Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

FOSTER VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Ford Motor Company, Case No. 2014-00732295; 2. Beltran v. Ford Motor Company, Case No. 2014-00711940; 3. Berg vs Ford Motor Company, Case No. 2013-00664794; 4. Deangelis vs Ford Motor Company, Case No. 2013-00679795; 5. Foster v. Ford Motor Company, Case No. 2013-00650304; 6. Guinn vs Ford Motor Company, Case No. 2013-00676722; 7. Hendrickson v. Ford Motor Company, Case No. 2014-00726226; 8. Hodges v. Ford Motor Company, Case No. 2014-00712422; 9. Krupsky vs Ford Motor Company, Case No. 2013-00662411; 10.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2018

CURREY V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Defendant Ford Motor Company waived all objections by failing to timely object to this combined deposition. See, C.C.P. § 2025.410. Also, on the merits, defendant Ford Motor Company failed to establish that any of its objections had merit. See, Coy v. Superior Court (1962) 58 Cal.2d 210, 202 to 221. Of note, it appears that plaintiff Currey is willing not to depose Erich Kemnitz, Wiliam G. Ballard and Eric L. Kalis if defendant Ford Motor Company will not call any of these witnesses at trial.

  • Hearing

    May 03, 2018

ZOE HOWARD VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Ford Motor Company Case No.: BC671415 Motion: Motion to Stay Moving Party: Defendant Ford Motor Company Responding Party: Unopposed Tentative Ruling: The Court will issue a ruling on the Motion at the hearing. Defendant Ford Motor Company seeks to stay the action in light of the fact that the Plaintiff is a member of the settlement class to Vargas v.

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2017

NEUBLE V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ()

Motion to Compel Answers at PMK Deposition The plaintiff filed a motion to compel answers at the deposition of the person most knowledgeable for Ford Motor Company. The defendant Ford Motor Company indicates that it has now discovered additional documents and will make the person most knowledgeable available. The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer prior to the hearing as to the deposition date. If the parties cannot agree on one the court will set it unilaterally.

  • Hearing

    Mar 29, 2018

CARLOS, MARICHELE G. VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY

of Document; Request for Sanctions against Ford Motor Company and its Counsel of Record Richard J May, ESQ. in the Amount of $2,672.50 - a), b), and c) DROPPED at the request of the moving parties as the case has settled.

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2018

NEUBLE V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Motion to Compel Answers at PMK Deposition The plaintiff filed a motion to compel answers at the deposition of the person most knowledgeable for Ford Motor Company. The defendant Ford Motor Company indicates that it has now discovered additional documents and will make the person most knowledgeable available. The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer prior to the hearing as to the deposition date. If the parties cannot agree on one the court will set it unilaterally.

  • Hearing

    Mar 29, 2018

***TRANSFERRED TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY*** WILLIAM BARNES VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL

Defendants Ford Motor Company And Palm Springs Motors, Inc'S Demurrer To 1st Amended Complaint Matter on calendar for Wednesday, November 30, 2016, Line 13, Defendants Ford Motor Company And Palm Springs Motors, Inc's Demurrer To 1st Amended Complaint. Judge Stewart tentatively rules that the matter is taken off calendar pursuant to the court's ruling on Defendants Ford Motor Company and Palm Springs Motors, Inc.' motion to transfer venue. (See Pickwick Stages System v.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2016

MANUEL GUERRA VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Ford Motor Company Case No.: BC657128 Motion: Motion to Disqualify Moving Party: Defendant Ford Motor Company Responding Party: Unopposed Tentative Ruling: The Motion is granted.

  • Hearing

    Dec 15, 2017

RAY T ROMERO VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Ford Motor Company Case No.: BC668474 Motion: Motion to Tax Costs Moving Party: Defendant Ford Motor Company Opposing Party: Plaintiff Ray T. Romero Tentative Ruling: The Motion is granted in part.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2018

ALFRED R HARRISON VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Ford Motor Company Case No.: BC654998 Motion: Motion to Disqualify Moving Party: Defendant Ford Motor Company Responding Party: Plaintiff Alfred Harrison Tentative Ruling: The Motion is denied.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2017

JERRY L HUGHES ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BHC) ET AL

Ford Motor Company & General Motors Corporation'S Amended Joinder In Mtn To Stay Action Based On Forum Non Conveniens DEFENDANTS FORD MOTOR COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION'S Amended Joinder In Motion To Stay Action Based On Forum Non Conveniens --- DENIED FOR FAILURE TO SUSTAIN BURDEN 1008 RE FORUM NON CONVENIENS. (302/REQ/JT)

  • Hearing

    Feb 10, 2005

FELICIA DECK ET AL VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL

Notice Of Joinder To Motion To Transfer Venue Filed By Ford Motor Company Set for hearing on Tuesday, October 4, 2016, Line 17, DEFENDANT JOHNSON FORD D/B/A ANTELOPE VALLEY FORD LINCOLN's Joinder To Motion To Transfer Venue Filed By Ford Motor Company

  • Hearing

    Oct 04, 2016

EVELYN BERENA JIMINEZ VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Ford Motor Company Case No.: BC655747 Motion: Demurrer; Motion to Strike Moving Party: Defendant Ford Motor Company Responding Party: Plaintiff Berena-Jiminez Tentative Ruling: The Demurrer is sustained, with twenty days leave to amend. The Motion to Strike is granted.

