Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

4226-4250 of results

JAMES HITES VS. K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES NORTHERN INC

Appearance is required. Notice: Given the circumstances presented by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, this hearing will be conducted remotely via Zoom [which includes telephonic and teleconferencing options]. The Department 41 Zoom link is: https://saccourt.zoom.us/my/dept41a. The Zoom ID is: 349 373 7884. The Zoom number is (888) 475-449...

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

JAMES HITES VS. K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES NORTHERN INC

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed intervenor, Financial Pacific Insurance Company's, motion to intervene is granted. Intervenor's pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The Court finds good cause for intervention as intervenor is insurer...

  • Hearing

    Feb 05, 2019

JAMES HITES VS. K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES NORTHERN INC

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed intervenor, Financial Pacific Insurance Company's, motion to intervene is granted. Intervenor's pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The Court finds good cause for intervention as intervenor is insurer...

  • Hearing

    Feb 05, 2019

JAMES HITES VS. K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES NORTHERN INC

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed intervenor, Financial Pacific Insurance Company's, motion to intervene is granted. Intervenor's pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The Court finds good cause for intervention as intervenor is insurer...

  • Hearing

    Feb 05, 2019

JAMES HITES VS. K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES NORTHERN INC

Appearance required. The case management conference hearing on Friday, January 8, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. is confirmed. The parties are required to appear. Given the circumstances presented by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, this hearing will be conducted remotely via Zoom [which includes telephonic and teleconferencing options]. The Department 4...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

ALAMILLO RODRIGUEZ VS. GOURMET SPECIALITIES, INC., ET. AL

Plaintiff Andrew Alamillo Rodriguez moves the Court for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. He states three reasons for seeking leave: He wants to remove certain Defendants from certain Causes of Action;He wants to add certain Defendants to his Cause of Action for Failure to Provide Workers Compensation Insurance; andHe wants to “clarif...

  • Hearing

    Feb 06, 2018

ALAMILLO RODRIGUEZ VS. GOURMET SPECIALITIES, INC., ET. AL

Plaintiff Andrew Alamillo moves to compel production of documents sought pursuant to a subpoena for business records. This is an action for strict products liability and negligence. The product at issue is a “Ford 903 series, Model 22-63 post hole digger.” The subject subpoena was served upon CNH Industrial America, the custodian of records...

  • Hearing

    Nov 08, 2016

ALAMILLO RODRIGUEZ VS. GOURMET SPECIALITIES, INC., ET. AL

Ford Motor Company moves on the basis that its 1970s era post-hole digger was unforeseeably altered – a cover for the drive shaft (in which decedent’s jacket became entangled) had been removed. Although the Court is, at this time, inclined to continue the hearing in order for Defendants to comply with Judge Conway’s discovery recommendation...

  • Hearing

    Dec 19, 2017

ALAMILLO RODRIGUEZ VS. GOURMET SPECIALITIES, INC., ET. AL

Plaintiff Andrew Alamillo Rodriguez moves the Court for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. He states three reasons for seeking leave: He wants to remove certain Defendants from certain Causes of Action;He wants to add certain Defendants to his Cause of Action for Failure to Provide Workers Compensation Insurance; andHe wants to “clarif...

  • Hearing

    Feb 22, 2018

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ALAMILLO RODRIGUEZ VS. GOURMET SPECIALITIES, INC., ET. AL

Plaintiff Andrew Alamillo Rodriguez moves the Court for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. He states three reasons for seeking leave: He wants to remove certain Defendants from certain Causes of Action; He wants to add certain Defendants to his Cause of Action for Failure to Provide Workers Compensation Insurance; and He want...

  • Hearing

    Feb 06, 2018

MARK J SCHOENING VS. KAUFMAN AND BROAD

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal - Case Management Program continued to 03/14/2013 at 08:30 in this department. An Attorney Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to hearing. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Ma...

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2013

BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE

No appearance is required under the following conditions: The Court ordered this matter continued to the following date and time: The Status Conference - Complex is scheduled for 08/15/2014 at 03:00 PM in Department 35. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Lo...

  • Hearing

    May 05, 2014

BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE

No appearance is required under the following conditions: It appears from Defendant Forecast Group LP's Case Management Statement that the entire action has been settled and should be ready to be dismissed in sixty days. Therefore, the trail date of April 4, 2016 and the Mandatory Settlement Conference date of February 26, 2016 are each vacated...

