Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

1-25 of 223,186 results

GOLDIE JAZMIN LEON ET AL VS BRETT JOSEPH DIMARIO

They further allege that Defendant Brett Joseph Dimario and Does 1-25 were the operators of the motor vehicle; that Does 1-25 employed Dimario and Does 1-25, and that Dimario and Does 1-25 were acting in the course and scope of employment; that Does 1-25 owned the motor vehicle that was operated by Demario and Does 1-25 with permission; that Does 1-25 negligently entrusted the motor vehicle to Dimario and Does 1-25; and that Does 1-25 were the agents and employees of other defendants and acted within the course

  • Hearing

    Nov 27, 2019

LORENA BELMAN VS. GARCIA AND GALLARZO PROPERTY H0LDINGS, LLC

Labor Code §§2800 and 2802 (against all joint employers including Does 1-10) (7) Seventh Cause of Action: Failure to Provide Itemized Statement to Employee – Violation of Labor Code §226 (against all joint employers includes Does 1-10) (8) Eighth Cause of Action – Violation of Labor Code §3602 (against all Defendants Including Does 1-10) (9) Ninth Cause of Action Premises Liability (against all Defendants including Does 1-10) CCP § 430.41(a), effective for demurrers filed on or after January 1, 2016, requires

  • Hearing

    Apr 04, 2017

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

RYAN REARDON VS SMOKE DEPOT

Defendants, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, knew of the risk that the E-cigarette would explode and knowingly failed to take steps to design and manufacture a safer product, or warn consumers of such known risks. Defendants, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, placed profit over safety and knowingly decided to forego safer designs because of decisions to cut corners and costs. 42.

  • Hearing

    Dec 15, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

RYAN REARDON VS SMOKE DEPOT

Defendants, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, knew of the risk that the E-cigarette would explode and knowingly failed to take steps to design and manufacture a safer product, or warn consumers of such known risks. Defendants, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, placed profit over safety and knowingly decided to forego safer designs because of decisions to cut corners and costs. 42.

  • Hearing

    Dec 15, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO VS SHERMINEH FATEM

Defendants Shermineh Fatemi, Arezo Fatemi, and Does 1-10.

  • Hearing

    Jan 03, 2019

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

GOMEZ, ET AL. V. TURFEVOLUTIONS, ET AL.

Section 473 is applicable because the dismissal of the Does 1-50 is the equivalent of a default. Relief is mandatory because there is an attorney affidavit of fault. (Beeman v. Burling (1990) 216 Cal.App.3d 1586, 1604.) Here, Plaintiffs’ Counsel Allen V. Feghali now properly declares in a sworn declaration that he accidentally dismissed Does 1-50 when he in fact meant to dismiss Does 5-50.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2018

GOMEZ, ET AL. V. TURFEVOLUTIONS, ET AL.

Section 473 is applicable because the dismissal of the Does 1-50 is the equivalent of a default. Relief is mandatory because there is an attorney affidavit of fault. (Beeman v. Burling (1990) 216 Cal.App.3d 1586, 1604.) Here, Plaintiffs’ Counsel Allen V. Feghali now properly declares in a sworn declaration that he accidentally dismissed Does 1-50 when he in fact meant to dismiss Does 5-50.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2018

BERTHA BARRERA RAMIREZ VS. CITY OF OXNARD

The OSC for sanctions/dismissal for failure to file proof of service/publication re Does 1 and 2, set on 10/16/19, is vacated. Proofs as of service as to Does 1 and 2, were filed on 9/11/19. An OSC for sanctions/dismissal for failure to file request for default/responsive pleading as to Does 1 and 2 is set for 11/15/19, at 8:15 am in Dept. 22B . Notice to be provided by plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2019

  • Judge

    Genalin Riley

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

BERTHA BARRERA RAMIREZ VS. CITY OF OXNARD

The OSC for sanctions/dismissal for failure to file proof of service/publication re Does 1 and 2, set on 10/16/19, is vacated. Proofs as of service as to Does 1 and 2, were filed on 9/11/19. An OSC for sanctions/dismissal for failure to file request for default/responsive pleading as to Does 1 and 2 is set for 11/15/19, at 8:15 am in Dept. 22B . Notice to be provided by plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2019