  • Hearing

    Jun 15, 2017

JAVIER MEDRANO VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Case No.: BC613926 Hearing Date: April 24, 2017 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL PMQ DEPOSITION OF FORD MOTOR COMPANY BACKGROUND Plaintiff Javier Medrano (“Plaintiff”) brings an action against Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”), asserting causes of action for arising out of the Beverly-Song Act.

  • Hearing

    Apr 24, 2017

ERNEST SNYDER VS ABEX CORP*

Ntc Of Joinder & Joinder In Defts Ford Motor Company And General Motors Company'S Mo To Dismiss Set for hearing on Friday, August 29, 2008, line 1. DEFENDANT MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC'S Joinder In Defendants Ford Motor Company And General Motors Company's Motion To Dismiss is granted. No opposition filed. =(302/PJM)

  • Hearing

    Aug 29, 2008

ROBERT BARRY VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL

Notice Of Joinder To Motion To Transfer Venue Filed By Ford Motor Company Matter on calendar for Tuesday, October 25, 2016, Line 12, DEFENDANT FUTURE FORD, INC. D/B/A FUTURE FORD LINCOLN Joinder To Motion To Transfer Venue Filed By Ford Motor Company. The matter is taken off calendar in light of the ruling on the motion sought to be joined. =(302/HK)

  • Hearing

    Oct 25, 2016

ROSEMARY MARTIN VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL

Notice Of Joinder To Motion To Transfer Venue Filed By Ford Motor Company Matter on calendar for Tuesday, October 25, 2016, Line 11, DEFENDANT FUTURE FORD, INC. D/B/A FUTURE FORD OF CLOVIS Joinder To Motion To Transfer Venue Filed By Ford Motor Company. The matter is taken off calendar in light of the ruling on the motion sought to be joined. =(302/HK)

  • Hearing

    Oct 25, 2016

TIMOTHY T DEVENS ET AL VS FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL

Ford Motor Company Case No.: BC612914 Motion: Motion for Summary Judgment/Summary Adjudication Moving Party: Defendant Ford Motor Company and Galpin Motors, Inc. Opposing Party: Plaintiffs Timothy and Harold Devens Tentative Ruling: The Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Summary Adjudication is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2017

FELICIA DECK ET AL VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL

Notice Of Joinder To Motion To Transfer Venue Filed By Ford Motor Company Matter on calendar for Tuesday, October 25, 2016, Line 14, DEFENDANT JOHNSON FORD D/B/A ANTELOPE VALLEY FORD LINCOLN Joinder To Motion To Transfer Venue Filed By Ford Motor Company. The matter is taken off calendar in light of the ruling on the motion sought to be joined. =(302/HK)

  • Hearing

    Oct 25, 2016

LOFTIS VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

This motion is not the first motion this Court has seen involving Ford Focus plaintiffs and Ford Motor Company. In fact, in November 2016, this Court heard a nearly identical motion to compel and Ford's motion for a protective order in the matter known as Powers v. Ford Motor Company, San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2015-42602. The Court takes judicial notice of those two motions.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

LOFTIS VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

This motion is not the first motion this Court has seen involving Ford Focus plaintiffs and Ford Motor Company. In fact, in November 2016, this Court heard a nearly identical motion to compel and Ford's motion for a protective order in the matter known as Powers v. Ford Motor Company, San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2015-42602. The Court takes judicial notice of those two motions.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

LOFTIS VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

This motion is not the first motion this Court has seen involving Ford Focus plaintiffs and Ford Motor Company. In fact, in November 2016, this Court heard a nearly identical motion to compel and Ford's motion for a protective order in the matter known as Powers v. Ford Motor Company, San Diego Superior Court Case No. 2015-42602. The Court takes judicial notice of those two motions.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JAY BURTON SKEWES ET AL VS. AMERICAN OPTICAL DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION ET AL**CASE TRANSFERRED TO VENTURA COUNTY**

Joinder In Defts Chrysler Llc, Ford Motor Company And General Motors Corporation'S Mo For Mandatory Change Of Venue And Request For Stay Set for hearing on Monday, October 27, 2008, line 3. DEFENDANT PNEUMO ABEX LLC'S Joinder In Defendants Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor Company And General Motors Corporation's Motion For Mandatory Change Of Venue And Request For Stay is granted. =(302/HEK/JW)

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2008

JAY BURTON SKEWES ET AL VS. AMERICAN OPTICAL DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION ET AL**CASE TRANSFERRED TO VENTURA COUNTY**

Joinder To Defts Chrysler Llc, Ford Motor Company And General Motors Corporation'S Mo For Mandatory Change Of Venue And Request For Stay Set for hearing on Monday, October 27, 2008, line 3. DEFENDANT MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES COMPANY'S Joinder To Defendants Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor Company And General Motors Corporation's Motion For Mandatory Change Of Venue And Request For Stay is granted. =(302/HEK/JW)

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2008

BRUCE GLEASON VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ET AL

Defendant American Biltrite Inc.S Joinder In Defendants Ford Motor Company And General Motors Companys Motion To Dismiss Or Stay Action For Forum Non Conveniens Per C.C.P. 410.3 Set for hearing on Monday, May 11, 2009, line 2, DEFENDANT AMERICAN BILTRITE INC.'S Joinder In Defendants Ford Motor Company And General Motors Companys Motion To Dismiss Or Stay Action For Forum Non Conveniens Per C.C.P. 410.30.

  • Hearing

    May 11, 2009

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 381     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.