JAMES HITES VS. K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES NORTHERN INC
Appearance is required. Notice: Given the circumstances presented by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, this hearing will be conducted remotely via Zoom [which includes telephonic and teleconferencing options]. The Department 41 Zoom link is: https://saccourt.zoom.us/my/dept41a. The Zoom ID is: 349 373 7884. The Zoom number is (888) 475-449...
-
Hearing
Sep 23, 2020
- Judge David De Alba
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
JAMES HITES VS. K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES NORTHERN INC
Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed intervenor, Financial Pacific Insurance Company's, motion to intervene is granted. Intervenor's pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The Court finds good cause for intervention as intervenor is insurer...
-
Hearing
Feb 05, 2019
- Judge David De Alba
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
JAMES HITES VS. K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES NORTHERN INC
Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed intervenor, Financial Pacific Insurance Company's, motion to intervene is granted. Intervenor's pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The Court finds good cause for intervention as intervenor is insurer...
-
Hearing
Feb 05, 2019
- Judge Russell L. Hom
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
JAMES HITES VS. K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES NORTHERN INC
Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed intervenor, Financial Pacific Insurance Company's, motion to intervene is granted. Intervenor's pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The Court finds good cause for intervention as intervenor is insurer...
-
Hearing
Feb 05, 2019
- Judge Russell L. Hom
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
JAMES HITES VS. K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES NORTHERN INC
Appearance required. The case management conference hearing on Friday, January 8, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. is confirmed. The parties are required to appear. Given the circumstances presented by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, this hearing will be conducted remotely via Zoom [which includes telephonic and teleconferencing options]. The Department 4...
-
Hearing
Jan 07, 2021
- Judge David De Alba
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
ALAMILLO RODRIGUEZ VS. GOURMET SPECIALITIES, INC., ET. AL
Plaintiff Andrew Alamillo Rodriguez moves the Court for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. He states three reasons for seeking leave: He wants to remove certain Defendants from certain Causes of Action;He wants to add certain Defendants to his Cause of Action for Failure to Provide Workers Compensation Insurance; andHe wants to “clarif...
-
Hearing
Feb 06, 2018
- Judge Ross Klein
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
ALAMILLO RODRIGUEZ VS. GOURMET SPECIALITIES, INC., ET. AL
Plaintiff Andrew Alamillo moves to compel production of documents sought pursuant to a subpoena for business records. This is an action for strict products liability and negligence. The product at issue is a “Ford 903 series, Model 22-63 post hole digger.” The subject subpoena was served upon CNH Industrial America, the custodian of records...
-
Hearing
Nov 08, 2016
- Judge Ross Klein
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
ALAMILLO RODRIGUEZ VS. GOURMET SPECIALITIES, INC., ET. AL
Ford Motor Company moves on the basis that its 1970s era post-hole digger was unforeseeably altered – a cover for the drive shaft (in which decedent’s jacket became entangled) had been removed. Although the Court is, at this time, inclined to continue the hearing in order for Defendants to comply with Judge Conway’s discovery recommendation...
-
Hearing
Dec 19, 2017
- Judge Ross Klein
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
ALAMILLO RODRIGUEZ VS. GOURMET SPECIALITIES, INC., ET. AL
Plaintiff Andrew Alamillo Rodriguez moves the Court for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. He states three reasons for seeking leave: He wants to remove certain Defendants from certain Causes of Action;He wants to add certain Defendants to his Cause of Action for Failure to Provide Workers Compensation Insurance; andHe wants to “clarif...
-
Hearing
Feb 22, 2018
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
ALAMILLO RODRIGUEZ VS. GOURMET SPECIALITIES, INC., ET. AL
Plaintiff Andrew Alamillo Rodriguez moves the Court for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. He states three reasons for seeking leave: He wants to remove certain Defendants from certain Causes of Action; He wants to add certain Defendants to his Cause of Action for Failure to Provide Workers Compensation Insurance; and He want...
-
Hearing
Feb 06, 2018
- Judge Ross Klein
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
MARK J SCHOENING VS. KAUFMAN AND BROAD
No appearance is required under the following conditions: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal - Case Management Program continued to 03/14/2013 at 08:30 in this department. An Attorney Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to hearing. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Ma...
-
Hearing
Jan 08, 2013
- Judge Gerrit W. Wood
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE
No appearance is required under the following conditions: The Court ordered this matter continued to the following date and time: The Status Conference - Complex is scheduled for 08/15/2014 at 03:00 PM in Department 35. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Lo...
-
Hearing
May 05, 2014
- Judge Alan G. Perkins
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE
No appearance is required under the following conditions: It appears from Defendant Forecast Group LP's Case Management Statement that the entire action has been settled and should be ready to be dismissed in sixty days. Therefore, the trail date of April 4, 2016 and the Mandatory Settlement Conference date of February 26, 2016 are each vacated...
