Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

226-250 of 323 results

DARLENE SALAS VS CLARA GARCIA LUADROS ET AL

The Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds Plaintiff acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(c), 2031.300(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here.

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

JEFFREY HOOPES ET AL VS JASSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC ET AL

The Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds that the one subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290(c), 2031.300(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here. Defendants request monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,337.50, contending that 4.3 hours were spent preparing this Motion and 3 hours will be spent appearing at the hearing, at a rate of $175.00 per hour.

  • Hearing

    May 08, 2017

YESENIA B GARRIDO ET AL VS GRANT JAMES VALENTINE ET AL

The Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds that the one subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., §§ 2031.300(c), 2030.290(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here.

  • Hearing

    Jun 02, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

KEVIN LEE VS SHAFQUAT MALIK ET AL

The Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds Plaintiff acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., §§ 2030.290(c), 2031.300(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here.

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

JAVIER SOLIS ET AL VS EMILIO PEREZ VERDIN ET AL

The Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds Plaintiffs acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., §§ 2030.290(c), 2031.300(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here. Moving Defendant seeks monetary sanctions in the amount of $544.00 for two of its Motions, contending that they required two hours to prepare and will require two hours to appear at the hearing, at a rate of $121.00 per hour.

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

DAVID GEOOLLA VS TIMOTHY JACKSON ET AL

The Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds Plaintiff acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., §§ 2030.290(c), 2031.300(c). The Court notes that Timothy served timely, though unverified, substantive responses to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. The Court finds that the imposition of monetary sanctions under these circumstances would be unjust and therefore declines to impose monetary sanctions.

  • Hearing

    Dec 27, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

ROLANDO MARTINEZ VS CHRISTIAN MARTINEZ ET AL

The Court must impose monetary sanctions for motions to compel discovery responses, unless it finds that the one subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. (Id., §§ 2030.290(c), 2031.300(c).) Plaintiff has failed to respond to Moving Defendant’s discovery requests. Accordingly, Moving Defendant’s unopposed Motions are GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Sep 08, 2017

GINGER ORTIZ-STONE VS MARIANA GROSSO GONZALEZ ET AL

As to Defendants’ other Motions, the Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds Plaintiff acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., § 2030.290(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here. Defendants request $510.00 in monetary sanctions for each of their Motions, contending that each required one hour to prepare and will require two hours to appear at the hearing, at a rate of $150.00 per hour.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

PARKER WARAFTIG ET AL VS STARBUCKS CORPORATION

The Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds that the one subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., § 2025.450(g)(1). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here.

  • Hearing

    Aug 30, 2017

JOSE MAURICIO MEJIA ET AL VS IK SEON CHOI ET AL

Monetary Sanctions In connection with failure to respond to interrogatories “[t]he court shall impose a monetary sanction . . . against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a response to interrogatories, unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.290(c).)

  • Hearing

    Aug 01, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

KOREA TRADE INSURANCE CORPORATION, WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS K-SURE, A KOREA CORPORATION VS DID FABRIC, INC.

Under California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 2023.030(a) “[t]he court may impose a monetary sanction ordering that one engaging in the misuse of the discovery process, or any attorney advising that conduct, or both pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by anyone as a result of that conduct.” “The court must . . . impose monetary sanctions upon the party and/or the attorney for the failure to serve a timely response to the RFAs.” (St. Mary v.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2019

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

TIFFANY WELLER VS WHOLE FOODS MARKET BRAND 365 LLC ET AL

As to Moving Defendant’s other Motions, the Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds that the one subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., § 2030.290(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here.

  • Hearing

    Aug 08, 2017

GLINDIA BARLEY VS EXTENDED STAY AMERICA INC.,

Where any party or attorney attended a deposition in the expectation that the deponent’s testimony would be taken, the court shall impose a monetary sanction against the non-appearing deponent. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2025.450, subd. (g)(2).) The Court awards sanctions in the amount of $726.24 for one hour preparing this unopposed motion and one hour attending the hearing at counsel’s rate of $250.00 per hour, plus costs incurred for Mr. Brown’s nonappearance. The Motion to Compel Mr.

