Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

26-50 of 716 results

ROBERT ERINGER ET AL VS MEGA GROUP PRIVATE ETC ET AL

Plaintiffs Robert Eringer and Elizabeth Eringer are married and are the parents of two adult children, plaintiffs Claire Boyle and Olivia Eringer. Claire Boyle and plaintiff Marcus Boyle are married and are the parents of plaintiff Rylan Boyle, a minor. Olivia Eringer and plaintiff Darren Wass are the parents of plaintiff Oliver Wass, also a minor. Plaintiffs allege that the subject website is used to spread false and defamatory statements about them.

  • Hearing

    May 08, 2013

PLAZA FREEWAY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP VS. SAGHAFI

Similarly, Recital D on p. 1 of the Settlement Agreement provides: “The Settling Parties agree and stipulate that the elevations pertaining to the Property set forth in the report of Boyle Engineering Corporation are attached as Exhibit 1”, but the Settlement Agreement attached as Exhibit 1 to the Brutocao Declaration does not include anything marked as either Exhibit 1 or as being from Boyle Engineering.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

SEAN FORD VS MICHAEL BOYLE, ET AL.,

Earlier in the SAC, plaintiff refers to an agreement between defendant Boyle and plaintiff under which “Plaintiff contribute[d] his money, ideas and labor toward a number of technology businesses” and that “[t]he agreement also stated Plaintiff . . . will hold a 30% share in the entities” (SAC at ¶¶ 18, 20). Per the allegations, Grabher did not invest in the entities until after this agreement was entered into (SAC At ¶21).

  • Hearing

    Feb 14, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

LOGUS ADAMS ET AL VS. A.W.CHESTERTON COMPANY ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SET FOR HEARING ON APRIL 10, 2006 DEFENDANT GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED, MOTION IS PROCEDULLARY INFIRM PER CCP 437C AND BOYLE V. CERTAINTEED. =(302/PA/PB)

  • Hearing

    Apr 10, 2006

PLAZA FREEWAY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP VS. SAGHAFI

Similarly, Recital D on p. 1 of the Settlement Agreement provides: “The Settling Parties agree and stipulate that the elevations pertaining to the Property set forth in the report of Boyle Engineering Corporation are attached as Exhibit 1”, but the Settlement Agreement attached as Exhibit 1 to the Brutocao Declaration does not include anything marked as either Exhibit 1 or as being from Boyle Engineering.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

CHARLES EDWARD BOYLE ET AL VS. AC AND S, INC. ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Appoint Frances Boyle As Successor-In-Interest To, And Substitute Successor-In-Interest For, Deceased Plaintiff GRANT, NO OPPOSITION FILED.

  • Hearing

    Jun 17, 2002

IN THE MATTER OF MIRIAM E. SCHWAB

Boyle, with no reallocation or infusion into the law firm general fund. gmr

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2018

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

CHRISTIAN BOYLE VS ADULT STORE ET AL

Background: On January 7, 2013, plaintiff Christian Boyle filed this complaint asserting unspecified claims for breach of contract and “Section 315 Violation.” (Complaint, ¶ 8.) The Adult Store is the fictitious business name of S.B. Books, Inc. (Green decl., ¶ 2.) S.B. Books, Inc., is a California corporation, whose president and sole officer is Donovan Green. (Green decl., ¶ 1.) Green never received personal service of the summons and complaint. (Green decl., ¶ 4.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2013

IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN CHARLES ARMSTRONG

Approve $5000 payment to CPA Boyle in final payment of estate accounting services; in addition to the $10,000 previously paid. Approve $3000 payment to executor's husband (SV Construction) as and for final payment of construction services negotiated with his wife as executor. Authorize $5000 reserve. The equal distribution of the "balance" of estate assets among decedent's three children is consistent with the laws of intestate succession. gmr

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2012

CHARLES LEE VS. MOROSO CONSTRUCTION INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL

Ntc Of Motion To Compel Production Of Documents From Moroso Construction Inc Set for hearing on Friday, January 18, 2013, Line 11, PLAINTIFF CHARLES LEE, ALEXANDRA BOYLE Ntc Of Motion To Compel Production Of Documents From Moroso Construction Inc Judge Miller has recused herself. Per the Presiding Judge, this motion is assigned to Judge McBride in Department 220. The parties are to contact the clerk in Department 220 at (415) 551-3771 to schedule a hearing on the motion. =(302/MJM)

  • Hearing

    Jan 18, 2013

IN THE MATTER OF MIRIAM E. SCHWAB

Boyle, with no reallocation or infusion into the law firm general fund. gmr

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2018

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF MIRIAM E. SCHWAB

Boyle, with no reallocation or infusion into the law firm general fund. gmr

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2018

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

DOUCET VS INTERNATIONAL HAIR INSTITUTE LLC [E-FILE]

Boyle has met the eligibility requirements outlined in California Rules of Court, rule 9.40 for out of state counsel to be admitted pro hac vice. It should be noted that Government Code section 70617 subd. (e)(2) requires a $500 annual renewal fee be paid for each year that the attorney maintains pro hac vice status in the case. IT IS SO ORDERED.

