markets, Inc. dba Ralphs (“Ralphs”) RESPONDING PARTY: None Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint Against City of Los Angeles and Roes 1-50 The court considered the moving papers. No opposition was filed. Background On March 16, 2017, plaintiff Arnold Holland filed a complaint against defendants City of Los Angeles and Does 1-20 for general negligence and premises liability.

  • Hearing

    Sep 06, 2017

NOUGDENG SAVENGRITH ET AL VS CITY OF POMONA ET AL

(“Environs”), Oltmans Construction Company (“Oltmans”), NorCal Engineering (“NorCal”), Ajit Randhava & Associates (“Randhava”), Valley Business Center (“VBC”) and Roes 1-50 for: Express Contractual Indemnity Equitable Indemnity/Declaratory Relief On January 3, 2018, Plaintiffs filed an “Amendment to Complaint,” wherein Randhava was named in lieu of Doe 3.

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

NOUGDENG SAVENGRITH ET AL VS CITY OF POMONA ET AL

(“Environs”), Oltmans Construction Company (“Oltmans”), NorCal Engineering (“NorCal”), Ajit Randhava & Associates (“Randhava”), Valley Business Center (“VBC”) and Roes 1-50 for: Express Contractual Indemnity Equitable Indemnity/Declaratory Relief On January 3, 2018, Plaintiffs filed an “Amendment to Complaint,” wherein Randhava was named in lieu of Doe 3.

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Petitioner and FiaintifT, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE; K E E L Y BOSLER, in her official capacity as Director of the State of California Department of Finance; DOES 1-50, inclusive, and ROES 1-50 inclusive, Respondents and Defendants. Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE The hearing on the Petition for Writ of Mandate, which was reserved by the Court clerk for November 15, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in Department 28, is dropped from the Court's calendar.

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2019

NOUGDENG SAVENGRITH ET AL VS CITY OF POMONA ET AL

(“Environs”), Oltmans Construction Company (“Oltmans”), NorCal Engineering (“NorCal”), Ajit Randhava & Associates (“Randhava”), Valley Business Center (“VBC”) and Roes 1-50 for: Express Contractual Indemnity Equitable Indemnity/Declaratory Relief On January 3, 2018, Plaintiffs filed an “Amendment to Complaint,” wherein Randhava was named in lieu of Doe 3.

  • Hearing

    Feb 13, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE; KEELY BOSLER, in her official capacity as Director of the State of California Department of Finance; DOES 1-50, inclusive, and ROES 1-50 inclusive, Respondents and Defendants. Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE The hearing on the Petition for Writ of Mandate, which was reserved by the Court clerk for November 15, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in Department 28, is dropped from the Court’s calendar.

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2019

SILVIA WOODS VS POPEYES LOUISIANA KITCHEN INC

On 11/16/17, Popeyes and Mangen filed a cross-complaint against Roes 1-50. On 2/16/18, Defendants and Cross-Complainants named These Pretzels Are Making Me Thirsty, LLC as Roe 1. On 2/27/18, Plaintiff named These Pretzels Are Making Me Thirsty, LLC as Doe 2. At this time, These Pretzels Are Making Me Thirsty, LLC seeks leave to file a cross-complaint for indemnification and related claims. The motion is denied without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Dec 13, 2018

NOUGDENG SAVENGRITH ET AL VS CITY OF POMONA ET AL

On 10/16/17, the court granted WVCC’s motion for leave to file a cross-complaint against Wohl Property Group, RGA Architects, Thienes Engineering, Environs, Inc., OLtmans Construction Company, Norcal Engineering, Ajit Randhava & Associates, Valley Business Center and Roes 1-50 for: Express Contractual Indemnity Equitable Indemnity/Declaratory Relief On 1/3/18, plaintiffs filed an “Amendment to Complaint,” wherein Randhava was named in lieu of Doe 3.