  • Judge

    Genalin Riley

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

JOEL ROBINSON VS CENTURY EVALUATION MEDICAL SERVICES INC ET

On 9/18/19, in connection with a request for default judgment, Plaintiff filed a request for dismissal of does 1-100. The clerk’s office processed the dismissal the same day. The Court denied Plaintiff’s request for default judgment without prejudice, noting, “Plaintiff must have the dismissal of Does 1 and 2 vacated if he wishes to obtain a default judgment against Donaldson and/or Davis.”

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2020

LORENA BELMAN VS. GARCIA AND GALLARZO PROPERTY H0LDINGS, LLC

Labor Code §§2800 and 2802 (against all joint employers including Does 1-10) (7) Seventh Cause of Action: Failure to Provide Itemized Statement to Employee – Violation of Labor Code §226 (against all joint employers includes Does 1-10) (8) Eighth Cause of Action – Violation of Labor Code §3602 (against all Defendants Including Does 1-10) (9) Ninth Cause of Action Premises Liability (against all Defendants including Does 1-10) The demurring Defendants herein, KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, KAISER FOUNDATION

  • Hearing

    May 02, 2017

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

DAMMON TURNER VS MV TRANSPORTATION, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

., and Does 1 – 10 (San Joaquin County Superior Court Case # STK-CV-UOE-2017-1446) pending in Department 11B of the Court (the “Adams” action); • Crista Sanchez, an individual, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. MV Transportation, Inc., and Does 1 – 50 (Alameda County Superior Court Case #RG17886784) pending in Department 17 of the Court (the “Sanchez” action); • Jene White, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated v.

  • Hearing

    Mar 18, 2019

BEATRIZ GASPAR VS BUBBLE DEVINE BAKERIES INC ET AL

, (3) Employers and/or DOES 1-20 are a mere continuation of the other Defendants, or (4) the transfer of assets to Employers and/or DOES 1-20 is for the fraudulent purpose of escaping liability for Defendants' debts.

  • Hearing

    Jan 10, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

BEATRIZ GASPAR VS BUBBLE DEVINE BAKERIES INC ET AL

, (3) Employers and/or DOES 1-20 are a mere continuation of the other Defendants, or (4) the transfer of assets to Employers and/or DOES 1-20 is for the fraudulent purpose of escaping liability for Defendants' debts.

  • Hearing

    Jan 10, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Here, Does 1-500 have been part of the case since its inception, and the SAC identifies each “new” defendant as one of Does 1-13. Because Does 1-13 have been parties all along, Turner’s argument is without merit. The Court additionally notes that Does 1-13 would likely be surprised to learn they were dismissed from the action in 2013, given that they were litigating summary judgment motions as recently as April 2019. Turner’s motion to strike the allegations pertaining to “new” defendants is denied. II.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2019

JEFFREY HOLMES VS JOHN DOE 1, ET AL.

Plaintiff alleged facts suggesting John Doe 1, John Doe 2, and/or Does 1-25, knew that Plaintiff was allergic to meat, but intentionally served him meat. (Complaint ¶55.) Plaintiff alleged John Doe 1, John Doe 2, and/or Does 1-25 intentionally and maliciously committed the act with the intent to deliberately inflict humiliation, mental anguish, and emotional and physical distress upon Plaintiff. (Complaint ¶55.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 13, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JOSEPH M. HOATS VS MARIA FELIX BRICENO

The First Amended Complaint, filed on 5/25/17, asserts causes of action against Defendant Maria Felix Briceno (“Briceno”) and Does 1-10 for: On 7/3/17, plaintiff dismissed her third cause of action, without prejudice. On 8/1/17, plaintiff dismissed her fourth cause of action, without prejudice. On 8/30/17, Briceno filed her cross-complaint, asserting a cause of action against plaintiff and Does 1-5 for Breach of Fiduciary Duties.

