Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES VS. FORREST

HEARING ON MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT / FILED BY JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Granted. No opposition.

  • Hearing

    Sep 12, 2019

  • Judge

    Steve K. Austin

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

J NEIL & ASSOC VS CRYSTAL VISI

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR AMEND JUDGMENT TO ADD DEF WHOSE BK WAS DISMISSED FILED BY JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Appear.

  • Hearing

    Mar 15, 2018

  • Judge

    Steve K. Austin

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES INC VS EUN YUN

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. EUN YUN, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO.: BC654175 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS 8:30 a.m. April 18, 2018 Dept. 56 Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. moves for terminating sanctions due to Defendant Eun Yun’s abuse of the discovery process.

  • Hearing

    Apr 18, 2018

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS GLOE BRANDS INC., A CORPORATION

REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT MP: Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. RP: None TENTATIVE RULING Plaintiff’s default judgment application is GRANTED. SUMMARY OF CASE Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. sues the beverage manufacturer Gloe Brands Inc. fka LA Aloe LLC dba Aloe Gloe aka Gloe aka Gloe Brands aka Gloe Sparkling Water aka LA Libations aka L.A. Aloe LLC aka Aloe Gloe Investment Corp (“Defendant”) to recover $137,797.66.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2019

NEIL & ASSOCIATES VS. PEREZ

HEARING ON MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION FILED BY JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Motion for entry of judgment pursuant to stipulation is granted. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the total amount of $33,687.59 ($27,834.69 principal, $4,152.90 interest, $500 costs and $1,200 attorney’s fees).

  • Hearing

    Feb 19, 2020

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC. VS YOURIK KHACHATRYAN

*COUNSEL – YOU CANNOT SUBMIT ON THE TENTATIVE PRIOR TO THE HEARING* Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 36 JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. YOURIK KHACHATRYAN and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. Case No.: 20STCV19387 Hearing Date: 1/8/2021 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Default Application Plaintiff’s application for default judgment is granted. Dated: ____________________________ Gregory Alarcon Superior Court Judge

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES INC VS DANIEL AGUILAR PEREZ

Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc.’s Request for Entry of Default Judgment and CMC are CONTINUED to February 1, 2019. Plaintiff is not entitled to immediate possession of the collateral as described in its proposed judgment; it is only entitled to immediate possession of the collateral provided in its Commercial Security Agreement. Plaintiff is to submit a revised proposed judgment with Attachment “A” describing the collateral as provided in the Commercial Security Agreement.

  • Hearing

    Jan 18, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES INC VS BINACO ASPHALT PRODUCTS IN

(BC696503) Plaintiff's request for entry of default judgment Having reviewed Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc.'s Request for Default Judgment (received 7/9/18) with a proof of service of 7/7/18), the court finds that the Proposed Judgment is supported by the evidence submitted and based thereon, approves and GRANTS the request as prayed. The court intends to sign the proposed judgment submitted. No appearance is necessary. No further dates.

  • Hearing

    Aug 07, 2018

LIGHTING AND BULBS WHOLESALE VS. RANCHO OAKS

See Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Jones (2004) 33 Cal.4th 917, 936.

  • Hearing

    Apr 19, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

LIGHTING AND BULBS WHOLESALE VS. RANCHO OAKS

See Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Jones (2004) 33 Cal.4th 917, 936.

  • Hearing

    Apr 19, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

LIGHTING AND BULBS WHOLESALE VS. RANCHO OAKS

See Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Jones (2004) 33 Cal.4th 917, 936.

  • Hearing

    Apr 19, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC. VS. SEKA, INC.

Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc.’s five motions to deem Plaintiff’s requests for admission admitted are CONTINUED to 12-14-17, at 2:00 p.m., in Department C-15 for Plaintiff to present evidence of the responses served by Defendants to Plaintiff’s requests for admission.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2017

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES INC VS TRADERS 2000 ET AL

CASE NAME: Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Traders 2000, et al. CASE NUMBER: BC712046 HEARING DATE: 1/14/19 CALENDAR NUMBER: 8 DATE FILED: 6/28/18 FSC/TRIAL DATE: None NOTICE: OK PROCEEDING: Request for Entry of Default Judgment MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS L AND M MODULAR CONTRACTOR INC., A CORPORATION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC., etc., Plaintiff, vs. L AND M MODULAR CONTRACTOR INC., etc., et al., Defendants. CASE NO.: 19STCV43096 ORDER RE: DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPLICATION Date: July 20, 2020 Time: 10:35 a.m.

