Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

DIANA CHANG ET AL VS FRILLY INC ET AL

Li of Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo (“Counsel”) move to be relieved as counsel of record for Defendant Shangwei Ding (“Ding”). The Court finds that Counsel has complied with the relevant procedural requirements (CRC 3.1362) and has provided sufficient reason for withdrawal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion. Counsel is ordered to give notice of this ruling. DATED: December 3, 2019 ________________________________ Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

DIANA CHANG ET AL VS FRILLY INC ET AL

Li of Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo (“Counsel”) move to be relieved as counsel of record for Defendants Frilly, Inc. (“Frilly”) and Shangwei Ding (“Ding”). The Court notes that there is no notice of motion and motion directed to Ding; both motions appear to be directed to Frilly. Otherwise, the Court finds that Counsel has complied with the relevant procedural requirements (CRC 3.1362) and has provided sufficient reason for withdrawal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion as to Frilly.

  • Hearing

    Oct 23, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

PISCOTTY VS. CITY OF WESTMINSTER

Plaintiff shall pay sanctions in the amount of $325 to Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo within 30 days of notice of this ruling. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2018

PISCOTTY VS. CITY OF WESTMINSTER

Plaintiff shall pay sanctions in the amount of $325 to Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo within 30 days of notice of this ruling. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2018

ALVAREZ V. PARAMOUNT DEFENSES, INC.

Motion 1: Business Records Subpoenas: Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Dominic Alvarez’ Motion to quash deposition subpoenas for the production of business records of Apex Law, APC; Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo; Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Younger; Call & Jensen; Freeman Freeman & Smiley LLP; and Pfieffer FitzGibbon & Ziontz are each GRANTED. The Plaintiff's request sanctions in the amount of $1,500.00 is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2019

CITY OF SANBUENAVENTURA V. UNITED WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

Wheeler, Lana Milojevic, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo RULING: 1. The writ of mandate this Court issued in case numbers VENCI00401714 and 1414739 on September 6, 2013, is vacated. 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2019

LUCIA DE JESUS V. FROZSUN, INC.

Healy, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo Tentative Ruling: Subject to resolution of the issues stated herein, the motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement is granted. The parties are to be prepared to discuss at the hearing of this motion the notice issues discussed herein and scheduling issues for providing notice and final approval. Background: This is a motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement.

  • Hearing

    Apr 23, 2018

LUCIA DE JESUS V. FROZSUN, INC.

Healy, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo Tentative Ruling: As set forth herein, the motion of plaintiffs for final approval of class action settlement is granted. Background: This is a motion for final approval of a class action settlement.

  • Hearing

    Sep 17, 2018

LUCIA DE JESUS V. FROZSUN, INC.

Healy of Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo for defendant TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted as to Special Interrogatory Nos. 43 and 44, and is otherwise denied. No sanctions are awarded. Background: This is a wage and hour class action. Plaintiffs Lucia DeJesus and Maria Guillen are former employees of defendant Frozsun, Inc., a packager of frozen food products with facilities in Santa Barbara and Ventura counties.

  • Hearing

    Sep 11, 2017

TAMIKA SCHMIDT, ET AL. V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF VENTURA

Luna, Abraham Escareno, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo Rulings: 1. As for the Civil Law and Motion matter, for the reasons set forth herein, the motion of defendant General Services Agency, County of Ventura, for a determination of good faith settlement is granted. The Court finds that the settlement is in good faith within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure sections 877 and 877.6.

  • Hearing

    Nov 08, 2016

ATKINSON ADELSON LOYA RUUD & ROMO VS ALDRIDGE CONSTRUCTION

MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo OPPOSING PARTIES: Defendants California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, Aldridge Construction, Inc., and DPR Iron, LLC In this is an interpleader action, plaintiff alleges that it held about $950,000 in escrow in connection with a transaction among defendants and third parties, and that defendants made competing claims to the funds, including a tax lien.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2017

TAMIKA SCHMIDT, ET AL. V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNT OF VENTURA, ET AL.

Spinner, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo Ruling: For the reasons set forth herein, the motion of plaintiffs Tamika Schmidt and Danielle Penny to tax costs is granted. The Court disallows all costs against plaintiffs and makes no award of costs in favor of defendant Superior Court of California, County of Ventura.

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2018

HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA) LLC VS RODRIGUEZ, ROSA

Plaintiff Hapag-Lloyd (American), LLC’s Motions to Deem Request for Admissions as Admitted; to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Requests for Production of Documents; and to Request for Sanctions are GRANTED. The truth of the matters specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions to Defendant is hereby deem...

