Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

LE'ELDRED PALM SR VS ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC ET AL

ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC, et al., Defendants. Case No.: BC716319 Hearing Date: November 15, 2018 [TENTATIVE] order RE: Application for an order permitting CAITLIN MORGAN to appear as counsel pro hac vice Caitlin Morgan (“Morgan”) applies to appear as counsel pro hac vice for defendant Enterprise Holdings Inc. The motion is unopposed.

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2018

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

LE'ELDRED PALM SR VS ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC ET AL

ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL. CASE NO.: BC716319 HEARING: 04/23/19 JUDGE: KRISTIN S. ESCALANTE #5 TENTATIVE ORDER Defendant Enterprise Holdings, Inc.’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is OVERRULED on ground of uncertainty, and SUSTAINED with 10 days leave to amend as to the 1st – 7th causes of action against Defendant Enterprise Holdings, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Apr 23, 2019

RODELA VS ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR

No proof of service of Second Amended Complaint on Defendants Ranck, Elko Administrative Services, EAN Holdings LLC, or Enterprise Holdings Inc. has been filed in 60+ days. CRC 3.110(c). JTD status of service/dismissal of these defendants. If case at issue, JTD dates for Mediation and 2-day jury trial. 18-month track

  • Hearing

    Jan 02, 2015

  • Judge

    Miles Lang

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

IXCHELLE SCOTT VS JEREMY WIDENER

In addition, Plaintiff identifies Enterprise Holdings Inc., a Missouri Corporation, and Rental Insurance Services, a Missouri Corporation, in the introduction of the complaint although they are not named in the caption. Based on the pleadings, it not clear how these parties are proper parties to this action. The Complaint does not indicate how either of these parties have interest in the suit as Defendant Jeremy Widener was not driving a rental vehicle from either companies at the time of the incident.

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

LE'ELDRED PALM SR VS ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC ET AL

. , Plaintiff, v. enterprise holdings, inc., et al. , Defendants Case No.: BC716319 ORDER TRANSFERRING NON-PERSONAL INJURY (PI) CASE TO AN INDEPENDENT CALENDAR (IC) COURT DEPARTMENT 5 OF THE PERSONAL INJURY (PI) COURT HAS DETERMINED THAT THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION: IS NOT A “PERSONAL INJURY” CASE AS DEFINED IN THE COURT’S MOST RECENT GENERAL ORDER RE GENERAL JURISDICTION PERSONAL INJURY CASES – FILING LOCATION. THIS CASE IS HEREBY SENT TO DEPARTMENT ONE FOR REASSIGNMENT TO AN IC COURT.

  • Hearing

    Feb 07, 2019

LE'ELDRED PALM SR VS ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC ET AL

Defendant ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC.’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. II. Defendant FLETCHER JONES MOTOR CARS, INC.’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. Moving Party to give notice. This action was filed by Plaintiff (in pro per) LE’ELDRED PALM SR on July 31, 2018. The relevant facts, as alleged, are as follows: Plaintiff alleges that he is a dark skin African American man. (TAC, ¶ 28.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 22, 2019

ERIC BELLINGER VS ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC ET AL

BACKGROUND On January 29, 2018, plaintiff Eric Bellinger filed a complaint against Enterprise Holdings, Inc., EAN Holdings, LLC, and Shedena Zakiyyah Hooper for negligence based on a motor vehicle accident that occurred on October 5, 2017. On May 10, 2018, plaintiff filed an amendment designating Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles, LLC as Doe 1.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2020

IVAN BAUTISTA ET AL VS VERONICA MORRISON ET AL

Demurrer to the Complaint by Defendants, Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and Enterprise Rent-A-Car, filed on 10/28/16, is OVERRULED. Defendants are ordered to answer within 10 days. Defendants have not established that the complaint is preempted by the Graves Amendment.

  • Hearing

    Jan 17, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

RODOLFO GARCIA-MONTUFAR VS ANDREINA ESCOBAR ET AL

CASE NO: BC629990 [TENTATIVE] ORDER SUSTAINING DEMURRER WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND Plaintiff, Rodolfo Garcia-Montufar filed this action against Defendants, Andreina Escobar, EAN Holdings, LLC, Enterprise Holdings, Inc., and National Car Rental for damages arising out of an automobile accident. At this time, EAN and Enterprise demur to the complaint, contending it fails to state a cause of action against them due to the application of the Graves Amendment, codified at 49 USC §30106(a).

