Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

GOMEZ V PLA-ART INTERNATIONAL INC

Defendants assert there is no evidence that any of the Defendants entered into a partnership with Plaintiff Gomez, and that, at best, Plaintiff intended GRI to have 50% ownership. Gomez cites to his deposition wherein he states that "[f]rom the minute [he and Ed Plant] started the conversation," Gomez told Ed Plant that he wanted a 50% ownership share in a new corporation. (Gomez's response to SSUF 22.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 22, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

GOMEZ V. GOMEZ

Gomez Trust u/d/t dated October 14, 1988; 14.283% to Joe Gil Gomez, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Enedina Gomez Avila; 2.860% to Rosemary Gomez Wagner; 2.86% to Mary Romana Gomez Bonk; 2.86% to Stephen Michael Gomez; 2.86% to Joe Louis Gomez; 1.428% to Paul Gomez; 1.428% to Valerie Gomez; 14.283% to David R. Gomez and Stella H. Gomez, Co-Trustees of the David G. Gomez and Teresa R. Gomez 2009 Family Trust; 14.283% to Mary M.

  • Hearing

    Sep 12, 2016

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

LIDIA JANTIZIS, ET AL. VS. ANA PAZ

RULING: Deny the motion to disqualify the Gomez Firm from representing Plaintiff as counsel.

  • Hearing

    Sep 14, 2018

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

CAREY BRENNER VS SARAH WILLIAMS

Defendant moves to disqualify Plaintiff’s counsel on the basis that Defendant consulted with Attorney Josue Cristobal Guerrero of the firm Gomez & Simone. Mark Gomez is a partner in Gomez & Simone, and is the son of Marcus Gomez—Plaintiff’s attorney in this action. Defendant initially decided to hire Gomez & Simone to represent her in this dispute, signed a retainer agreement with them, and paid a retainer fee of $1,500.00.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2018

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

GOMEZ V PLA-ART INTERNATIONAL INC

Defendants assert there is no evidence that any of the Defendants entered into a partnership with Plaintiff Gomez, and that, at best, Plaintiff intended GRI to have 50% ownership. Gomez cites to his deposition wherein he states that "[f]rom the minute [he and Ed Plant] started the conversation," Gomez told Ed Plant that he wanted a 50% ownership share in a new corporation. (Gomez's response to SSUF 22.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 22, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

LAND HOME VS GOLD STAR FINANCI

As to the Gomez employment contract with Land Home, Plaintiff alleges Gold Star was aware that Gomez was employed by Land Home when Gomez began funneling loans and customer information to Gold Star. (FAC, ¶ 58.) Plaintiff alleges Gold Star conspired with Gomez to have Gomez breach is duties of loyalty and branch management. (FAC, ¶60.) As to the allegation that Gold Star conspired with Gomez to breach his contract with Land Home, Gomez cannot conspire to interfere with his own employment contract.

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2018

IN THE MATTER OF XAVIER RYAN LOPEZ

On January 15, 2015, the court-appointed rose Gomez and Jessica Gomez, temporary co-conservators of Xavier Lopez. On April 19, 2016, the court-appointed Rosa Gomez and Jessica Gomez as general co-conservators of the person of Xavier Lopez. A 60-day care plan was ordered filed by June 20, 2016. The general conservatorship order was never submitted, and letters of general conservatorship were never issued.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2016

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

FREDERIC CERMENO ET AL VS ASHLEY GONZALEZ ET AL

Sanctions have been sufficiently noticed against Plaintiffs Frederic Cermeno, Ronald Gomez, and Erick Gomez and their counsel Sergei N. Gladkov.

