Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

JHENE GUTIERREZ, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MAGDALENA SANTANA, ET AL. VS LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

Blumenthal was named as Doe 3 in an Amendment to Complaint; however, concerning Does 1-50, the complaint states these doe defendants were physicians and surgeons, holding themselves out as duly licensed to practice their profession under the laws of California. (Compl. ¿ 4.) The complaint contains no further factual allegations concerning Does 1-50, nor any allegations concerning Blumenthal’s alleged negligence.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

JIANHUA JIN VS YIYANG LIU

Co. and Does 1-50 for: 1. Defamation—Slander/Libel 2. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 3. Fraud—Intentional Misrepresentation 4. Negligent Misrepresentation 5. Fraud—Concealment 6. Fraud—Promise Without Intent to Perform 7. Constructive Fraud 8. Breach of Contract 9. Breach of Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing 10. Conversion 11. California Business and Professions Code Section 17200 12. Civil Conspiracy On 10/29/18, Liu’s and GSI’s defaults were entered.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

CHENG YANG VS JTNA ENTERPRISES, LLC

On November 14, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendant and Does 1-50 for: Breach of Contract False Promise Intentional Misrepresentation Concealment Common Count—Money Had and Received Unjust Enrichment Declaratory Relief On January 7, 2020, Defendant’s default was entered. A Case Management Conference is set for June 26, 2020. Discussion Defendant’s demurrer is TAKEN OFF-CALENDAR. Defendant’s default was entered on January 7, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ALDRIDGE VS. PEREZ-ESTRADA

In it, she asserted two causes of action against the City of Newport Beach, the Newport Beach Police Department, and Does 1-50: (1) general negligence and (2) violation of civil rights - Eighth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In this complaint, Plaintiff alleged being shackled, startled by Deputy Perez, and falling. Perez was not named as a defendant, however. After the limitations period had run, Plaintiff sought to add Defendant as a doe defendant.

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2017

DENICE SEALS VS SKYLAR MARISSA EISKOWITZ, ET AL.

SKYLAR MARISSA EISKOWITZ; THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION; FORD MOTOR FAIR SERVICING, LLC, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. CASE NO.: 20STCV21444 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S DEMURRER TO THE ANSWER Dept. 27 3:30 p.m. December 3, 2020 I.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

PRICE VS. FIDEL'S LITTLE MEXICO, INC.

Plaintiff alleges "Defendants and DOES 1-50 became annoyed, aggravated, or irritated when they were continuously put on notice of Plaintiff Price's peanut allergy, and that Defendants and DOES 1-50 intentionally served Plaintiff Price contaminated good, knowingly and intentionally attempting to harm her." (See FAC para. 75) This is not a conclusory allegation but is a factual statement supporting the intent element of a battery claim.

  • Hearing

    Apr 13, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

SLV GOLF, LLC VS ZARUKA INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LLC

The complaint, filed 12/28/17, asserts causes of action against SLV, James Bellows and Does 1-50 for: 1. Slander of Title 2. Interference with Contract 3.

  • Hearing

    Aug 23, 2018

DANIEL MULLER VS FITNESS INTERNATIONAL LLC ET AL

February 2, 2018 Plaintiff, Daniel Muller filed this action against Defendants, Fitness International, LLC and Does 1-50 for damages arising out an attack by Doe Defendant, Aleksander Grigoriev on Fitness International’s premises. At this time, Fitness International has agreed to settle with Plaintiff for $5,000 in exchange for a dismissal with prejudice. Fitness International seeks an order from the Court finding that the settlement is in good faith.

  • Hearing

    Feb 02, 2018

ESTATE OF THOMAS ROZMIAREK ET AL VS BRIAN G DUFFY ET AL

., and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) Case No.: BC649400 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES Dept. 98 10:00 a.m. November 13, 2017 This is a wrongful death and products liability case arising out of the death of seven-year-old Thomas Rozmiarek. In March 2017, Plaintiffs served their first sets of Request for Production of Documents and Special Interrogatories. On May 10, 2017, Plaintiffs served their responses.