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

LAUREN LAKE VS EMA HAMZI MADANI ET AL

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES On January 18, 2018, Plaintiff Lauren Lake (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Emad Hamzi Madani (“Madani”), Enterprise Rent-A-Car, and Enterprise Holdings, Inc. (collectively, “Enterprise”) for negligence arising out of a September 13, 2016 automobile accident. Madani, a “foreign renter,” rented a vehicle from Enterprise and hit Plaintiff, a pedestrian, while driving the Enterprise-owned car.

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2019

ERIC BELLINGER VS ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC ET AL

BACKGROUND On January 29, 2018, plaintiff Eric Bellinger filed a complaint against Enterprise Holdings, Inc., EAN Holdings, LLC, and Shedena Zakiyyah Hooper for negligence based on a motor vehicle accident that occurred on October 5, 2017. On May 10, 2018, plaintiff filed an amendment designating Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles, LLC as Doe 1. Trial is set for February 3, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Sep 06, 2019

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JIBRIL SHAHID VS ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR ET AL

BACKGROUND On April 19, 2018, plaintiff Jabril Shahid (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against defendants Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles, LLC (erroneously sued as Enterprise Rent-A-Car and Enterprise), Enterprise Holdings, Inc., EAN Holdings LLC., and Nick Walter Cannon Moody (“Defendants”).

  • Hearing

    Apr 23, 2019

JAMES HENRY, ET AL. VS SHARON GAYE WELCH, ET AL.

It is not clear how long Plaintiff worked for Enterprise Holdings, Inc. If Plaintiff worked there for more than five years prior to the accident, discovery must be limited to the five-year prior pre-dating the accident; all records subsequent to the accident are discoverable. e. Employment Records The remainder of the subpoena seeks to discover Plaintiff’s non-medical employment records. Plaintiff correctly notes his employment records are protected by his right to privacy.

  • Hearing

    Oct 18, 2019

ERIC BELLINGER VS ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC ET AL

BACKGROUND On January 29, 2018, plaintiff Eric Bellinger filed a complaint against Enterprise Holdings, Inc., EAN Holdings, LLC, and Shedena Zakiyyah Hooper for negligence based on a motor vehicle accident that occurred on October 5, 2017. DISCUSSION Plaintiff requests that the court quash the deposition subpoenas for production of business records to several medical providers, insurance companies, his high school, and his former employer.

  • Hearing

    May 14, 2019

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

BACKGROUND On January 29, 2018, plaintiff Eric Bellinger filed a complaint against Enterprise Holdings, Inc., EAN Holdings, LLC, and Shedena Zakiyyah Hooper for negligence based on a motor vehicle accident that occurred on October 5, 2017. DISCUSSION Plaintiff requests that the court quash the deposition subpoenas for production of business records to several medical providers, insurance companies, his high school, and his former employer.

  • Hearing

    May 14, 2019

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MANUELA MERCADO VS ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC ET AL

Enterprise holdings inc. , et al.; Defendants. Case No.: BC686965 Hearing Date: July 10, 2018 [TENTATIVE] order RE: Demurrer to complaint MOVING PARTY: Defendant, Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles LLC RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff, Manuela Mercado The court has considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MELGOZA, JUAN VS. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC.

Defendants’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, with Request for Sanctions - GRANTED, in part; DENIED, in part. The Court finds that Defendant is entitled to an order requiring Plaintiff to serve verifications to Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Amended Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One. ...

  • Hearing

    Apr 24, 2018

TAMARA EVANS VS. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Available dates can be obtained on the court's web site...

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2014

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

BRANDON LOWER VS. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Available dates can be obtained on the court's web site...

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

BRANDON LOWER VS. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Available dates can be obtained on the court's web site...

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

BRANDON LOWER VS. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC

Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Cross-Complaint of Michael L Delaurenti or In Pro Per for Cross-Complaint of Michael L Delaurenti is required. Absent an Appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non-Compliance could result in Dismissal without Prejudice...

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

BRANDON LOWER VS. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Available dates can be obtained on the court's web site...

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

BRANDON LOWER VS. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Available dates can be obtained on the court's web site...

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

BRANDON LOWER VS. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC

Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Cross-Complaint of Michael L Delaurenti or In Pro Per for Cross-Complaint of Michael L Delaurenti is required. Absent an Appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non-Compliance could result in Dismissal without Prejudice...

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

ERIC BELLINGER VS ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INC ET AL

ORDER TRANSFERRING PERSONAL INJURY (PI) CASE TO INDEPENDENT CALENDAR (IC) COURT AFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Department 4B of the Personal Injury (PI) Court has determined that the above entitled action is complicated based upon the number of pretrial hearings and/or the complexity of the issues prese...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2019

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1 2 3 4     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.