Get an email Alert with new cases related to

"ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC"

Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

SEARCH TIPS
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
county:name county:losangeles Filter by a specific county without spaces.
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "ammend" Either terms can appear in document
"" "motion for summary judgment" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
county:name county:losangeles Filter by a specific county without spaces.
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "ammend" Either terms can appear in document
"" "motion for summary judgment" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
Rulings Dockets Documents

1-25 of results

Sort By

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC VS. VIP COLLECTION INC

Good cause appearing and based on the stipulation of the parties, Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant's motion to consolidate Ascentium Capital, LLC v. VIP Collection, Inc. (34-2016-00204532); Ascentium Capital, LLC v. New Star Beauty Supply Dorr, Inc. (34-2016-00204555); and Ascentium Capital, LLC v. Star Beauty, Inc. (34-2016-00204556) for all purposes is granted. Ascentium Capital, LLC v. VIP Collection, Inc. (34-2016-00204532) shall be the lead case.

  • Hearing

    Jan 02, 2018

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Contract - Other

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC VS. VIP COLLECTION INC

Good cause appearing and based on the stipulation of the parties, Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant's motion to consolidate Ascentium Capital, LLC v. VIP Collection, Inc. (34-2016-00204532); Ascentium Capital, LLC v. New Star Beauty Supply Dorr, Inc. (34-2016-00204555); and Ascentium Capital, LLC v. Star Beauty, Inc. (34-2016-00204556) for all purposes is granted. Ascentium Capital, LLC v. VIP Collection, Inc. (34-2016-00204532) shall be the lead case.

  • Hearing

    Jan 02, 2018

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Contract - Other

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC V. INFINITY SPA ORLANDO, LLC

[Minute Order 11/2/18] Related matter: the court’s docket does not reflect that Ascentium Capital, LLC has filed an answer or otherwise responded to Ms. Orlando’s cross-complaint with this cross-complaint having been served back on 9-24-18 on plaintiff/cross-defendant Ascentium Capital, LLC Future Hearings: Motion to Quash Service: 1/24/19 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice (2): 1/24/19 MSC: 5/10/19 Jury Trial: 6/10/19

  • Hearing

    Jan 10, 2019

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL, LLC VS LAWTON W. TANG, M.D. INC, ET AL.

ascentium Capital, llc, Plaintiff, vs. lawton w. tang, m.d. inc., et al., Defendants. Case No.: 20STCV30469 Hearing Date: February 23, 2021 Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m. ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Plaintiff Ascentium Capital, LLC (“Plaintiff”) requests entry of default judgment against Defendants Lawton W. Tang, M.D. Inc., Lawton W. Tang, M.D., aka Lawton W. Tang aka Lawton Wai-Choy Tang, and Angel Plastic Surgery, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Feb 23, 2021

FEMTOMETRIX, INC. V. CULVER CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Defendant’s (Ascentium Capital, LLC) Motion to Birfurcate and Try Separately Issues of Lability and Damages (Motion), filed on 5-28-19, is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2019

ASCENTIUM VS. OMANI

HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES FILED BY ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC * TENTATIVE RULING: * Vacated at the request of the moving party.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC VS SEREC OF CALIFORNIA

Ascentium Capital LLC v. Serec of California (KC069054) Plaintiff’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Respondent: NO OPPOSITION TENTATIVE RULING Plaintiff’s application for default judgment is GRANTED. Judgment is signed.

  • Hearing

    Jul 03, 2017

ASCENTIUM VS. SHORTZ

. / FILED BY ASCENTIUM CAPITAL, LLC * TENTATIVE RULING: * Continued by the Court to 9 a.m. October 28, 2016. See Court’s memo dated September 28, 2016.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2016

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC VS. STAR BEAUTY INC

The parties are directed to the Court's concurrent ruling in Ascentium Capital, LLC v. VIP Collection, Inc., Case No. 34-2016-00204532. This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing. In the event that either party requests a hearing the matter will be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 47. Any party requesting an oral argument must contact the clerk at (916) 874-5487 and opposing counsel or parties in pro per by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Jan 02, 2018

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Contract - Other

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

ASCENTIUM VS. SHORTZ

Judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff Ascentium Capital, LLC and against the defendants Roger W. Shortz, a professional corporation, and Roger W. Shortz, M.D. in the amount of $237,760.82. The Court is granting judgment for the full amount of the monetary debt.

  • Hearing

    Sep 08, 2017

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC VS. VIP COLLECTION INC

The parties are directed to the Court's concurrent ruling in Ascentium Capital, LLC v. VIP Collection, Inc., Case No. 34-2016-00204532. This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing. In the event that either party requests a hearing the matter will be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 47. Any party requesting an oral argument must contact the clerk at (916) 874-5487 and opposing counsel or parties in pro per by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Jan 02, 2018

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Contract - Other

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC VS. NEW STAR BEAUTY SUPPLY DORR INC

The parties are directed to the Court's concurrent ruling in Ascentium Capital, LLC v. VIP Collection, Inc., Case No. 34-2016-00204532. This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing. In the event that either party requests a hearing the matter will be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 47. Any party requesting an oral argument must contact the clerk at (916) 874-5487 and opposing counsel or parties in pro per by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Jan 02, 2018

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Contract - Other

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC VS INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ET AL.

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles DEPARTMENT 71 TENTATIVE RULING ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC, vs. INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et al. Case No.: 20STCV08887 Hearing Date: November 3, 2020 Cross-Defendant Ascentium Capital LLC’s unopposed demurrer to the cross-complaint of Cross-Complainant Kamran Broukhim is sustained without leave to amend.