  • Hearing

    Nov 13, 2017

PRICE VS. FIDEL'S LITTLE MEXICO, INC.

Plaintiff alleges "Defendants and DOES 1-50 became annoyed, aggravated, or irritated when they were continuously put on notice of Plaintiff Price's peanut allergy, and that Defendants and DOES 1-50 intentionally served Plaintiff Price contaminated good, knowingly and intentionally attempting to harm her." (See FAC para. 75) This is not a conclusory allegation but is a factual statement supporting the intent element of a battery claim.

  • Hearing

    Apr 13, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE; KEELY BOSLER, in her official capacity as Director of the State of California Department of Finance; DOES 1-50, inclusive, and ROES 1-50 inclusive, Respondents and Defendants. Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE The hearing on the Petition for Writ of Mandate, which was reserved by the Court clerk for November 15, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in Department 28, is dropped from the Court’s calendar.

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2019

MOLLY'S FROZEN TREATS #43352 LLC VS EMPIRE CONSTRUCTION DEVE

Further, Plaintiff has failed to dismiss Defendants Does 1-50 named as defendants in the Complaint. Additionally, while the plaintiff requests entry of a default judgment in the amount of $281,007.14 plus costs, the Complaint only alleges that damages “are in excess of $25,000.00 the jurisdictional minimum” and will be sought “according to proof.” (Compl. ¶ 9.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Petitioner and FiaintifT, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE; K E E L Y BOSLER, in her official capacity as Director of the State of California Department of Finance; DOES 1-50, inclusive, and ROES 1-50 inclusive, Respondents and Defendants. Nature of Proceedings: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE The hearing on the Petition for Writ of Mandate, which was reserved by the Court clerk for November 15, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in Department 28, is dropped from the Court's calendar.

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2019

GARVEY AVENUE SOUTH, LLC VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF CALIFORNI

Does 1-50 have not been dismissed. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) 3. Because the principal is uncertain, calculation of attorney’s fees pursuant to the fee schedule is also uncertain. (Local Rule 3.214(a).)

  • Hearing

    Feb 21, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

LESLIE CHO VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL

.; and Does 1-50, Inclusive. At all times mentioned herein, the "fence" at Wilshire Grand Hotel was negligently designed, installed, inspected and maintained so as to cause creating a dangerous road upon which Plaintiff suffering substantial and serious Personal Injuries and damages.

  • Hearing

    Apr 16, 2019

SAUL ARREGUIN ET AL VS THAIWADHANA KASAORN

CIV-110) has been filed for all remaining defendants (including un-served Does 1-50). Plaintiff must file a CIV-110 as to Does 1-50. The Court may not enter judgment in an amount exceeding the amount demanded in the Complaint. (CCP 585(b).) The Court may not grant relief not demanded in the complaint by default judgment even though that relief otherwise would have been proper. (CCP § 580(a); Airs Aromatics, LLC v.

  • Hearing

    Oct 23, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ANNA AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLC VS. SANDAG

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a government agency; CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a government agency; METROPOEITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM, a government agency; NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT, a government agency; WSP USA, a New York corporation; KEEINFEEDER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, a California corporation; DOES 1-50, inclusive, is GRANTED IN PART and will be HEARD IN PART. Code Civ. Proc. 1048(a). The actions involve essentially the same parties.

  • Hearing

    Jun 27, 2018

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Breach

WILLIAM MARTIN VS MHVILLAGE INC. DBA LINDA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK, ET AL.

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE On February 11, 2019, Plaintiff William Martin (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants MHVillage, Inc. dba Linda Vista Mobile Home Park; Andrea Saia (“Saia”); and Does 1-50 for premises liability. On August 22, 2019, Defendant Linda Vista Park Partners, LLC (erroneously sued as MHVillage, Inc. dba Linda Vista Mobile Home Park) (“Defendant”) filed this motion to change venue from Los Angeles County to Riverside County.

