Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

Personal appearance required for counsel for plaintiff to explain why claims of non-signing plaintiffs should not be dismissed and why counsel for plaintiff should not be sanctioned at least $150.00 per plaintiff for failure to file a timely Case Management Conference Statement for the 7/22/10 hearing and this hearing. Appearance of other couns...

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2010

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

No appearance is required under the following conditions: No party has filed any statement asserting that it is still an active party. Therefore, all remaining pleadings are dismissed as per the minute order of 9/15/11. The Court orders the entire action dismissed without prejudice. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter...

  • Hearing

    Sep 13, 2011

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal - Case Management Program continued to 09/15/2011 at 08:30 in this department. Any party asserting that it is still an active party to this case, as either a plaintiff, defendant, cross-complainant or cross-defendant shall file a case management stat...

  • Hearing

    Aug 16, 2011

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 04/22/2010 at 08:30 in this department. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 If any party wishes to request oral argu...

  • Hearing

    Feb 10, 2010

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

DATE OF HEARING: 10/29/2009 No appearance is required under the following conditions: Case Management Conference - Case Management Program continued to 02/18/2010 at 08:30 AM in this department. New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 If an...

  • Hearing

    Oct 23, 2009

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

No appearance is required under the following conditions: It appears that the case has settled. All remaining cross-complaints must be dismissed. The Court sets an Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for the following date and time: The Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal - Case Management Program is scheduled for 08/18/2011 at 08:30 AM in Depa...

  • Hearing

    Jun 14, 2011

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

Personal appearance required for counsel for plaintiff to explain why claims of non-signing plaintiffs should not be dismissed and why counsel for plaintiff should not be sanctioned at least $150.00 per plaintiff for failure to file a timely Case Management Conference Statement for the 7/22/10 hearing and this hearing. Appearance of other couns...

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2010

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

Appearance required by counsel for plaintiff. Telephone appearance allowed for all parties....

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2010

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

No appearance is required under the following conditions: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal - Case Management Program continued to 11/18/2010 at 08:30 in this department. An Attorney Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to hearing. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Ma...

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2010

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

Intervenor, Financial Pacific Insurance Co.'s (FPIC) motion to intervene is unopposed and is GRANTED. As insurer for cross-defendant Garnas & Rabe Construction, a suspended corporation without capacity to defend itself, FPIC has the right to file a complaint in intervention. FPIC shall file the complaint in intervention forthwith....

  • Hearing

    Sep 17, 2009

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

The previously imposed sanctions of $300.00 imposed against David S Grove on 11/18/2010 are not paid and must be paid immediately. The order to show cause will be dropped from calendar if counsel presents to the courtroom clerk a receipt showing payment no later than 8:45 a.m. on the day of hearing. An additional $150.00 sanction will be or...

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2011

CLAYTON BIAS.ET AL VS. MATTHEWS HOMES. ET AL

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter has been deemed settled. The Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal - Case Management Program is scheduled for 07/22/2010 at 08:30 AM in Department 35. An Attorney Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to hearing. If any party wishes...

  • Hearing

    Apr 14, 2010

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.'s (collectively, "Travelers") motion to bifurcate its complaint in intervention to be tried separately subsequent to trial between plaintiffs Anjula & Amrit Dutt, et al. ("Plaintiffs") and defendants KB Home Sacramento and KB Home North Bay (collec...

  • Hearing

    Jun 07, 2016

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.'s (collectively, "Travelers") motion to bifurcate its complaint in intervention to be tried separately subsequent to trial between plaintiffs Anjula & Amrit Dutt, et al. ("Plaintiffs") and defendants KB Home Sacramento and KB Home North Bay (collec...

  • Hearing

    Jun 07, 2016

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed interveners, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America's and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. (collectively, "Intervenors"), motion to intervene is GRANTED. Intervenors' pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of t...

  • Hearing

    Feb 09, 2016

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.'s (collectively, "Travelers") motion to bifurcate its complaint in intervention to be tried separately subsequent to trial between plaintiffs Anjula & Amrit Dutt, et al. ("Plaintiffs") and defendants KB Home Sacramento and KB Home North Bay (collec...

  • Hearing

    Jun 07, 2016

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

Below is the tentative ruling for the hearing on Wednesday, February 21, 2018. No appearance is required under the following conditions: The Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal-Complex is continued to March 1, 2018 at 11:30 a.m., at Plaintiff's request. Personal attendance required for parties who have not dismissed affirmative pleadings. ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2018

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed interveners, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America's and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. (collectively, "Intervenors"), motion to intervene is GRANTED. Intervenors' pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of t...

  • Hearing

    Feb 09, 2016

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

The following shall constitute the Court's tentative ruling for the Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal, which is set for hearing on Thursday, January 4, 2018 The Court is in possession of the Declaration of Anneke Blye submitted by plaintiffs' and filed with this court on December 27, 2017. The statement indicated that a global settlement ha...

  • Hearing

    Jan 02, 2018

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed interveners, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America's and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. (collectively, "Intervenors"), motion to intervene is GRANTED. Intervenors' pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of t...

  • Hearing

    Feb 09, 2016

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been received, proposed interveners, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America's and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. (collectively, "Intervenors"), motion to intervene is GRANTED. Intervenors' pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of t...

  • Hearing

    Feb 09, 2016

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

The following shall constitute the Court's tentative ruling for the Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal, which is set for hearing on Thursday, January 4, 2018 The Court is in possession of the Declaration of Anneke Blye submitted by plaintiffs' and filed with this court on December 27, 2017. The statement indicated that a global settlement ha...

  • Hearing

    Jan 02, 2018

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

Below is the tentative ruling for the hearing on April 29, 2016. The Status Conference-Complex set on April 29, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. is continued to May 9, 2016 at 9:00 a.m., in Department 35. NOTICE: To request oral argument on this matter, you must call the Court at (916) 874-7885 (Department 35) by 4:00 p.m., the court day before this h...

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2016

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.'s (collectively, "Travelers") motion to bifurcate its complaint in intervention to be tried separately subsequent to trial between plaintiffs Anjula & Amrit Dutt, et al. ("Plaintiffs") and defendants KB Home Sacramento and KB Home North Bay (collec...

  • Hearing

    Jun 07, 2016

ANJULA DUTT VS. KB HOME SACRAMENTO INC

Below is the tentative ruling for the hearing on April 29, 2016. The Status Conference-Complex set on April 29, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. is continued to May 9, 2016 at 9:00 a.m., in Department 35. NOTICE: To request oral argument on this matter, you must call the Court at (916) 874-7885 (Department 35) by 4:00 p.m., the court day before this h...

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2016

1 2     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.