  • Hearing

    Apr 02, 2018

DOME CENTER, LLC VS SUGAR DADDY BAKERY AND CAFE, LLC,

On December 3, 2018, Plaintiff Dome Center, LLC filed the instant action against Defendant Sugar Daddy Bakery and Café, LLC and Does 1 through 20. On February 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) adding Defendants Duane Poole; Franke Bonventre; and Does 21 through 100. The FAC asserts causes of action for: Breach of Lease; and Breach of Guaranty.

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

JOSEPH M. HOATS VS MARIA FELIX BRICENO

The First Amended Complaint, filed on 5/25/17, asserts causes of action against Defendant Maria Felix Briceno (“Briceno”) and Does 1-10 for: On 7/3/17, plaintiff dismissed her third cause of action, without prejudice. On 8/1/17, plaintiff dismissed her fourth cause of action, without prejudice. On 8/30/17, Briceno filed her cross-complaint, asserting a cause of action against plaintiff and Does 1-5 for Breach of Fiduciary Duties.

  • Hearing

    Apr 09, 2018

EULOGIO GARCIA VS BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF CALIFORNIA INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

(“Republic”); Chris Coyle; Tyson Ross; and Does 1 to 100. The Complaint asserts causes of action for: Discrimination Based on Race, Ancestry, National Origin, and Association with Someone of a Protected Class (against BFI, Republic, and Does 1-100); Age Discrimination (against BFI, Republic, and Does 1-100); Disability Discrimination (against BFI, Republic, and Does 1-100); Failure to Prevent Discrimination and Harassment (against BFI, Republic, and Does 1-100); Harassment – Gov.

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

RITA MAE AMOROSA VS. STUDIO MOVIE GRILL

The OSC re sanctions/dismissal for failure to file default as to Does 1 and 2, set on 10/16/19, is vacated. Does 1 and 2 filed answers to the complaint. Notice to be provided by plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2019

  • Judge

    Genalin Riley

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

JOSE RAUL MANDUJANO PEREZ VS. LESLY ANNE SAENZ, ET AL

The first amended complaint (“FAC”), filed August 1, 2017, alleges causes of action for: (1) fraud and deceit against all Defendants; (2) wrongful foreclosure against Deutsche Bank and Does 1-50; (3) setting aside trustee’s sale against Deutsche Bank and Does 1-50; (4) cancellation of instrument against Deutsche Bank and Does 1-50; and (5) quiet title against Deutsche Bank and Does 1-50. RELIEF REQUESTED: Defendants Milestone Mortgage and Realty Group, Inc. (“Milestone”) and La Hacienda Realty, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Jan 18, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

JIMENEZ V. SEIDENSTICKER

Paragraph MV-2(d) states: “The defendants who entrusted the motor vehicle are (names): Does 1 to 50, Inclusive.” The allegation that Behr entrusted a vehicle that it may have owned or co-owned is not inconsistent. Accordingly, Behr’s request to strike paragraph MV-2(d) is DENIED. Paragraph MV-2(e) states: “The defendants who were the agents and employees of the other defendants and acted within the scope of the agency were (names): JOHN SEIDENSTICKER, and: Does 1 to 50, Inclusive.”

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2019

DOME CENTER, LLC VS SUGAR DADDY BAKERY AND CAFE, LLC,

On December 3, 2018, Plaintiff Dome Center, LLC filed the instant action against Defendant Sugar Daddy Bakery and Café, LLC and Does 1 through 20. On February 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) adding Defendants Duane Poole; Franke Bonventre; and Does 21 through 100. The FAC asserts causes of action for: Breach of Lease; and Breach of Guaranty.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

BERTHA BARRERA RAMIREZ VS. CITY OF OXNARD

The OSC for sanctions/dismissal for failure to file request for default/responsive pleading as to Does 1 and 2, set on 12/16/19, is vacated. Does 1 and 2 filed an answer on 12/11/19. Notice to be provided by plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Dec 16, 2019

  • Judge

    Genalin Riley

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.