  • Hearing

    Oct 09, 2019

KARLA DELGADO VS FRANKLIN PALMA ET AL

.: BC676352 Hearing Date: February 28, 2018 [TENTATIVE] order RE: petition for leave to file complaint in intervention This action arises out of an automobile accident that occurred on September 30, 2015, between Plaintiff Karla Delgado (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Franklin Palma, Franqui Palma, and Does 1-50 (“Defendants”). Plaintiff alleges Defendants caused the vehicle to be negligently operated so that it collided with Plaintiff Delgado’s vehicle and caused her injury.

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ANNA AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLC VS. SANDAG

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a government agency; CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a government agency; METROPOEITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM, a government agency; NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT, a government agency; WSP USA, a New York corporation; KEEINFEEDER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, a California corporation; DOES 1-50, inclusive, is GRANTED IN PART and will be HEARD IN PART. Code Civ. Proc. 1048(a). The actions involve essentially the same parties.

  • Hearing

    Jun 27, 2018

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CHRISTINA MENDEZ V. RICUCCIO A. NEGOM, DDS

COMPANY is, and at all times relevant hereto was, used by NEGOM and DOES 1-50 as mere shells and conduits for the conduct of certain of Defendants’ affairs, and is, and was, the alter ego of NEGOM and DOES 1-50. The recognition of the separate existence of COMPANY would not promotes justice, in that it would permit Defendants to insulate themselves from liability to Plaintiff[s] for violations of the California Government Code, the California Labor Code, and other statutory violations.

  • Hearing

    Sep 26, 2018

UNITED CALIFORNIA DISCOUNT CORP. VS D.W. PRINTING GROUP, INC

Lee, Oh, 24/7 Clothing, DW Import/Export, Siron, Showcase, Elite and Does 1-50 for: Breach of Contract Breach of Guaranty Fraud Conversion Fraudulent Transfer Unfair Business Practices On March 15, 2018, Elite’s default was entered. On March 16, 2018, 24/7’s and Showcase’s defaults were entered. On March 23, 2019, DW Import/Export’s, DW Printing’s and S. Lee’s defaults were entered. On November 27, 2018, K. Lee’s and Siron’s defaults were entered.

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ANNA AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLC VS. SANDAG

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a government agency; CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a government agency; METROPOEITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM, a government agency; NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT, a government agency; WSP USA, a New York corporation; KEEINFEEDER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, a California corporation; DOES 1-50, inclusive, is GRANTED IN PART and will be HEARD IN PART. Code Civ. Proc. 1048(a). The actions involve essentially the same parties.

  • Hearing

    Jun 27, 2018

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Breach

BARBARA A. CONTRERAS VS ROZCOR INC

Marmolejo dba Al-Mar Construction (“Marmolejo”), Wesco Insurance Company (“Wesco”), American Contractors Indemnity Company (“ACIC”) and Does 1-50 for: On April 19, 2018, Plaintiffs dismissed ACIC without prejudice. On May 18, 2018, Marmolejo filed his cross-complaint, asserted a cause of action against Plaintiffs and Roes 1-10 for: On August 6, 2018, Rozcor’s and Orozco’s defaults were entered. On October 31, 2018, Plaintiffs dismissed Wesco, without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2019

TASHAY LENZY VS DOES 1 TO 50

Does 1-50 Defendant Ralphs Grocery Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing: November 13, 2019 Plaintiff was injured by an elevator while working at a Ralphs store. She filed and settled a worker compensation claim. She sued Ralphs in Superior Court; Ralphs moves for summary judgment under workers’ compensation exclusivity of remedy. Cal. Lab Code §3600. Evidentiary Objections All evidentiary objections OVERRULED.

  • Hearing

    Nov 13, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.