Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

JOHN EROS VS CITY OF CUDAHY

CITY OF CUDAHY, ET AL., Defendant(s). Case No.: 19STCV05168 [TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Dept. 3 1:30 p.m. November 6, 2019 Plaintiff’s attorney of record, Stacey R. Cutting, seeks to be relieved as counsel, contending there has been a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship such that further representation is not possible. Counsel served Plaintiff at an address that has not been confirmed.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2019

MARK HARRISON VS. LIDIA RODRIGUEZ DEMAYORGA

City of Cudahy (1963) 60 Cal.2d 431, 434.) If placing a stop sign in an obscured position can be a dangerous condition (Dudum v.

  • Hearing

    Aug 28, 2014

DECOCK V. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH

City of Cudahy (1963) 60 Cal.2d 431, 434; Briggs v. State of California (1971) 14 Cal.App.3d 489, 497 [“the [city] having undertaken to sign the area was obligated to sign it properly and should have to answer for any inadequate or deceptive warning proximately contributing to the accident”].) Thus, city property where plantings obscure a stop sign has been held to constitute a dangerous, defective condition of public property (De La Rosa, at pp. 745-756; see also City of San Diego v.

  • Hearing

    Dec 20, 2018

HIRAM DAVID ESTRADA ET AL. VS COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN ETAL

City of Cudahy, 60 Cal.2d 431, 34 Cal.Rptr. 869, 386 P.2d 493.) Gardner v. City of San Jose (1967) 248 Cal.App.2d 798, 803 [57 Cal.Rptr. 176, 180]. The same questions that the Court considered in Gardner also apply in this matter; to wit: “the lack of crosswalk markings, better illumination and warning signs” are important factors in this case if the subject intersection is deemed to be in a dangerous condition.

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2018

ANGELICA CERVANTES VS CITY OF CUDAHY

Defendant’s unopposed Motion to Continue Trial, filed on 12/19/16 is GRANTED. Defendant has shown good cause for a continuance of trial. Cal Rules of Court Rule 3.1332; Declaration of John C. Barber. Accordingly, the court sets the following dates: FSC: September 8, 2017 @ 10:00 a.m. Trial: September 18, 2017 @ 8:30 a.m. OSC: March 16, ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2017

1

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.