  • Hearing

    Jun 07, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

IN THE MATTER OF XAVIER RYAN LOPEZ

On January 15, 2015, the court-appointed rose Gomez and Jessica Gomez, temporary co-conservators of Xavier Lopez. On April 19, 2016, the court-appointed Rosa Gomez and Jessica Gomez as general co-conservators of the person of Xavier Lopez. A 60-day care plan was ordered filed by June 20, 2016. The general conservatorship order was never submitted, and letters of general conservatorship were never issued.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2016

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

MAYELA CONTRERAS , ET AL. VS LAST MANAGEMENT PROPERTY

MOVING PARTY: Defendants Last Management, LLC and Last Property Mangmnt RESPONDING PARTY # 1: Plaintiff Lizbette Gomez RESPONDING PARTY # 2: Plaintiff Vanessa Gomez RESPONDING PARTY # 3: Plaintiff Emily Rodriguez RESPONDING PARTY # 4: Plaintiff Ramiro Valle Villalobos* RESPONDING PARTY # 5: Plaintiff Alexandra Villalobos Notice: ok RELIEF REQUESTED: Orders imposing terminating sanctions to dismiss Plaintiffs Lizbette Gomez, Vanessa Gomez, Emily Rodriguez, Ramiro Valle Villalobos* and Alexandra Valle’s

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

ZENITH INSURANCE CO., VALENTIN FRAGA GOMEZ,PLAINTIFF IN INTERVENTION V. ALBERTO RIVERA

Gomez suffered trauma injuries requiring that he be airlifted to Community Regional Medical Center. On August 12, 2013, Plaintiff Zenith Insurance Company, Merk’s workers’ compensation insurer filed a complaint for motor vehicle negligence seeking as damages, the amount of workers compensation benefits paid to Gomez.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JESSE GOMEZ VS. LUCKY ISABEL GOMEZ

GOMEZ v. GOMEZ CASE NO.: VC065464 HEARING: 09/15/16 #12 TENTATIVE ORDER Defendants LUCKY ISABEL GOMEZ, ALBERTO GOMEZ and JOSE FRANK GOMEZ’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs is GRANTED in the amount of $7,904.50. On July 20, 2016, defendants’ special motion to strike the complaint filed by plaintiff JESSE GOMEZ was granted. Defendants are entitled to mandatory attorney fees. C.C.P. § 425.16(c). The amount sought is reasonable. See Decl. of Jenny Duff. Plaintiff did not file opposition.

  • Hearing

    Sep 15, 2016

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

HENRY AGUILA VS. JOE GOMEZ

GOMEZ #5 TENTATIVE ORDER Defendant SHAWN BIDSAL’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. CCP §437c Moving Party to give Notice. This action for contractual fraud was filed by Plaintiff HENRY AGUILA on December 7, 2015. Plaintiff AGUILA alleges that he loaned defendant JOE GOMEZ the sum of $250,000 to be repaid by October 1, 2015.

  • Hearing

    Jan 23, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

IN THE MATTER OF XAVIER RYAN LOPEZ

On January 15, 2015, the court-appointed rose Gomez and Jessica Gomez, temporary co-conservators of Xavier Lopez. On April 19, 2016, the court-appointed Rosa Gomez and Jessica Gomez as general co-conservators of the person of Xavier Lopez. A 60-day care plan was ordered filed by June 20, 2016. The general conservatorship order was never submitted, and letters of general conservatorship were never issued.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2016

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF XAVIER RYAN LOPEZ

On January 15, 2015, the court-appointed rose Gomez and Jessica Gomez, temporary co-conservators of Xavier Lopez. On April 19, 2016, the court-appointed Rosa Gomez and Jessica Gomez as general co-conservators of the person of Xavier Lopez. A 60-day care plan was ordered filed by June 20, 2016. The general conservatorship order was never submitted, and letters of general conservatorship were never issued.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2016

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

AUSTIN KIM VS RICHARD DALE BUTTERY ET AL

November 8, 2016 On November 4, 2015, Plaintiff Austin Kim (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Richard Dale Buttery; Rosa Torres Campos (erroneously sued as Rosa Torres) (“Campos”); Jacqueline Gomez (“Gomez”); David Beard, Doe 1; Judy Beard, Doe 2; and A-1 Saw & Tool, Inc., Doe 3 for alleged damages arising out of two separate vehicle collisions. The first collision occurred on January 27, 2015 and the second on May 14, 2015. Campos and Gomez have reached a settlement with Plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Nov 08, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

JENNIFER MIEURE VS. ELWYN NC, ET AL. `

According to the proof of service of the deposition notice for Cesar Gomez, the notice was served by mail and fax transmission—not by personal service on Cesar Gomez or defense counsel (on behalf of Cesar Gomez). However, this was not a ground upon which Cesar Gomez objected to the deposition subpoena.

