Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

Get an alert with new cases related to: "DOES 1"

BHP HOLDING PARTNERS, LTD. VS ALEJANDRO BORJAS, ET AL.

[OK] Judgment Included (Conform to L.R. 3.0; 8.96): [ ] Other: TENTATIVE: [X] GRANT: [ ] same as requested: Amount: $101,432.74 [X] reduced: Reduce attorney’s fees by $17,159.35 [X] Other: CONDITIONED UPON submitting a request for dismissal of Does 1 -50.

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

RANDY CHEW VS NGOCLAN THI NGUYEN

CIV-110) for all remaining defendants (including un-served Does 1-50). Plaintiff has also failed to file a proposed judgment on Judicial Council Form No. JUD-100. Prior to the commencement of the hearing on November 5, 2020, Plaintiff is to electronically file a request for dismissal (Judicial Council Form No. CIV-110) for Does 1-50 and a proposed judgment on Judicial Council Form No. JUD-100. Otherwise, Plaintiff’s request for entry of default judgment will be denied without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INC VS GLOBAL BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES CO

CIV-110) for all remaining defendants (including un-served Does, Does 1-10). Due to the one-judgment rule, Plaintiff must file a request for dismissal (Judicial Council Form No. CIV-110) of all remaining defendants (Does 1-10) before October 13, 2020 at 9:30 am.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ARMAN YURDUMYAN, ET AL. VS MASSOUD KHAZAIE

Here, the complaint alleges in relevant part: Prior to the collision at issue herein, Defendants MASSOUD KHAZAIE and DOES 1 to 20, and each of them, engaged in what Defendant MASSOUD KHAZAIE and DOES 1 to 20, and each of them, described to the investigating police officer after the collision as a "road rage incident."

  • Hearing

    Apr 08, 2021

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS LUCILLE ROBINSON

Robinson (“Defendant”) and Does 1-10 for: Common Counts On January 22, 2021, Defendant’s default was entered. A Case Management Conference is set for March 18, 2021. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is GRANTED, contingent upon Plaintiff’s filing of a Request for Dismissal of Does 1-10.[1] ANALYSIS Yes (1/22/21) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 18, 2021

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. VS ANAHIT ATOYAN

On June 17, 2019, Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. filed the instant action against Defendant Anahit Atoyan and Does 1 through 10. The Complaint asserts a single cause of action for Common Counts. On September 16, 2019, default was entered as to Defendant and Does 1 through 10 were dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff seeks judgment against Defendant in the total amount of $29,231.92 consisting of $28,627.92 in damages and $604.00 in costs.

  • Hearing

    Dec 13, 2019

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

ZHOU HUA RONG ET AL VS. LARRY WEI ET AL

Notice Of Plaintiffs Motion For Leave To File Designation Of Does 1 11 To First Amended Complaint In Case Cgc-14-538601 Real Property/Housing Motion Calendar for Tuesday, September 07, 2016, Line 2 ( Part 1 of 3).

  • Hearing

    Sep 07, 2016

MINT COLLECTION -410-418 JESSIE STREET CONDOMINIUM VS. FIFTH HISTORIC PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL

Notice Of Motion For Leave To Substitute Patrick Mcnerney As Does 1 And 101 And Veritas Investments Inc As Does 2 And 102 Set for hearing on Tuesday, September 4, 2018, Line 1, PLAINTIFF MINT COLLECTION -410-418 JESSIE STREET CONDOMINIUM's Motion For Leave To Substitute Patrick Mcnerney As Does 1 And 101 And Veritas Investments Inc As Does 2 And 102 Plaintiff Mint Collection-410-418 Jessie Street Condominium Owners' Association's motion for leave to substitute Patrick McNerney as Does 1 and 101 and Veritas

  • Hearing

    Sep 04, 2018

ZHOU HUA RONG ET AL VS. LARRY WEI ET AL

Notice Of Plaintiffs Motion For Leave To File Designation Of Does 1 11 To First Amended Complaint In Case Cgc-14-538601 Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday September 27, 2016, line 1 PLAINTIFF ZHOU RONG, JUN-YI ZHAO, MING ZHAO Notice Of Plaintiffs Motion For Leave To File Designation Of Does 1 11 To First Amended Complaint In Case Cgc-14-538601 is OFF CALENDAR, First Amended Complaint filed on November 4, 2014 is no longer the operative complaint in this action.