-
Hearing
Nov 30, 2015
- Judge Alan G. Perkins
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE
Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, plaintiffs' motion to consolidate Labra v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-2014-00157593 with Pope v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-2012-00131115 for all purposes including trial is GRANTED. Pope v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-00131115 shall be the lead case. All future filings shall be made in t...
-
Hearing
Mar 24, 2014
- Judge Robert C. Hight
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE
Below is the tentative ruling for the hearing on March 11, 2016. The Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal-Complex set on March 11, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. is continued to March 18, 2016 at 3:30 p.m., in Department 35. Pleadings still need to be dismissed by: Amended Complaint by Cook, Robert 05/21/2013, First Amended Cross-Complaint by Forecast ...
-
Hearing
Mar 07, 2016
- Judge Alan G. Perkins
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE
Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, plaintiffs Pope's motion to consolidate Pope v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-2012-00131115 with Carrion v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-2012-00137761 for all purposes including trial is GRANTED. Pope v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-2012-00131115 shall be the lead case. All future filings shall...
-
Hearing
Jun 24, 2013
- Judge Robert C. Hight
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE
Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed intervener, Financial Pacific Insurance Company's, motion to intervene is granted. Intervener's pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The court finds good cause for intervention as intervener is insurer...
-
Hearing
Nov 07, 2014
- Judge Robert C. Hight
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE
No appearance is required under the following conditions: The above-entitled action is transferred to department 35 for consideration for complex designation. The plaintiff is ordered to contact the clerk in department 35 at (916) 874-7885 to select a date for hearing. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Manag...
-
Hearing
Feb 21, 2013
- Judge David W. Abbott
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE
Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed interveners, Assurance Company of America and Maryland Casualty's (collectively Zurich) motion to intervene is granted. Interveners' pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The court finds good cause for ...
-
Hearing
Dec 01, 2014
- Judge Robert C. Hight
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE
Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed intervener Financial Pacific Insurance Company's motion to intervene is GRANTED. Intervener's pleadings in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The court finds good cause for intervention as intervener is the insu...
-
Hearing
Jun 09, 2014
- Judge Robert C. Hight
-
County
Sacramento County, CA
MARIO CRISOSTOMO VS VERMONT KTWON LLC ET AL
Hearing Date: September 20, 2018 Calendar No: 9 Case Name: Mario Crisostomo, et al. v. Vermont Ktown, LLC, et al. Case No.: BC705307 Motion: (1) Demurrer to Complaint (2) Motion to Strike Moving Party: (1) Defendants Jonathan Wintner and Alan Stern (2) Defendants Vermont Ktown, LLC; Winstar Properties, LLC; Jonathan ...
-
Hearing
Sep 20, 2018
- Judge John P. Doyle
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
THE MARK CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS THE MARK CONDOMINIUMS LLC [E-FILE]
The court addresses the evidentiary issues. Cross-Defendant Tremco Incorporated's request for judicial notice is granted. Defendant/Cross-Complainant Hensel Phelps Construction Co.'s request for judicial notice is granted. Hensel Phelps' evidentiary objections are all overruled because the objected to testimony is not specified. Fibreboard Paper Pr...
-
Hearing
Aug 24, 2017
-
Type
Complex
-
Sub Type
Writ
- Judge Ronald L. Styn
-
County
San Diego County, CA
THE MARK CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS THE MARK CONDOMINIUMS LLC [E-FILE]
The court rules as follows on Plaintiff The Mark Condominium Owners Association's demurrer to Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant Ecco Heating Products, Ltd.'s First Roe Amendment to Cross-Complaint. There is no record in the court file of ECCO having filed a First Roe Amendment to Cross-Complaint. Absent an operative pleading, The Mark...
-
Hearing
Mar 09, 2017
-
Type
Complex
-
Sub Type
Writ
- Judge Ronald L. Styn
-
County
San Diego County, CA
THE MARK CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS THE MARK CONDOMINIUMS LLC [E-FILE]
Cross-Defendant Tremco Incorporated's demurrer to the Second Amended Cross-Complaint of Defendant/Cross-Complainant Hensel Phelps Construction Co. is sustained. Tremco demurrers to the Thirteenth Cause of Action – Breach of Express Warranty. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co. (1954) 42 Cal.2d 682 explains. . . . . The general rule is that privity of ...
-
Hearing
Mar 29, 2017
-
Type
Complex
-
Sub Type
Writ
- Judge Ronald L. Styn
-
County
San Diego County, CA
LAWLEY VS BANK OF AMERICA NA [E-FILED]
The unopposed demurrer to complaint, filed by defendants Bank of America, N.A.; Bank of America Corporation; Countrywide Financial Corporation; Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.; ReconTrust Company, N.A; CTC Real Estate Services; and Landsafe, Inc., is sustained without leave to amend. As plaintiffs have not filed an opposition, it appears that they con...
-
Hearing
Feb 09, 2017
-
Type
Real Property
-
Sub Type
other
- Judge Katherine Bacal
-
County
San Diego County, CA
« first previous 1 ... 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 next last »