Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

BURNETT VS. ELLIOTT

Burnett also states that her cousin said that he helped defendant Kimberley Gomez remove assets from the storage unit. (Burnett decl. ¶ 12.) In their motion, each defendant declares that “I have had no contacts with the State of California and I deny the claims of plaintiff Crystal Burnett alleged in her complaint.” (Elliott decl. ¶ 4; Gomez decl. ¶ 4.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2018

ALEXANDER I LOPEZ ET AL VS PDS TRUCKING INC ET AL

The Court notes that plaintiff allege, somewhat cryptically, that “Gomez Law Group and Rivera have a conflict of interest related to disputes in other pending actions. Gomez Plaintiffs are happy to provide additional information upon request. Thus, it is appropriate to permit the attorneys to conduct separate trials for their respective clients.” (Motion, p. 16:14-17.) The court will be happy to hear further about this “conflict of interest” at the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Feb 22, 2017

RUBEN GARCIA VS. JESUS GOMEZ

GOMEZ CASE NO.: VC067214 HEARING: 10/25/18 #11 TENTATIVE ORDER Defendants JESUS GOMEZ and WEST COAST CATERING TRUCK’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is CONTINUED to Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. SE-C. CCP §430.41 Moving Party to give notice. Moving Defendants are ORDERED to comply with CCP §430.41. If, after complying with CCP §430.41, court intervention is needed, the parties may appear and argue the merits on the continued hearing date.

  • Hearing

    Oct 25, 2018

PATRICIA GOMEZ VS FCA US LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Patricia Gomez, Plaintiff, Case No.: 19STCV00216 v. [Tentative] Ruling FCA US LLC, et al. Defendants. Hearing Date: August 7, 2020 Department 49, Judge Stuart M.

  • Hearing

    Aug 07, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

PATRICIA GOMEZ, ET AL. VS ADELA IRIMES, ET AL.

Tentative Ruling Patricia Gomez et al. v. Adela Irimes Case No. 20SMCV00986 Hearing Date September 30, 2020 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (UNOPPOSED) Analysis/Background Plaintiffs are suing their landlord, defendant Adela Irimes, for fraud and violation of Culver City’s Rent Stabilization Ordinance, claiming defendant filed a fraudulent notice to vacate.

  • Hearing

    Sep 30, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

RUBEN COVARRUBIAS ET AL VS DAVID GOMEZ

DAVID GOMEZ, ET AL., Defendant(s). CASE NO: BC646138 [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION WITH A FEMALE CHAPERONE PRESENT Dept. 92 1:30 p.m. November 17, 2017 Plaintiffs, Ruben and Maria Covarrubias filed this action against Defendant, David Gomez for damages arising out of an automobile accident. Defendant seeks to conduct an IME of Plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

GERI GOMEZ VS JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA LLC ET AL

geri gomez, Plaintiff, v. jaguar land rover north america llc, et. al. Defendants. Case No.: BC666292 Hearing Date: April 13, 2018 [TENTATIVE] order RE: plaintiff’s motion to compel VERIFIED RESPONSES AND COMPLIANCE WITH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BACKGROUND This is a lemon law case filed by Plaintiff Geri Gomez (“Plaintiff’) due to various alleged defects in a vehicle manufactured by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover of North America, LLC (“Defendant.”)

  • Hearing

    Apr 13, 2018

GOMEZ V. SUNRISE MEDICAL US LLC

The truth of the matters specified in the requests for admission (set one) is to be deemed admitted, unless Plaintiff Arnulfo Gomez serves, before the hearing, a proposed response to the requests for admission that is in substantial compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.220.

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2017

HORTENCIA GOMEZ VS ABB PREHEATER INC ET AL

Gomez . . . [w]e’re speaking for all the people that came before Ms. Gomez.” Even after an objection to that statement was sustained, counsel reiterated “[w]e’re speaking for the people that were hurt in the same way as Mrs. Gomez.” Third, counsel argued “the only way to make this company listen . . . is to say yes [on the verdict form].” All three statements were objected to and sustained.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2018

VANESSA D FRAZIER VS HAWAIIAN GARDENS CASINO

., ¶¶3-5, 10; Gomez Decl., ¶¶3-4.) In fact, custodians Alicia Rodriguez and Milagros Gomez were in the restroom while Plaintiff used the toilet, washed her hands, and left. (SS UMF Nos. 7-11; Rodriguez Decl., ¶¶6-14; Gomez Decl., ¶¶5-14.) Both custodians saw Plaintiff leave the bathroom, and she did not appear upset. (SS UMF No. 13; Rodriguez Decl., ¶13; Gomez Decl., ¶13.) The custodians’ account of Plaintiff’s visit to the bathroom is corroborated by Defendant’s video surveillance.

  • Hearing

    Jan 24, 2019

  • Judge

    Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE VS SANTOSCARILLO, KATIA LIVETTE

The motion before the Court is in actuality six motions – a motion to compel Santoscarillo to respond to interrogatories; a motion to compel Santoscarillo to respond to request for production of documents; a motion to deem request for admissions as to Santoscarillo admitted; a motion to compel Gomez to respond to interrogatories; a motion to compel Gomez to respond to request for production of documents; and a motion to deem request for admissions as to Gomez admitted.

