Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party

1-25 of 322 results

RAFIK KAZARYAN VS CALSTAR MOTORS INC

“A request for a sanction shall, in the notice of motion, identify every person, party, and attorney against whom the sanction is sought, and specify the type of sanction sought. The notice of motion shall be supported by a memorandum of points and authorities, and accompanied by a declaration setting forth facts supporting the amount of any monetary sanction sought.” (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2023.040.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 31, 2017

UMUTKER BURGEEVA VS IGOR MELNIKOV ET AL

A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order dismissing part or all of the action. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2023.030, subd. (d)(3).) If a party deponent fails to obey an order compelling attendance and testimony at deposition, “the court may make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction . . .” (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2025.450, subd. (h).)

  • Hearing

    Nov 22, 2017

ANATOLY CHIZMAR VS WILLIE HIGGINS III ET AL

To date, Plaintiff has failed to serve discovery responses or pay the monetary sanction. Defendant now seeks an order imposing terminating sanctions against Plaintiff. Where a party fails to obey an order compelling answers to discovery, “the court may make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction.” (Code of Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subd. (c), 2023.010, subd. (c); R.S. Creative, Inc. v.

  • Hearing

    Feb 22, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

GOFF, TIANA VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN

The Court may impose a terminating sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., § 2023.030(d). Misuse of the discovery process includes failure to respond to an authorized method of discovery or disobeying a court order to provide discovery. Id., §§ 2023.010(d), (g). A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order dismissing part or all of the action. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(3).

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

CLAUDIO ZAMPOLLI VS TRISTRAM THOMAS BUCKLEY

Defendant’s motion is made on the grounds that: (1) a sanction award of $5,000.00 or less is not a final order and as such the right to appeal such a sanction order only arises after there has been a final judgment entered in the underlying action; and (2) Judge Scheper’s sanction order was imposed without compliance with the safe harbor provision as held mandatory by the Second District Court of Appeal. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2019

DANELLE COLLINS VS CF UNITED LLC

Where a party fails to obey an order compelling answers to discovery, “the court may make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction.” (Code of Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subd. (c), 2023.010, subd. (c); R.S. Creative, Inc. v. Creative Cotton, Ltd. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 486, 495.) The Court may impose a terminating sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. (Code of Civ.

  • Hearing

    Dec 11, 2017

KARLA PARRA VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

If a party deponent fails to obey an order compelling attendance and testimony at deposition, “the court may make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction . . .” (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2025.450, subd. (h).)

  • Hearing

    Dec 13, 2017

OSWALDO CISNEROS ET AL VS AHMC HEALTHCARE INC

The Court may impose a terminating sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., § 2023.030(d). Misuse of the discovery process includes failure to respond to an authorized method of discovery or disobeying a court order to provide discovery. Id., §§ 2023.010(d), (g). A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order dismissing part or all of the action. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(3).

  • Hearing

    Feb 07, 2017

JOHN THIBODEAU VS INTERNATIONAL COFFEE & TEA LLC

A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order striking out the pleadings in whole or in part, staying further proceedings by that party until an order for discovery is obeyed, dismissing part or all of the action, or rendering a judgment by default. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(1)-(4). “‘Only two facts are absolutely prerequisite to imposition of the sanction: (1) there must be a failure to comply … and (2) the failure must be willful.’” Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2016

T P VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL

The Court may impose a terminating sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., § 2023.030(d). Misuse of the discovery process includes failure to respond to an authorized method of discovery or disobeying a court order to provide discovery. Id., §§ 2023.010(d), (g). A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order dismissing part or all of the action. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(3).

  • Hearing

    Feb 10, 2017

ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY VS SERGIO LERIN

The Court may impose a terminating sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 2023.030(d).) Misuse of the discovery process includes failure to respond to an authorized method of discovery or disobeying a court order to provide discovery. (Id., § 2023.010(d), (g).) A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order dismissing part or all of the action. (Id., § 2023.030(d)(3).)

  • Hearing

    Sep 14, 2017

ALIYA ISSABEKOVA VS ANDRII BONDAREVSKYI

Where a party fails to obey an order compelling answers to discovery, “the court may make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction.” (Code of Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subd. (c), 2023.010, subd. (c); R.S. Creative, Inc. v. Creative Cotton, Ltd. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 486, 495.) The Court may impose a terminating sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. (Code of Civ.

  • Hearing

    Feb 08, 2018

JAVIER SOLIS ET AL VS EMILIO PEREZ VERDIN ET AL

The Court may impose a terminating sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., § 2023.030(d). Misuse of the discovery process includes failure to respond to an authorized method of discovery or disobeying a court order to provide discovery. Id., §§ 2023.010(d), (g). A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order dismissing part or all of the action. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(3).

