Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

DAVID LAHYANI VS ROBERT SCOTT REHLING ET AL

In opposition, Plaintiff contends the complaint properly alleged claims against Defendant, Jane Doe, and Does 1-50, such that Plaintiff’s doe amendments relate back to the 7/17/18 filing of the complaint. Plaintiff asserts he was ignorant of the Maddy’s and Janeen’s true names at the time the complaint was filed, and thus, the doe amendments are proper and not barred by the statute of limitations.

  • Hearing

SANDRA VAUGHAN VS WESTERN MERCHANDISE EXPRESS INC ET AL

Carrasco (“Carrasco”) and DOES 1-50, asserts a cause of action for Negligence. On 9/29/15, plaintiff filed an Amendment to Complaint, wherein she substituted WMX Logistics, Inc. (“WMX”) in for DOE 1. Case No. BC 524257: Plaintiff Virginia Antonio (“Antonio”) is suing for damages arising out of the subject accident. The complaint was filed on 10/10/13.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

SANDRA VAUGHAN VS WESTERN MERCHANDISE EXPRESS INC ET AL

Carrasco (“Carrasco”) and DOES 1-50, asserts a cause of action for negligence. On 9/29/15, plaintiff filed an Amendment to Complaint, wherein she substituted WMX Logistics, Inc. (“WMX”) in for DOE 1. In case number BC524257, plaintiff Virginia Antonio (“Antonio”) seeks damages arising from the subject accident. The complaint was filed on 10/10/13.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

SEIDI PAKZAD VS ROSEANNE GERALDINE HILDUM

ROSEANNE GERALDINE HILDUM; and DOES 1-50, Defendants. CASE NO.: BC603884 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT DEPOSITION Dept. 98 1:30 p.m. August 30, 2017 On August 4, 2017, Plaintiff Seidi Pakzad (“Plaintiff”) filed this Motion to Compel Defendant Deposition.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

JOSE RAUL MANDUJANO PEREZ VS. LESLY ANNE SAENZ, ET AL

The first amended complaint (“FAC”), filed August 1, 2017, alleged the same operative facts as well as causes of action for: (1) fraud and deceit against all Defendants; (2) wrongful foreclosure against Deutsche Bank and Does 1-50; (3) setting aside trustee’s sale against Deutsche Bank and Does 1-50; (4) cancellation of instrument against Deutsche Bank and Does 1-50; and (5) quiet title against Deutsche Bank and Does 1-50.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

FRANCIS ZAGAJESKI VS ALLIANCE NURSING CENTERS INC

Does 1-50 have not been dismissed. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Plaintiff is not entitled to pre-judgment interest because damages are not certain and his right to recover did not vest until the date of judgment. (CC 3287(a).) Plaintiff is not entitled to recover costs for “Faxes and Copies” and “Administration Fee.” (CCP 1033.5(b).) Plaintiff may refile appropriate declarations and amended judgment for consideration at the next date – to be set today.

  • Hearing

JAIME PARTCH VS ANAWALT LUMBER & MATRIALS CO-MONTROSE

. – MONTROSE, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendant. CASE NO.: BC613637 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Dept. 98 1:30 p.m. November 8, 2017 Plaintiff’s counsel of record, Rachel E. Fishenfield and DAG Law Firm APC, seek to be relieved on grounds that there has been an irreparable breakdown of the attorney-client relationship, including a lack of cooperation by plaintiff.

  • Hearing

CHRISTINE FITZGERALD VS STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURAN

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; and DOES 1-50, inclusive Defendants. Case No.: BC627200 ORDER TRANSFERRING PERSONAL INJURY (PI) CASE TO INDEPENDENT CALENDAR (IC) COURT DEPARTMENT 98 OF THE PERSONAL INJURY (PI) COURT HAS DETERMINED THAT THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION IS: Not a personal injury case as defined in the Court’s most recent General Order re: General Jurisdiction Personal Injury cases.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

DONAHUE SCHRIBER REALTY GROUP LP VS. JUICE IT UP FRANCHISE CORPORATION

No appearance is required under the following conditions: The remaining defendants, Does 1-50, are dismissed from the complaint. The cross complaint of Pam Peake filed on 5/11/2009 is dismissed. The Court orders the entire action dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal is ordered pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1385. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Management Calendar, all tentative rulings shall become the final ruling of the court.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

INFUSIO LIFE LLC VS TARA HAVEN

TARA HAVEN, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO.: BC652311 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 8:30 a.m. October 10, 2018 Dept. 56 Plaintiff seeks to continue the trial date in this matter due to discovery friction. On July 16, 2018, three days after the Motion was filed, the Court granted Plaintiff’s ex parte application and continued the trial date in this matter to April 15, 2019. Accordingly, the Motion to Continue the Trial Date is DENIED as moot.

  • Hearing

REISNER MILLENNIUM INVESTMENTS, LLC VS. HASHEMI

As discussed below, the court will enter judgment if all other Defendants and Does 1-50 are dismissed. Merits If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement.

  • Hearing

TASHAY LENZY VS DOES 1 TO 50

DOES 1-50 , et al., Defendants. Case No.: BC650652 ORDER TRANSFERRING COMPLICATED PERSONAL INJURY (PI) CASE TO AN INDEPENDENT CALENDAR (IC) COURT After review of the court file, the Court makes the following order: Department 3 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled action is complicated based upon the number of pretrial hearings and/or the complexity of the issues presented.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

HIGH TOUCH, INC. VS. FAST REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS LLC, ET AL.