  • Hearing

    Sep 11, 2017

  • Judge

    Elaine Lu or Georgina Torres Rizk

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

PAWNEE LEASING, A CORPORATION VS SO CAL CATER TRUCK INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

.: 19NWCV00731 HEARING: 12/19/19 #3 TENTATIVE ORDER Plaintiff PAWNEE LEASING’s unopposed application for right to attach order against Defendants SO CAL CATER TRUCK, INC. and JORGE NOE GOMEZ is GRANTED. The amount of the writ is $72,468.25 and an undertaking of $10,000 is ordered as provided for by statute. (CCP § 489.220.) Moving Party to give Notice. No Opposition(s) filed as of December 17, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Dec 19, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

GOMEZ V PLA-ART INTERNATIONAL INC

For example, asking whether Chavez signed the back of checks issued to Victoria Gomez is different that admitting that he did so "without the knowledge and consent of VICTORIA GOMEZ." Chavez claims that Plaintiffs are simply attempting to avoid taking a deposition of Chavez. While it may be true that some of the questions could ultimately be duplicative of questions raised in a deposition, Plaintiffs have the right to do such discovery and to question Chavez about his responses.

  • Hearing

    Sep 27, 2018

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

GOMEZ V PLA-ART INTERNATIONAL INC

For example, asking whether Chavez signed the back of checks issued to Victoria Gomez is different that admitting that he did so "without the knowledge and consent of VICTORIA GOMEZ." Chavez claims that Plaintiffs are simply attempting to avoid taking a deposition of Chavez. While it may be true that some of the questions could ultimately be duplicative of questions raised in a deposition, Plaintiffs have the right to do such discovery and to question Chavez about his responses.

  • Hearing

    Sep 27, 2018

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

ANGEL DIAZ, ET AL. VS ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM/WEST, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION, ET AL.

(“Thompson” and collectively the “Defendants”) resulting in the death of Decedent Sonia Gomez-Diaz (“Decedent”) on or about January 10, 2018. Plaintiff Angel Diaz, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Sonia Gomez-Diaz (“Plaintiff”) filed his Complaint on January 07, 2019, alleging three causes of action sounding in (1) Medical Malpractice, (2) General Negligence, and (3) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (“NIED”).

  • Hearing

    Dec 20, 2019

GONZALEZ VS GOMEZ

In response, Rodriguez filed a cross-complaint and now a first amended cross-complaint (“FAXC”) against several parties including the moving Cross-Defendants Eduardo Gomez, Araceli Gomez and Lalo (collectively “Cross Defendants”) alleging defamation by slander. Summary of Motion: Cross-Defendants seeks summary judgment of Rodriquez’ FAXC (only the first cause of action for defamation by slander is asserted against them).

  • Hearing

    Jul 25, 2019

TD BANKS USA NA VS. RHODES, MARGARET A

Gomez shall appear personally to address these issues. UD-18-000326 – IREIT TURLOCK BLOSSOM VALLEY LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS. BABAZADEH, ROMINA – Plaintiff’s Motion to File Second Amended Complaint – GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2018

CARL KARCHER WAGE AND HOUR CASES

Gomez will give notice of this ruling to the Coleman [Bruce Anticouni] and Henderson (Peter Hart] cases counsel so that they will be available to participate in that decision on 4/20 at 9:30 am. Mr. Gomez is requested to make sure Mr. Hart and Mr. Anticouni have a copy of the case management conference order previously filed in this case.

  • Hearing

    Apr 20, 2010

PETITION OF GIOVAANA YALITZA VELAZQUEZ MOLINA

LR 7.112 Note: Opposition filed by Sharon Elliot and Kimberley Gomez 2-18-20. CRYSTAL DIANE BURNETT JERRY DWAYNE GORMAN JR KIMBERLEY GOMEZ SHARON ELLIOT FILED ON 02/14/20 BY JACQUELINE COULTER-PEEBLES PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.112 3.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

IN THE MATTER OF MARCUS GOMEZ

Gomez as conservator of the estate, because it is evident she will never be able to adequately account without significant investment of court resources during each and every accounting period. (See Prob.C. §§ 2650 (a), (c) and (i).) The only concern is that estate assets may be insufficient to support a private professional. I am inclined to suspend the powers of Ms. Gomez as conservator of the estate in favor of a private professional who can render this estate in a proper fiduciary manner.

  • Hearing

    Mar 27, 2012

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

COUNTY OF SONOMA V. DALLEY FAMILY 1999 REVOCABLE TRUST

(Gomez decl., ¶14.) Ms. Gomez states that, as of the date of her declaration, the violations remain on the Property and have not been abated. (Gomez decl., ¶15.) First, this motion does not contain all documents required by Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1800. It does not contain mandatory form CIV-100 requesting a default judgment, a memorandum of costs and disbursements, or a declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant against whom judgment is sought.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

  • Judge

    Gary Nadler via Zoom

  • County

    Sonoma County, CA

DION CALHOUN VS. CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL BOARD

De Fehr, who is currently counsel for both Gomez and Calhoun, also initially represented both at the outset of the administrative appeal below but had to withdraw based on a conflict of interest shortly after the hearing before the ALJ commenced. Given that prior conflict, why is it now proper for Mr.

  • Hearing

    Sep 20, 2019

GOMEZ V PLA-ART INTERNATIONAL INC

For example, asking whether Chavez signed the back of checks issued to Victoria Gomez is different that admitting that he did so "without the knowledge and consent of VICTORIA GOMEZ." Chavez claims that Plaintiffs are simply attempting to avoid taking a deposition of Chavez. While it may be true that some of the questions could ultimately be duplicative of questions raised in a deposition, Plaintiffs have the right to do such discovery and to question Chavez about his responses.

  • Hearing

    Sep 27, 2018

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

ALDAPE, HALEY VS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CV-18-001967 – IN RE: GOMEZ, S. – Petition for Approval of Transfer of Payment Rights—HEARING REQUIRED. Ms. Gomez shall personally appear to advise the Court of the status of this matter. As the Court previously advised, further information is required in order for the Court to determine whether the transaction is “fair, reasonable, and in the payee’s best interest.” (Ins. Code §10139.5(b)(1)-(15).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2019

5

Gomez vs. Forsum

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2018

  « first    1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 178     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.