  • Hearing

    Nov 29, 2017

SKYLER WELLS VS ALAN ROSENBACH

As to Defendant’s second Motion, the Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds Plaintiff acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., § 2030.290(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here. Defendant requests $757.50 in monetary sanctions for one of his Motions, contending that it required 1.5 hours to prepare and will require 3 hours to appear at the hearing, at a rate of $155.00 per hour.

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2017

DEANAR YOUNG VS PARAGON CHIROPRACTIC ET AL

As to Moving Defendant’s other Motions, the Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds that the one subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., §§ 2031.300(c), 2030.290(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here. Moving Defendant requests a total of $2,490.00, contending that these Motions required a total of thirteen hours to prepare, at a rate of $150.00 per hour.

  • Hearing

    Jun 02, 2017

TIERRA LAROSE VS MICHAELS STORES INC

As to Defendant’s other two Motions, the Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds Plaintiff acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(c), 2031.300(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here.

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2017

TIMOTHY MITCHELL VS JORGE HERNANDEZ ET AL

The Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds Plaintiff acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., §§ 2030.290(c), 2031.300(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here. Defendants seek monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,110.00 for each of their four Motions, contending that each took one hour to prepare and will require two hours to appear at the hearing, at a rate of $350.00 per hour.

  • Hearing

    Dec 16, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

JOSE CASTILLO VS BELLE LAWS ET AL

Further, the Court must impose monetary sanctions when granting a motion to compel further responses, unless it finds that the one subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. (Code of Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.300, subd. (d), 2031.310, subd. (h).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 18, 2017

JOHN KALLIMANIS VS MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF CALIFORNIA INC

As to the remaining Motions, the Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds that the one subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., §§ 2031.300(c), 2030.290(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here.

  • Hearing

    Aug 15, 2017

T P VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL

As to LAUSD’s other Motions, the Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds Plaintiff acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., § 2030.290(c), 2031.300(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here.

  • Hearing

    Sep 19, 2016

CHRISTOPHER SUNDBERG VS HAKAN ERKAN

The Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds that Plaintiff acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., §§ 2030.290(c), 2031.300(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here.

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

JOHN CHRISTOPHER CALLANAN VS LESLIE JOANN ABNEY

Where a party fails to provide a timely response to requests for admission, it is mandatory that the court impose a monetary sanction on the party or attorney, or both, whose failure to serve a timely response necessitated the motion. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (c).) However, the Court concludes that one hour preparing this unopposed motion and one hour attending the hearing at counsel’s rate of $350.00 per hour, plus the $60.00 filing fee, is sufficient to compensation Plaintiff’s counsel.

  • Hearing

    Nov 01, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

EUNICE HORTON VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES

As to Plaintiff’s other Motion, the Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds that the one subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., § 2030.290(c). Plaintiff seeks monetary sanctions in the amount of $4,560.00 for each Motion, contending that each required one half hour to prepare and will require four hours to prepare a reply and appear at the hearing, at a rate of $1,000.00 per hour.

  • Hearing

    Apr 06, 2017

JUDITH QUINTANA VS TONY MAURICE DAVIS ET AL

As to the remaining Motions, the Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds that the one subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., §§ 2031.300(c), 2030.290(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here. Moving Defendant requests a total of $1,105.00 in monetary sanctions, contending that over three hours were spent preparing these Motions, at a rate of $325.00 per hour.

  • Hearing

    Aug 23, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

STACY MANNING VS FRANK A VEDRES ET AL

As to Moving Defendant’s other Motions, the Court must impose monetary sanctions, unless it finds that the one subject to sanctions acted with substantial justification or that circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. Id., §§ 2031.300(c), 2030.290(c). The Court finds sanctions to be appropriate here.

  • Hearing

    Apr 26, 2017

  « first    1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.