Defendant Home Renew, Inc. and Does 1-50 have been dismissed. The amount requested in the default judgment package does not exceed the amount requested in the Complaint. Additionally, the cost request appears proper. Issues First, the damages sought have not been properly substantiated. The court cannot rely on the attorney declaration of Mr. Tenner to support the damages requested where Mr. Tenner appears to have no personal knowledge or foundation to substantiate the damages.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

KENNETH C CLAWSON VS. RON ARMSTRONG

New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 The plaintiff shall diligently proceed to name and/or dismiss defendants, Does 1-50, prior to the next hearing. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Management Calendar, all tentative rulings shall become the final ruling of the court.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

EASY 2 BUY LOGISTIC INC VS TYCOONS ENTERPRISE GROUP LLC

The First Amended Complaint, filed 5/17/17, asserts causes of action against Defendants RTS, Easy 2 Buy, Huang and DOES 1-50 for: Breach of Contract Declaratory Relief On 5/25/17, the court consolidated this case with Case No. KC069089.

  • Hearing

ELEAZOR MIRON VS ALPHA BETA COMPANY

ALPHA BETA COMPANY, a corporation, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO.: BC590324 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Dept. 98 1:30 p.m. January 23, 2018 Rachel E. Fishenfeld and the Law Offices of Daniel A. Gibalevich, attorneys of record for Plaintiff Eleazor Miron (“Plaintiff”), seek to be relieved as counsel on grounds there has been an irreparable breakdown of the working relationship between Plaintiff and counsel.

  • Hearing

BELOV VS. IRAHETA

Plaintiff alleged that Does 1- 50 were his employees but not allege that they were negligent. Labor Code 3706 does permit Plaintiff to sue his employers for negligence, but Plaintiff failed to do so. Plaintiff can easily allege that his employers were negligent. The negligence of driver Vladislav can be imputed to the employers.

  • Hearing

ELEAZOR MIRON VS ALPHA BETA COMPANY

ALPHA BETA COMPANY, a corporation, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: BC590324 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Dept. 98 1:30 p.m. January 23, 2018 Rachel E. Fishenfeld and the Law Offices of Daniel A. Gibalevich, attorneys of record for Plaintiff Eleazor Miron (“Plaintiff”), seek to be relieved as counsel on grounds there has been an irreparable breakdown of the working relationship between Plaintiff and counsel.

  • Hearing

HARD PROPERTY LLC ET AL VS SOUTHCOAST ELEVATOR & ESCALATOR C

Plaintiffs have submitted a Request for Dismissal as to Does 1-50 but Defendant Barnum was named as Doe 1 and a request for judgment has been presented as to Defendant Barnum. Plaintiffs may bring a supplemental declaration to the hearing to address the issues described above and they may modify the Request for Dismissal to exclude Doe 1 if they wish to do so. DATED: December 5, 2017 _____________________________ Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

GOMEZ, ET AL. V. TURFEVOLUTIONS, ET AL.

The court denies without prejudice Plaintiffs Carlos Gomez, Amada Jellow, Marcus Futch, Edwin Palma, Pablo Sanchez, Angel Diaz, Abjoulaye Ly, Hector Rosales, John Daclan and Ruben Segura’s motion to set aside their February 16, 2018 dismissal of DOES 1-50. Each fact in the memorandum of facts should be based on evidence attached to the motion, followed by a precise reference to such evidence. (Smith, Smith & Kring v.

  • Hearing

GRETCHEN GOLDHAMMER VS BIRKLEY ASHTON BAKER

The second amended complaint added Does 1-50 as a defendant on page 1 ¶ 1, but the complaint already intended to include Doe defendants on p. 2 ¶ 6. Also, the second amended complaint changed who is excepted as a competent adult under p. 1 ¶ 3. As for the first amended complaint, the only difference with the second amended complaint appears to be the inclusion of Does 1-50 on p. 1 ¶ 1.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE VS TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP ET AL

Truck Insurance claims a right to recover on the following theories: C/A 1: Against Tyco, Aztec, Does 1-50 for Strict Product Liability C/A 2: Against Tyco, Aztec, Dunn, and Does 1-50 for Negligence On March 1, 2018, Truck Insurance filed the present motion to consolidate this case with the three related cases. On March 16, 2018, plaintiff in Case No. BC644986 (Braunstein) filed an opposition in that case number, not the motion case number. And plaintiff in Case No.

  • Hearing

LYDIA VELASCO VS SUNNOVA ENERGY CORPORATION

., Emilio Estevez and Does 1-50 for: Fraud Rescission of Contract On February 15, 2019, the court sustained The Sunnova Defendants’ demurrer to the SAC, with 10 days’ leave to amend. On March 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint, asserting the same causes of action alleged in the SAC. A Case Management Conference is set for April 19, 2019. Discussion Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Second Amended Complaint is TAKEN OFF-CALENDAR as MOOT.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JIANHUA JIN VS YIYANG LIU

Co. and Does 1-50 for: 1. Defamation—Slander/Libel 2. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 3. Fraud—Intentional Misrepresentation 4. Negligent Misrepresentation 5. Fraud—Concealment 6. Fraud—Promise Without Intent to Perform 7. Constructive Fraud 8. Breach of Contract 9. Breach of Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing 10. Conversion 11. California Business and Professions Code Section 17200 12. Civil Conspiracy On 10/29/18, Liu’s and GSI’s defaults were entered.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

CHENG YANG VS JTNA ENTERPRISES, LLC

On November 14, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendant and Does 1-50 for: Breach of Contract False Promise Intentional Misrepresentation Concealment Common Count—Money Had and Received Unjust Enrichment Declaratory Relief On January 7, 2020, Defendant’s default was entered. A Case Management Conference is set for June 26, 2020. Discussion Defendant’s demurrer is TAKEN OFF-CALENDAR. Defendant’s default was entered on January 7, 2020.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.