  • Hearing

    Aug 04, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

PHYLLIS BARNETT VS WESTFIELD GROUP

The Court may impose a terminating sanction, issue sanction, or evidence sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., §§ 2023.030(d), 2023.030(b), 2023.030(c). Misuse of the discovery process includes failure to respond to an authorized method of discovery or making an evasive response to discovery. Id., §§ 2023.010(d), (e).

  • Hearing

    Dec 19, 2016

JUAN C AGUILAR VS ROC DESIGN INC ET AL

The Court may impose a terminating sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., § 2023.030(d). Misuse of the discovery process includes failure to respond to an authorized method of discovery or disobeying a court order to provide discovery. Id., §§ 2023.010(d), (g). A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order dismissing part or all of the action. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(3).

  • Hearing

    Jan 30, 2017

ASUNCION CAZALES VS ZICONG FENG ET AL

The Court may impose a terminating sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., § 2023.030(d). Misuse of the discovery process includes failure to respond to an authorized method of discovery or disobeying a court order to provide discovery. Id., §§ 2023.010(d), (g). A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order dismissing part or all of the action. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(3).

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

PHYLLIS BARNETT VS WESTFIELD GROUP

The Court may impose a terminating sanction, issue sanction, or evidence sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., §§ 2023.030(d), 2023.030(b), 2023.030(c). Misuse of the discovery process includes failure to respond to an authorized method of discovery or making an evasive response to discovery. Id., §§ 2023.010(d), (e).

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2016

GINGER ORTIZ-STONE VS MARIANA GROSSO GONZALEZ ET AL

A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order striking out the pleadings in whole or in part, staying further proceedings by that party until an order for discovery is obeyed, dismissing part or all of the action, or rendering a judgment by default. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(1)-(4). “‘Only two facts are absolutely prerequisite to imposition of the sanction: (1) there must be a failure to comply … and (2) the failure must be willful.’” Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v.

  • Hearing

    May 08, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

RASHELL KHAN VS ARIA CAMARILLO ZUBER

A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order striking out the pleadings in whole or in part, staying further proceedings by that party until an order for discovery is obeyed, dismissing part or all of the action, or rendering a judgment by default. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(1)-(4). “‘Only two facts are absolutely prerequisite to imposition of the sanction: (1) there must be a failure to comply … and (2) the failure must be willful.’” Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v.

  • Hearing

    Apr 18, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

JOSEPHINE KOH VS TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION ET AL

A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order striking out the pleadings in whole or in part, staying further proceedings by that party until an order for discovery is obeyed, dismissing part or all of the action, or rendering a judgment by default. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(1)-(4). “‘Only two facts are absolutely prerequisite to imposition of the sanction: (1) there must be a failure to comply … and (2) the failure must be willful.’” Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2016

TAMMY BELL ET AL VS SERGIO MANZO

A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order striking out the pleadings in whole or in part, staying further proceedings by that party until an order for discovery is obeyed, dismissing part or all of the action, or rendering a judgment by default. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(1)-(4). “‘Only two facts are absolutely prerequisite to imposition of the sanction: (1) there must be a failure to comply … and (2) the failure must be willful.’” Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v.

  • Hearing

    Sep 20, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

YESENIA FLORES ET AL VS ROSE SANCHEZ ET AL

A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order striking out the pleadings in whole or in part, staying further proceedings by that party until an order for discovery is obeyed, dismissing part or all of the action, or rendering a judgment by default. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(1)-(4). “‘Only two facts are absolutely prerequisite to imposition of the sanction: (1) there must be a failure to comply … and (2) the failure must be willful.’” Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v.

  • Hearing

    Nov 01, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

THE ESTATE OF LEWIS NYARECHA VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

“If a monetary sanction is authorized . . . the court shall impose that sanction unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust.”

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

RYAN KING VS ROBERT ENGIDAWORK ET AL

A terminating sanction may be imposed by an order striking out the pleadings in whole or in part, staying further proceedings by that party until an order for discovery is obeyed, dismissing part or all of the action, or rendering a judgment by default. Id., §§ 2023.030(d)(1)-(4). “‘Only two facts are absolutely prerequisite to imposition of the sanction: (1) there must be a failure to comply … and (2) the failure must be willful.’” Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v.

  • Hearing

    Sep 15, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

HELEN LIM-SUK FUNG VS JAGUAR LAND ROVER

If that party then fails to obey an order compelling attendance, testimony, and production, the court may make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction. Id., § 2025.450(h). Sanctions shall not be imposed as punishment and must be tailored to the harm caused by the withheld discovery. Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc. (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 967, 992.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2017

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 13     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.