  • Hearing

    Apr 30, 2018

  • Judge

    Georgina Torres Rizk or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA) LLC VS RODRIGUEZ, ROSA

Plaintiff Hapag-Lloyd (American), LLC’s Motions to Deem Request for Admissions as Admitted; to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Requests for Production of Documents; and to Request for Sanctions are GRANTED. The truth of the matters specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions to Defendant is hereby deemed...

  • Hearing

    Apr 30, 2018

  • Judge

    Georgina Torres Rizk or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA) LLC VS RODRIGUEZ, ROSA

Plaintiff Hapag-Lloyd (America) LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Legal Standard A party seeking summary judgment has the burden of producing evidentiary facts sufficient to entitle him/her to judgment as a matter of law. CCP § 437c(c); Vesely v. Sager (1971) 5 Cal.3d 153. The moving party must make an affirmative showing th...

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2018

  • Judge

    Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

SOUTH PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT VS SAINT FRANCIS HIGH

South Pasadena Unified School District v. St. Francis High School, BS173520 Tentative decision on petition for writ of mandate: denied Petitioner South Pasadena Unified School District (“South Pasadena”) seeks a writ of mandate compelling Respondent St. Francis High School (“St. Francis”) to produce the full records of a former student (“St...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2019

RICHARD AMBRECHT VS QUINN COMPANY

Defendant Quinn Company’s Motion to Compel Binding Arbitration and for Automatic Stay of Superior Court Proceedings is GRANTED. The action is stayed pending the outcome of arbitration. The agreement at issue and that plaintiff signed provides the employee and Quinn Group, Inc. “shall be required to submit any unresolved ‘Covered Dispute’ to...

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2017

O.J. VS SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL

Tentative Ruling O.J., et al. v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District, Case No. SC128933 Hearing Date: March 6, 2020 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication Plaintiffs Jones are guardians ad litem for their minor child, plaintiff O.J., who has autism spectrum disorder and hyperkinetic syndrome. O.J.’s ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 06, 2020

FABIOLA FRAUSTO VS COSMETIX WEST

FRAUSTO v. COSMETIX WEST MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR FEES, COSTS, AND INCENTIVE PAYMENT TENTATIVE RULING Grant final approval, finding that the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Award $100,000 for fees and $16,508.54 for costs to class counsel, $3,500 for a service award to the cla...

  • Hearing

    Jun 21, 2017

JOSE DELGADO VS IRISH CONSTRUCTION

DELGADO V. IRISH CONSTRUCTION MOTION TO COMPEL INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION AND STAY ACTION, OR ALTERNATIVELY, TO DISMISS ACTION TENTATIVE RULING Grant motion to compel arbitration; defer for the arbitrator’s determination the issue of class arbitrability; stay the litigation of the case pending completion of the arbitration proceedings D...

  • Hearing

    Oct 25, 2016

JOSHUA CHO VS NEW YORK FILM ACADEMY LTD ET AL

CHO v. NEW YORK FILM ACADEMY, LTD. PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION TENTATIVE RULING Grant petition to compel arbitration; defer to the arbitrator the issue of class arbitrability; stay the litigation pending completion of the arbitration DISCUSSION I. Background This is a putative wage-and-hour class action. Plaintiff Jos...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2018

CLIFFORD MAJORS JR VS METAL TITE PRODUCTS ET AL

Background This employment action involves allegations of race discrimination and related claims. On August 1, 2016, plaintiff filed a complaint against his former employer. On December 8, 2016, the Court denied defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. The same day, plaintiff filed this motion for sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 03, 2017

CLIFFORD MAJORS JR VS METAL TITE PRODUCTS ET AL

Background This employment action involves allegations of race discrimination and related claims. On August 1, 2016, plaintiff filed a complaint against his former employer. On December 8, 2016, the Court denied defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. The same day, plaintiff filed this opposed motion for sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Pr...

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2017

CLIFFORD MAJORS JR VS METAL TITE PRODUCTS ET AL

Background This employment action involves allegations of race discrimination and related claims. On August 1, 2016, plaintiff filed a complaint against his former employer. On November 3, 2016, defendants filed this opposed motion to compel arbitration. The Court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers, and DENIES the motion as fol...

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2016

AMR STAFFING, INC. VS. COSCENTRIX, LLC

# 5. AMR Staffing, Inc. v. Coscentrix, LLC Case No.: TC028556 Matter on calendar for: Hearing on motion to be relieved as counsel Tentative ruling: I. Background In this breach of contract and common counts action, counsel for Plaintiff AMR Staffing, Inc. moves to be relieved from further representing AMR. Counsel filed and ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2018

  • Judge

    Brian S. Currey or Maurice A. Leiter or Salvatore Sirna

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1 2 3 4     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.