  • Hearing

    Jul 12, 2018

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

LAVERNE J. ABMA VS. THORPE INSULATION COMPANY AND ALTERNATE ENTITIES

Boyle Set For Hearing On Friday, January 5, 2007, Line 6. SPECIALLY APPEARING DEFENDANT TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY Motion To Quash Service Of Summons And First Amended And Consolidated Complaint IS GRANTED. NO OPPOSITION FILED. =(302/REQ)

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2007

VINCENT WALTENBERGER, ET VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ET AL

BOYLE & CO. (1995) 40 CAL.APP.4TH 700, 717, THAT JURISDICTION IS DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF EXPOSURE, NOT WHEN THE CAUSE OF ACTION ACCRUED. AT THAT TIME, PLAINTIFF HAS PRESENTED FACTS THAT ESTABLISH A BASIS TO ASSERT GENERAL JURISDICTION OVER DEFENDANT. AS TO SPECIAL JURISDICTION, IT APPEARS THAT PLAINTIFF'S EXPOSURE OCCURRED IN WISCONSIN AND THAT THERE IS NOT A BASIS TO ASSERT SPECIAL JURISDICTION OVER DEFENDANT. SEE CASSIER MINING CORP. V. SUPERIOR COURT (1998) 66 CAL.APP.4TH 550, 555. =(302/PJM/VC)

  • Hearing

    Dec 12, 2008

DAVID BOYLE VS LAURA SANDUSKY ET AL

Declaration of David Boyle, ¶ 5-6, 8. Accordingly, all discovery, motion, and expert cut-off dates are based on the new trial date, presently set for 11/6/19. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    May 10, 2019

MANISHKUMAR ANKOLA V. PRIYANKA ANKOLA

Northrop Grumman Corp. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 995, 999; Shea Homes Limited Partnership v. County of Alameda (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 1246, 1254 (Shea).) A defendant can move for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that the complaint does not state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(1)(B)(ii).) “The grounds for the motion must appear on the face of the complaint, and in any matters subject to judicial notice. [Citation.]

  • Hearing

    Apr 18, 2019

CHARLES LEE VS. MOROSO CONSTRUCTION INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL

Ntc Of Mtn And Mtn For Leave To File Second Amended Complaint Matter on Calendar for Thursday, September 5, 2013, Line 5, PLAINTIFFS ALEXANDRA BOYLE, CHARLES LEE'S Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To File Second Amended Complaint Granted. Motion is unopposed. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to [email protected] with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

  • Hearing

    Sep 05, 2013

KATHLEEN CHADD VS SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO ET AL

June 29, 2017 Plaintiff’s counsel of record, Tredway, Lumsdaine & Boyle LLP, seeks to be relieved, contending that there has been an irreparable breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. Counsel declares that the moving papers have been served at the client’s last known address, which was confirmed by telephone. All other parties who have appeared have also been served with the moving papers. The Court notes that trial is set for September 5, 2017.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

ROBERT ERINGER ET AL VS MEGA GROUP PRIVATE ETC ET AL

BACKGROUND: The plaintiffs in this action are Robert Eringer, Elizabeth Eringer, Marcus Boyle, Claire Boyle, Rylan Boyle (minor), Darren Wass, Olivia Eringer, and Oliver Wass (minor). On February 6, 2013, plaintiffs filed suit against defendants Mega Group Private Investigations, Inc., Mega Group Online, Inc., Zeev Haskal, and Sarah Byrnes after statements and photographs allegedly obtained by defendants were published on a website.

  • Hearing

    May 29, 2013

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA VS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

Seely (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 627, 636-637; Boyle v. CertainTeed Corp. (2006) 137 Cal.App.4th 645, 654-655; Urshan v. Musicians' Credit Union (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 758, 763-766.) (2) By filing a notice of joinder only, with no separate statement, and seeking merely to join in Plaintiffs Frye and Morris's motion for summary adjudication, Plaintiffs did not specifically request relief on their own behalf. (See Decker v. U.D. Registry, Inc. (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 1382, 1391; Village Nurseries v.

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2011

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Breach

PAC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC VS. HERMAN

Boyle (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 1020, 1034.) General Allegations of FAC Generally, the FAC states the following facts. In 2005, PAC entered into a series of contracts with Santa Rosa Highlands (Santa Rosa) for improvement of several lots. In turn, PAC entered into several written contracts to provide materials and construction services to Pinnacle at each lot. An exemplar of those contracts is attached to the FAC as Exhibit "A."

  • Hearing

    Jun 05, 2012

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA VS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

Seely (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 627, 636-637; Boyle v. CertainTeed Corp. (2006) 137 Cal.App.4th 645, 654-655; Urshan v. Musicians' Credit Union (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 758, 763-766.) (2) By filing a notice of joinder only, with no separate statement, and seeking merely to join in Plaintiffs Frye and Morris's motion for summary adjudication, Plaintiffs did not specifically request relief on their own behalf. (See Decker v. U.D. Registry, Inc. (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 1382, 1391; Village Nurseries v.

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2011

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Breach

STORIX INC VS ANTHONY JOHNSON

Boyle (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 1020, 1037; Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. Glen (1966) 64 Cal.2d 327, 347 disapproved of by Frantz v. Johnson (2000) 116 Nev. 455) This court previously found the claim for breach of fiduciary duty was sufficient for purposes of pleading. The Motion to Strike is granted as the claims for punitive damages. There still are insufficient specific facts to support a claim for punitive damages.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2016

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

DANIEL WOODY ET AL VS. CADELINIA & LEUNG, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL

Boyle (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 1020, discussing Bennett v. Suncloud (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 91. Additionally, September 5, 2012 order did not address the issue of reliance as Defendant's demurrer to cause of action for Intentional Misrepresentation did not raise this argument. (See Points and Authorities in Support of Demurrer to First Amended Complaint 3:25-5:8). = (501/REQ)

  • Hearing

    Oct 09, 2013

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 29     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.