  • Hearing

    Sep 27, 2016

PATSY ESCANUELAS VS SODERBERG MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

, oppressive and despicable and were done in willful and conscious disregard of the rights, welfare and safety of Plaintiff, and were done by managerial agents and employees of Defendants, and each of them, and DOES 1 through 100, and with the express knowledge, consent, and ratification of managerial agents and employees of Defendants, and each of them, and DOES 1 through 100, thereby justifying the awarding of punitive and exemplary damages in an amount to be determined at the time of trial”); (4) Page 19,

  • Hearing

    Dec 18, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

TINA L KALB VS. STANLEY M BATISTE MD

The Court has received Plaintiff's Case Management Statement and Request for Dismissal relating to Defendant William Cook Europe, APS, and Does 1-60. The Court orders that no appearance is required under the following conditions: The Court shall direct the clerk to enter Plaintiff's Request for Dismissal with prejudice of Defendant William Cook Europe, APS, and Does 1-60. Upon such entry, all defendants shall have been dismissed. No further hearings shall be scheduled.

  • Hearing

    Jun 09, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

ANGELA H NAHAPETIAN VS COUNTRY VILLA GLENDALE HEALTHCARE CEN

The original complaint named Country Villa Glendale Healthcare Center and Does 1-20. When Plaintiff filed her FAC, she named CV Operating Company, LLC and Does 1-20. At that time, the FAC was improperly pled against CV Operating Company, LLC, because more than two years had passed since the incident and CV Operating Company, LLC was not named as a doe defendant. The FAC was, however, properly pled at that time against Does 1-20.

  • Hearing

    Oct 25, 2016

KEVIN STILLMAN VS GOLDEN EMPIRE MORTGAGE INC

., Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC (“Carrington Mortgage”), Carrington Foreclosure Services, LLC (“Carrington Foreclosure”) and Does 1-16. On 8/10/18, plaintiff filed an “Amendment to Complaint,” wherein Preeminent Investment Corporation was purportedly substituted in lieu of Does 1-16. On 8/22/18, Golden Empire filed its answer. On 9/12/18, Carrington Mortgage’s and Carrington Foreclosure’s defaults were entered. A Case Management Conference is set for 10/23/18.

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2018

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

HULAC-WEST, LLC VS ROYAL DINING CATERING, INC

.; Orlando Martinez; and Does 1 to 10. The Complaint asserts a single cause of action for breach of contract. On August 10, 2018, default was entered as to Defendants Royal Dining Catering, Inc. and Orlando Martinez. On October 30, 2019, Does 1 to 10 were dismissed without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Dec 30, 2019

SBK HOLDINGS USA INC VS EDGAR SARGSYAN ET AL

1-50), (6) unfair competition (against Edgar, Regdalin Aviation, Regdalin Properties, and Does 1-50), (7) accounting (against Edgar, Regdalin Aviation, Regdalin Properties, and Does 1-50), (8) violation of Penal Code section 496, subdivision (a) (against Edgar, Regdalin Aviation, Regdalin Properties, and Does 1-50), and (9) legal malpractice (against Edgar, PLG, and Does 1-50.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 31, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

FRANK BREDICE, DC VS BORELLI, TARA

However, the Court sent a Notice of Rejection to counsel, stating that no request for dismissal had been filed for the remaining defendants Kouladjian and Does 1-25. Thereafter, Plaintiffs settled with Kouladjian and dismissed the action as against him. On December 15, 2016, counsel submitted a Request for Dismissal of Does 1-25, with prejudice. In a Declaration dated February 21, 2017, Jeffrey S.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2017

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

  • Judge

    Elaine Lu or Yolanda Orozco

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

SIANO VS. PUFFY DELIVERY, INC.

The FAC also names Does 1-50. “Puffy” and Does 1-50 are collectively defined as “Defendants.” (Ibid.) Although the three Named Defendants are alleged in the prefatory paragraph to be separate California corporations, paragraph 10 of the FAC converts “Puffy” into a single California corporation (emphasis added): Plaintiffs are informed, believe and thereon allege that, at all relevant times, Puffy was and is a California corporation with its principal executive office located in Orange County.