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

GALVAN, LUIS GONZALEZ VS RODRIGUEZ, JORGE

On December 5, 2017, Defendant filed a Cross-Complaint against Roes 1-50. On October 25, 2018, Defendant filed an Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement with respect to a settlement reached with Plaintiffs Luis Gonzalez Galvan, Gerardo Maravilla Herrera, and Javier Margarito Matias (“Plaintiffs”). Any motion to contest the determination of good faith settlement was to be filed by November 19, 2018. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 877.6, subd, (a)(2).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 31, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

  • Judge

    Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

SILVIA WOODS VS POPEYES LOUISIANA KITCHEN INC

On 11/16/17, Popeyes and Mangen filed a cross-complaint against Roes 1-50. On 2/16/18, Defendants and Cross-Complainants named These Pretzels Are Making Me Thirsty, LLC as Roe 1. On 2/27/18, Plaintiff named These Pretzels Are Making Me Thirsty, LLC as Doe 2. At this time, These Pretzels Are Making Me Thirsty, LLC seeks leave to file a cross-complaint for indemnification and related claims.

  • Hearing

    Dec 20, 2018

DAVID LAWRENCE CHERMAK VS WILLIAM JOSEPH BAER

Violation of Business and Professions Code § 17200 and for Injunctive Relief On 9/29/16, Baer filed his cross-complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendant/Cross-Defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange and ROES 1-50 for: 1. Implied Indemnity and Total Indemnity 2.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2017

JANE B M DOE ET AL VS EL MONTE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ET

The complaint, filed 5/4/16, asserts causes of action against Defendants El Monte Union High School District (“District”), Angelita Gonzales Hernandez (“Hernandez”) and Does 1-10 for: On 7/6/16, District filed its cross-complaint, asserting causes of action therein against Daniels and Roes 1-50 for: On 6/9/17, Daniels’ default was entered on the cross-complaint. On 1/29/18, the court granted District’s motion for summary adjudication as to the second cause of action.

  • Hearing

    Jun 01, 2018

DAVID LAWRENCE CHERMAK VS WILLIAM JOSEPH BAER

Violation of Business and Professions Code § 17200 and for Injunctive Relief On 9/29/16, Baer filed his cross-complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendant/Cross-Defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange and ROES 1-50 for: 1. Implied Indemnity and Total Indemnity 2. Declaratory Relief and Apportionment of Fault On 1/31/17, the court sustained Farmers Group, Inc.’s demurrer to the second and third causes of action in plaintiff’s complaint, without leave.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2018

RODRIGO SALAS VS YEN LIN CHU ET AL

On December 4, 2017, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Yun Lin Chu filed a cross-complaint against Roes 1-50 seeking implied indemnity, equitable indemnity, total equitable indemnity, and declaratory relief. On March 21, 2018, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Lauren Fen Chiang filed a cross-complaint against Moes 1-50 seeking implied indemnity, equitable indemnity, total equitable indemnity, and declaratory relief. On October 25, 2019, Plaintiff’s counsel; Eric H.

  • Hearing

    Nov 27, 2019

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE VS WILLIAM JOSEPH BAER

The complaint, filed on 8/8/16, asserts causes of action for: Negligence—Vehicle Accident Breach of Contract Violation of Business and Professions Code § 17200 and for Injunctive Relief On 9/29/16, Baer filed his cross-complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendant/Cross-Defendant FIE and ROES 1-50 for: Implied Indemnity and Total Indemnity Declaratory Relief and Apportionment of Fault On 1/31/17, the court sustained Farmers Group, Inc.’s demurrer to the second and third causes of action in plaintiff

  • Hearing

    May 17, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

DAVID LAWRENCE CHERMAK VS WILLIAM JOSEPH BAER

Violation of Business and Professions Code § 17200 and for Injunctive Relief On 9/29/16, Baer filed his cross-complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendant/Cross-Defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange and ROES 1-50 for: 1. Implied Indemnity and Total Indemnity 2. Declaratory Relief and Apportionment of Fault On 1/31/17, the court sustained Farmers Group, Inc.’s demurrer to the second and third causes of action in plaintiff’s complaint, without leave.

  • Hearing

    May 24, 2018

RODRIGO SALAS VS YEN LIN CHU ET AL

On December 4, 2017, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Yun Lin Chu filed a cross-complaint against Roes 1-50 seeking implied indemnity, equitable indemnity, total equitable indemnity, and declaratory relief. On March 21, 2018, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Lauren Fen Chiang filed a cross-complaint against Moes 1-50 seeking implied indemnity, equitable indemnity, total equitable indemnity, and declaratory relief. On August 28, 2019, Plaintiff’s counsel; Eric H.

  • Hearing

    Sep 27, 2019

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 213     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.