  • Hearing

    Apr 27, 2018

RUBEN MURCIA GOMEZ ET AL VS DIEGO EDDY ET AL

Plaintiff Ruben Marcia Gomez (“Gomez”) filed 3 motions to compel from Defendant Diego Eddy (“Eddy”): (1) Form Interrogatories (“FROG”), set one, and Special Interrogatories (“SROG”), set one; (2) Request for Production of Documents (“RPD”), set one; and (3) Requests for Admissions (“RFA”), set one. The motions are opposed. On June 19, 2017, Gomez served on Eddy the discovery requests. Gomez states he received unverified responses with objections to the discovery requests.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

PAZ STRATTON VS MARIA A GOMEZ ET AL

Here, Stratton was a creditor of Gomez beginning on April 17, 2012. The complaint alleges Gomez later transferred the property to avoid paying that judgment on September 10, 2012, after the money judgment was obtained against Gomez. It is true that Stratton did not record the lien against the property until March 25, 2016, after Gomez transferred the property to Cruz.

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2016

EDGARDO GAONA VS JOSEPH JOHN FREIBURGER ET AL

Here, the proof of service shows that Gomez and Velasquez were served by mail. Accordingly, the motions are denied. The Court notes that it would be inclined to grant the motions upon proof that the motions were personally served on Gomez and Velasquez. G.F. is ordered to give notice of this order.

  • Hearing

    Feb 08, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

IN THE MATTER OF XAVIER RYAN LOPEZ

Gomez is refusing to transfer the court-ordered assets; and that the conservatory is unable to thereby meet the temporary conservatee's needs. There is an existing order of this court which is very specific to Ms. Gomez. The remedy for failure to comply with an express order of the court is an order to show cause re contempt. Set order to show cause re contempt and order Rosa Gomez to appear. gmr

  • Hearing

    Dec 31, 2015

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

GONZALEZ VS GOMEZ

The initial litigation concerns a business dispute between Michael Gonzalez and Eduardo Gomez and Araceli Gomez over Lalo’s Auto Repair, LLC. Gomez filed a cross-action against Rodriguez in his personal capacity for fiduciary breaches and alleged that he embezzled or otherwise stole funds from Gomez while he was an employee of the LLC.

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2019

IN THE MATTER OF XAVIER RYAN LOPEZ

Gomez is refusing to transfer the court-ordered assets; and that the conservatory is unable to thereby meet the temporary conservatee's needs. There is an existing order of this court which is very specific to Ms. Gomez. The remedy for failure to comply with an express order of the court is an order to show cause re contempt. Set order to show cause re contempt and order Rosa Gomez to appear. gmr

  • Hearing

    Dec 31, 2015

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

IN THE MATTER OF XAVIER RYAN LOPEZ

Gomez is refusing to transfer the court-ordered assets; and that the conservatory is unable to thereby meet the temporary conservatee's needs. There is an existing order of this court which is very specific to Ms. Gomez. The remedy for failure to comply with an express order of the court is an order to show cause re contempt. Set order to show cause re contempt and order Rosa Gomez to appear. gmr

  • Hearing

    Dec 31, 2015

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB, AN INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE, ET AL. VS YOLANDA GOMEZ

The Court awards Plaintiff $20,879.80 against Defendant Yolanda Gomez. The Court awards Plaintiff $26,402.16 against Defendant Juan Antonio Gomez. Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 178     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.