  • Hearing

    Dec 20, 2019

LILIAN DEMONTECERDE HOATS VS MARIA FELIX BRICENO

On June 21, 2017, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Briceno and Does 1-10 for: On October 23, 2017, Defendant filed a cross-complaint, asserting causes of action against Plaintiff, Cross-Defendants Lilian Demonteverde Hoats, Sergio Gomez Gonzalez and Does 1-5 for: On October 30, 2017, the court related this case to Case No. KC069267 and designated Case No. KC069267 as the lead case.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2019

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

THE LAW FIRM OF FOX AND FOX VS VANESSA LEE

On September 6, 2019, Plaintiff The Law Firm of Fox and Fox filed the instant action against Defendant Vanessa Lee and Does 1 to 10. The Complaint asserts causes of action for: Breach of Contract; Common Counts. On October 16, 2019, default was entered as to Defendant Vanessa Lee (hereinafter “Defendant”). On November 27, 2019, Does 1 to 10 were dismissed without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

SALLY VILLAREAL VS SHAO HUA YE M D

Plaintiff then filed this action on March 19, 2015 against Shao Hua Ye, M.D. and DOES 1-50, inclusive. As to DOES 1 to 30, Plaintiff alleges “That on or about January 24, 2014, plaintiff consulted defendants SHAO HUA YE, M.D. and DOES 1 through 30, regarding plaintiff’s medical condition and said defendants undertook to treat and care and do everything necessary and proper for the well-being and care and treatment of the plaintiff.” (Complaint, ¶ 6.)

  • Hearing

    May 10, 2018

MORRISSEY VS. PACIFICA AT NEWPORT PLAZA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION

Defendant Pacifica and DOES 1-50); (2) Breach of Fiduciary Duty (v. Defendant Pacifica and DOES 1-50); (3) Negligence (v. Defendant Pacifica and DOES 1-50); (4) Intentional Misrepresentation (v. Defendants Sellers and DOES 1-50); (5) Negligent Misrepresentation (v. Defendants Sellers and DOES 1-50); and (6) Negligence (v. Defendant McGrew and DOES 1-50).

  • Hearing

    Feb 13, 2020

MINT COLLECTION -410-418 JESSIE STREET CONDOMINIUM VS. FIFTH HISTORIC PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL

Notice Of Motion For Leave To File A Second Amended Complaint And Substitute Patrick Mcnerney As Does 1 And 101 And Name Veritas Investments Inc As Does 2 And 102 Set for hearing on Thursday, June 7, 2018, Line 12, PLAINTIFF MINT COLLECTION -410-418 JESSIE STREET CONDOMINIUM's Motion For Leave To File A Second Amended Complaint And Substitute Patrick Mcnerney As Does 1 And 101 And Name Veritas Investments Inc As Does 2 And 102.

  • Hearing

    Jun 07, 2018

RICHARD E THOMAS VS. CHET BENTLEY ET AL

See original complaint and FAC - both pleadings name Does 1-10, i.e. FAC does not name "Chet Bentley, William Bentley as Doe 1, and Does 2-10", it names "Chet Bentley, William Bentley and Does 1-10". = (501/REQ)

  • Hearing

    Dec 18, 2017

BRAND SURGICAL INSTITUTE MEDICAL CENTER INC VS VAHANOOSH TA

.; and Does 1 to 100. On August 16, 2018, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). The FAC asserts causes of action for: Breach of Oral Contract; Unjust Enrichment; Fraud; and Violation of Civil Code § 1709-1710. On October 3, 2019, default was entered as to Defendants Vahanoosh Taruise and Hi Medial Production Inc. (hereinafter “Defendants”). On November 6, 2019, Does 1 to 100 were dismissed with prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

DANIELLE LOWERY VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Public Entity; and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive Defendants. CASE NO: BC649840 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Dept. 98 1:30 p.m. May 18, 2017 On February 8, 2017, plaintiff Danielle Lowery ("Plaintiff”) filed this action against defendants City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 50. On March 22, 2017, defendant City of Los Angeles filed the instant Demurrer. On May 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint.

  • Hearing

    May 18, 2017

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.