Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

26-43 of 43 results

RUSHTON HALBERT VS PRN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL COVERAGE LLC

SUBJECT: Motion for Attorneys’ Fees Moving Party: Plaintiff Rushton Halbert Resp. Party: None Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs is GRANTED in part. The Court awards Plaintiff $48,208.55., which includes $40,000.00 for attorneys’ fees and $8,208.55 in costs. PRELIMINARY COMMENTS: On May 14, in response to Plaintiff...

  • Hearing

    Jul 25, 2019

JOSE CARLOS VS WHITTIER FERTILIZER COMPANY

Case Number: BC635706 JOSE CARLOS VS WHITTIER FERTILIZER COMPANY Filing Date: 09/29/2016 Case Type: Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) 10/11/2017 Motion for Summary Judgment NOTICE OF TENTATIVE RULING AND PROCEDURE FOR SUBMISSION WITHOUT HEARING The parties may submit to the tentative ruling without appearing for ...

  • Hearing

    Oct 11, 2017

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

RUSHTON HALBERT VS PRN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL COVERAGE LLC

SUBJECT: Motion for leave to amend Moving Party: Plaintiff Rushton Halbert Resp. Party: Defendant PRN Medical and Surgical Coverage, LLC. The Court DENIES the motion on the ground that it does not comply with CRC Rule 3.1324. PRELIMINARY NOTE The Court notes that plaintiff’s motion was not timely filed. Code of Civil Procedure section 1005(b) pro...

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2018

RUSHTON HALBERT VS PRN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL COVERAGE LLC

On November 2, 2017, the Court a bench trial commenced in this matter; the trial was continued for further testimony on December 19, 2017. The Court heard a total of 5.9 hours of testimony on those two days. Plaintiff has requested that the Court issue a statement of decision. Since the trial in this action was less than 8 hours, “the statement...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2019

RUSTY NICHOLS ET AL VS PACIFIC WINE DISTRIBUTORS INC

Nichols, et al. v. Pacific Wine Distributors, Inc. MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR FEES, COSTS, AND INCENTIVE PAYMENT TENTATIVE RULING: Grant motion for final approval; grant attorneys’ fees and costs as requested; grant class representative incentive of $5000 for each class representative. DISCUSSION...

  • Hearing

    Oct 18, 2016

ENRIQUE SANTANA VS ADIR INTERNATIONAL LLC ET AL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ENRIQUE SANTANA, Plaintiff, vs. ADIR INTERNATIONAL, LLC, and DOES 1-250, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO.: BC655851 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/ADJUDICATION 8:30 a.m. July 17, 2018 Dept. 56 ...

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2018

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

JOSE CARLOS VS WHITTIER FERTILIZER COMPANY

Case Number: BC635706 JOSE CARLOS VS WHITTIER FERTILIZER COMPANY Filing Date: 09/29/2016 Case Type: Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) Status: Pending Future Hearings 03/02/2017 Conference-Case Management OSC Re Entry of Default NOTICE OF TENTATIVE RULING AND PROCEDURE FOR SUBMISSION WITHOUT HEARING The parties ma...

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2017

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

HILDA ARANDA VS COUNTY OF L A DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES

James k. o’Donnell, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Glendale unified school district, et al. Defendants. Case No.: BC586063 Hearing Date: August 21, 2017 [TENTATIVE] order RE: Motion for to tax costs “Except as otherwise expressly provided by statute, a prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action o...

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2017

HILDA ARANDA VS COUNTY OF L A DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES

HILDA ARANDA, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPT. OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, et al. Defendants. Case No.: BC586063 Hearing Date: September 16, 2016 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION BACKGROUND This action arises out of Plaintiff Hilda Aranda’s (“Plaintiff”...

  • Hearing

    Sep 16, 2016

ALBERT VARGAS ET AL VS CITY OF LONG BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT

SUBJECT: Motion to tax costs Moving Party: Plaintiffs Albert Vargas and Pablo Orduno Resp. Party: Defendant City of Long Beach The Court GRANTS the motion to tax the expert witness fees of $14,477.07 and the costs for exhibits of $261.60, for a total of $14,738.67. The motion as to tax the remaining costs of $10,537.13 is DENIED. ...

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2016

MARGARITA WEIDMAN VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

TENTATIVE RULING Judge Dalila C. Lyons Department 20 ...

  • Hearing

    May 08, 2017

MARIA FIGUEROA ET AL VS S&S PETROLEUM INC

Figueroa, et al. v. S&S Petroleum, Inc. MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR FEES, COSTS, AND INCENTIVE PAYMENT TENTATIVE RULING Grant final approval, finding that the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Award $83,250 for fees and $8,500 for costs to class counsel, reduce enhancement to $5,000 fo...

  • Hearing

    Jan 10, 2017

STEVE VO VS MTL LOGISTICS LLC ET AL

Plaintiff/judgment creditor's motion to amend the judgment to add Mai Ly Dang as a defendant/judgment debtor is granted. The previously-submitted proposed order will be signed....

  • Hearing

    May 30, 2017

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

MARGARITA WEIDMAN VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

TENTATIVE RULING Judge Dalila C. Lyons Department 20 ...

  • Hearing

    May 08, 2017

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CECIL BROWN VS LITHIA MOTORS SUPPORT SERVICES INC ET AL

Defendants DCH Torrance Imports, Inc., Lithia Motors Support Services, Inc., and DCH Auto Group’s Motion to Dismiss the Action for Unjustified Failure to Prosecute is GRANTED. The action is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants move the court to dismiss the action pursuant to CCP §§ 583.410 and 583.420(a)(2) as well as CRC 3.1340. The ins...

  • Hearing

    May 17, 2018

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

CECIL BROWN VS LITHIA MOTORS SUPPORT SERVICES INC ET AL

The arbitration agreements clearly encompass Plaintiff’s claims and Plaintiff does not oppose arbitration. An arbitration agreement in the employment context will not be enforced as to wrongful termination, FEHA claims, and other claims tied to a fundamental public policy unless it meets the procedural safeguards of Armendariz v. Foundation Hea...

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2017

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

JAMAR HAYLES ET AL VS LONG BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET

Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Trial Date, filed on 4/21/17, is GRANTED. Plaintiff has shown good cause for a 3-month continuance of trial. Cal Rules of Court 3.1332(c); Declaration of Janine Shelby, Ph.D. Moving party is ordered to give notice. ...

  • Hearing

    Jun 09, 2017

JAMAR HAYLES ET AL VS LONG BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET

SUBJECT TO HEARING AND PERSONAL APPEARANCE THEREON: The parties having appeared (CRC 7.952(a)), and the Court having reviewed and heard the Petition to Approve Compromise of Pending Action of a Minor, Jamar Hayes, Age 8, the Court finds that the settlement is reasonable, and based thereon, approves and GRANTS the petition. CRC 7.950. Counse...

  • Hearing

    Oct 12, 2017

  « first    1 2

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.