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2015

BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, plaintiffs' motion to consolidate Labra v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-2014-00157593 with Pope v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-2012-00131115 for all purposes including trial is GRANTED. Pope v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-00131115 shall be the lead case. All future filings shall be made in t...

  • Hearing

    Mar 24, 2014

BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE

Below is the tentative ruling for the hearing on March 11, 2016. The Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal-Complex set on March 11, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. is continued to March 18, 2016 at 3:30 p.m., in Department 35. Pleadings still need to be dismissed by: Amended Complaint by Cook, Robert 05/21/2013, First Amended Cross-Complaint by Forecast ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 07, 2016

BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, plaintiffs Pope's motion to consolidate Pope v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-2012-00131115 with Carrion v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-2012-00137761 for all purposes including trial is GRANTED. Pope v. The Forecast Group, No. 34-2012-00131115 shall be the lead case. All future filings shall...

  • Hearing

    Jun 24, 2013

BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed intervener, Financial Pacific Insurance Company's, motion to intervene is granted. Intervener's pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The court finds good cause for intervention as intervener is insurer...

  • Hearing

    Nov 07, 2014

BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE

No appearance is required under the following conditions: The above-entitled action is transferred to department 35 for consideration for complex designation. The plaintiff is ordered to contact the clerk in department 35 at (916) 874-7885 to select a date for hearing. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Manag...

  • Hearing

    Feb 21, 2013

BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed interveners, Assurance Company of America and Maryland Casualty's (collectively Zurich) motion to intervene is granted. Interveners' pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The court finds good cause for ...

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2014

BENJAMIN POPE VS. FORECAST GROUP LP, THE

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed intervener Financial Pacific Insurance Company's motion to intervene is GRANTED. Intervener's pleadings in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. The court finds good cause for intervention as intervener is the insu...

  • Hearing

    Jun 09, 2014

MARIO CRISOSTOMO VS VERMONT KTWON LLC ET AL

Hearing Date: September 20, 2018 Calendar No: 9 Case Name: Mario Crisostomo, et al. v. Vermont Ktown, LLC, et al. Case No.: BC705307 Motion: (1) Demurrer to Complaint (2) Motion to Strike Moving Party: (1) Defendants Jonathan Wintner and Alan Stern (2) Defendants Vermont Ktown, LLC; Winstar Properties, LLC; Jonathan ...

  • Hearing

    Sep 20, 2018

THE MARK CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS THE MARK CONDOMINIUMS LLC [E-FILE]

The court addresses the evidentiary issues. Cross-Defendant Tremco Incorporated's request for judicial notice is granted. Defendant/Cross-Complainant Hensel Phelps Construction Co.'s request for judicial notice is granted. Hensel Phelps' evidentiary objections are all overruled because the objected to testimony is not specified. Fibreboard Paper Pr...

  • Hearing

    Aug 24, 2017

  • Type

    Complex

  • Sub Type

    Writ

THE MARK CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS THE MARK CONDOMINIUMS LLC [E-FILE]

The court rules as follows on Plaintiff The Mark Condominium Owners Association's demurrer to Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant Ecco Heating Products, Ltd.'s First Roe Amendment to Cross-Complaint. There is no record in the court file of ECCO having filed a First Roe Amendment to Cross-Complaint. Absent an operative pleading, The Mark...

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2017

  • Type

    Complex

  • Sub Type

    Writ

THE MARK CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS THE MARK CONDOMINIUMS LLC [E-FILE]

Cross-Defendant Tremco Incorporated's demurrer to the Second Amended Cross-Complaint of Defendant/Cross-Complainant Hensel Phelps Construction Co. is sustained. Tremco demurrers to the Thirteenth Cause of Action – Breach of Express Warranty. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co. (1954) 42 Cal.2d 682 explains. . . . . The general rule is that privity of ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 29, 2017

  • Type

    Complex

  • Sub Type

    Writ

LAWLEY VS BANK OF AMERICA NA [E-FILED]

The unopposed demurrer to complaint, filed by defendants Bank of America, N.A.; Bank of America Corporation; Countrywide Financial Corporation; Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.; ReconTrust Company, N.A; CTC Real Estate Services; and Landsafe, Inc., is sustained without leave to amend. As plaintiffs have not filed an opposition, it appears that they con...

  • Hearing

    Feb 09, 2017

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

  « first    1 ... 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.