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS KAREN ARAKELYAN

On April 10, 2019, Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. filed the instant action against Defendant Karen Arakelyan. The Complaint asserts causes of action for: Breach of Guaranty for Promissory Note (Agreement #1); and Breach of Guaranty for Promissory Note (Agreement #2). On July 26, 2019, default was entered as to Defendant. On August 12, 2019, Plaintiff dismissed Does 1 through 50 without prejudice. Plaintiff seeks entry of a default judgment in the amount of $46,175.68.

  • Hearing

    Sep 30, 2019

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES INC VS IBG HOLDINGS INC ET AL

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT BACKGROUND: Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. commenced this action on October 2, 2018 against Defendants IBG Holdings Inc., DBA International Beauty Group and International Beauty Group, Inc. for: (1) goods and services sold and delivered; (2) account stated; and (3) open book account.

  • Hearing

    Apr 15, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES INC VS DANIEL AGUILAR PEREZ

Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default Judgment is GRANTED Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. filed this action against Defendant Daniel Aguilar Perez aka Daniel Perez dba Perez Trucking for failure to pay pursuant to a promissory note, credit card agreement, and security agreement that were assigned to Plaintiff by Bank of the West. Plaintiff seeks an entry of default judgment in the amount of $21,995.52, plus entitlement to immediate possession of security collateral.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES INC VS IBG HOLDINGS INC ET AL

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT BACKGROUND: Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. commenced this action on October 2, 2018 against Defendants IBG Holdings Inc., DBA International Beauty Group and International Beauty Group, Inc. for: (1) goods and services sold and delivered; (2) account stated; and (3) open book account.

  • Hearing

    Apr 15, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

SOHRAB ROSHANIAN VS. CITY OF OXNARD

See Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Jones (2004) 33 Cal. 4th 917, 936; Tanner v. California Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. (2016) 248 Cal. App. 4th 743. Plantiff still has to be able to state viable causes of action, however.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2016

PROGRESSIVE TRANSPORTATION SERVICE, INC. V. BOWERMASTER AND ASSOCIATES INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.

Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Jones (2004) 33 Cal.4th 917, 935 to 936. In Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v.

  • Hearing

    Apr 11, 2019

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS TCD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

19STCV46006 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE MOTION TO DEEM RFAS ADMITTED AND FOR SANCTIONS Plaintiffs Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. filed this action against Defendant Mary Lee (“Defendant”) alleging an unpaid loan. On March 19, 2020, Plaintiff served request for admissions on Defendant. To date, no responses have been received. Plaintiff moves for an order deeming the requests for admissions admitted and monetary sanctions.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MARIMAR CORNEJO ET AL VS. KEY POINT CREDIT UNION A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL

(Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Jones (2004) 33 Cal.4th 917, 939.) As to Ms. Cornejo's seventh and eleventh causes of action 7 and 11, her remedy is to pursue her bad faith claim regarding ANPCC's claims handling practices rather than sue for negligence or negligent misrepresentation. (Sanchez v. Lindsey Morden Claims Services (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 249, 254.) The first amended complaint does not plead ultimate facts showing how ANPCC owed a tort or contractual duty to Mr. Bey.

  • Hearing

    Dec 11, 2017

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS TCD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS On March 19, 2020, Plaintiff Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. served written discovery on Defendant Mary Lee. Defendant did not serve responses. Plaintiff then filed a motion to deem the Requests for Admission admitted, which the Court granted on October 7, 2020. The Court ordered the RFAs deemed admitted and Plaintiff to pay sanctions of $1,000.00.

  • Hearing

    Mar 04, 2021

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC. VS YOURIK KHACHATRYAN

*COUNSEL – YOU CANNOT SUBMIT ON THE TENTATIVE PRIOR TO THE HEARING* Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 36 JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. YOURIK KHACHATRYAN and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. Case No.: 20STCV19387 Hearing Date: 11/12/2020 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Default Application Plaintiff’s application for default judgment is continued to 01/08/21 at 8:30 am. Plaintiff is ordered to file a supplemental declaration within 15 days.

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

RAY DAVID SHIPMAN, III VS KOI CBD, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

(Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Jones (2004) 33 Cal.4th 917, 936.) In applying the primary jurisdiction doctrine, courts consider whether unreasonable delay and expense will result in an inadequate remedy to litigants. (Cundiff v. GTE California, Inc. (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1412.) Here, Defendant concedes that “[t]he FDA has stated that its consideration is ongoing and will, at an unspecified date in the future, be resolved.” (Whyte Decl., ¶5.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  • Judge

    Lori Ann Fournier or Olivia Rosales

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1 2 3     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.