  • Hearing

    Nov 03, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC VS. VIP COLLECTION INC

The parties are directed to the Court's concurrent ruling in Ascentium Capital, LLC v. VIP Collection, Inc., Case No. 34-2016-00204532. This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing. In the event that either party requests a hearing the matter will be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 47. Any party requesting an oral argument must contact the clerk at (916) 874-5487 and opposing counsel or parties in pro per by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Jan 02, 2018

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Contract - Other

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

ASCENTIUM VS. SHORTZ

HEARING ON DEMURRER TO SECOND AMENDED ANSWER FILED BY ASCENTIUM CAPITAL, LLC * TENTATIVE RULING: * Plaintiff Ascentium Capital, LLC’s demurrer to Defendants Roger Shortz, MD, a professional corporation, and Roger Shortz’s second amended verified answer is overruled. The Court previously sustained Plaintiff’s demurrer to Defendants’ amended answer because the affirmative defenses were not sufficiently supported by factual allegations. In fact, the amended answer appeared to have almost no facts alleged.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2016

FEMTOMETRIX, INC., V. CULVER CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

The demurrer brought by Ascentium Capital, LLC set for 4-11-17 is off calendar based on the First Amended Complaint filed on 3-23-17 by Plaintiff. JKC3H8 v. Colton (2013) 221 Cal.App.4th 468, 477 stated, “[A]n amendatory pleading supersedes the original one, which ceases to perform any function as a pleading. The amended complaint furnishes the sole basis for the cause of action, and the original complaint ceases to have any effect either as a pleading or as a basis for judgment.

  • Hearing

    Apr 11, 2017

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS EDGAR MNOYAN, ET AL.

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT Plaintiff Ascentium Capital LLC filed a complaint on March 21, 2019 against Defendants Diamond Lane Music Group Inc. and Edgar Mnoyan for (1) breach of equipment finance agreement; (2) breach of guaranty; and (3) claim and delivery. This case arises out of a loan made by Plaintiff to Defendant Diamond Lane Music Group. (Plaintiff’s Summary of the Case p. 1:28.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 25, 2019

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC VS. ARDEN

Plaintiff Ascentium Capital LLC moves for an Order that Requests for Admissions to Defendant Matthew Arden be Deemed Admitted against Defendants Matthew Arden, Michael Diamond and Anthony Basilio. CCP §2033.280(c). Defendants Arden and Basilio have made no showing that they have served any responses. Further, Defendants Arden and Basilio have not filed any Opposition or any other responsive pleading. Defendant Diamond did file a response but served those responses late.

  • Hearing

    Sep 19, 2019

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL, LLC VS. REPRIME LLC

Plaintiff Ascentium Capital, LLC demurs to affirmative defense numbers 2-24 contained in Defendants Reprime LLC, dba Remax Prime LLC, DYC Group LLC and Gideon Gratsiani (collectively, “Defendants”) First Amended Verified Answer. Plaintiff’s demurrer is based upon the grounds that affirmative defense numbers 2-24 fail to state facts sufficient to constitute a defense and are uncertain, ambiguous and unintelligible. CCP §430.20(a) and (b), respectively.

  • Hearing

    Jan 24, 2019

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS EDGAR MNOYAN, ET AL.

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT Plaintiff Ascentium Capital LLC filed a complaint on March 21, 2019 against Defendants Diamond Lane Music Group Inc. and Edgar Mnoyan for (1) breach of equipment finance agreement; (2) breach of guaranty; and (3) claim and delivery. This case arises out of a loan made by Plaintiff to Defendant Diamond Lane Music Group. (Plaintiff’s Summary of the Case p. 1:28.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 25, 2019

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC VS. PRIME MEDICAL CARE P.C.

Motion for Attorneys’ Fees Moving Party: Plaintiff Ascentium Capital LLC Responding Party: Defendants Prime Medical Care, P.C. and Dr. Lalarukh Malik Ruling: Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees is granted. Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ fees as costs in the total amount of $19,372.00. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5; Anderson Decl., Exs. A and J.) The award does not include fees that are unreasonable or unnecessary to the conduct of the litigation.

  • Hearing

    Jun 24, 2019

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL, LLC VS ARM TRANS EXPRESS INC., ET AL.

Date: 07/12/19 Case: Ascentium Capital, LLC v. Arm Trans Express Inc., et al. (19 GDCV00467) TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff’s Demurrer on the ground the unverified answer is insufficient because the complaint is verified does not appear to be a valid ground for demurrer to an answer. (See CCP § 430.20 [listing grounds for demurrer to an answer].)

  • Hearing

    Jul 12, 2019

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

FEMTOMETRIX, INC. V. CULVER CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Defendant (Ascentium Capital, LLC) is to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jun 13, 2017

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS HAMID MIRSHOJAE, ET AL.

BACKGROUND Ascentium Capital, LLC (Ascentium) filed a complaint against Woodland Hills Medical Clinic, Hamid Mirshojae (collectively Woodland Hills), and Does 1 through 10, alleging claims for: (1) breach of an equipment finance agreement; (2) breach of guaranty; and (3) for claim and delivery.

  • Hearing

    Nov 13, 2020

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC V. VIRK

Motion: By Plaintiff Ascentium Capital, LLC for a Writ of Possession. Tentative Ruling: To take the matter off calendar. Explanation: Plaintiff has filed an application for write of possession. As of June 22, 2018, no proof of service for either the initial complaint, the notice of or application for the writ of possession, or any supporting papers has been filed with the Court. Therefore, the matter will be taken off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2018

1 2 3 4 5     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.