Rulings related to "Contra Costa County"

Get an alert with new cases related to: "Contra Costa County"

Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify whether decedent was a resident of Contra Costa County. It appears decedent was a resident of Alameda County. 2. Proof of Publication. PrC § 8120 3. Proof of mailing Notice of Petition to Administer Estate and copy of petition to all heirs. PrC § 8110; LR 7.151(e) 4. Verified declaration by petitioner to add deceased spouse with date of death to petition Item # 8. LR 7.151(d) DEL MARIE WASHINGTON JARRITTE T WASHINGTON GEORGE M DERIEG

  • Hearing

    Sep 04, 2018

Petition at ¶ 5 indicates day-to-day administration is conducted in Contra Costa County; however, petition at ¶ 10 indicates successor trustee resides in Minnesota. B. Per 12-7-17 m.o., court suspended Deborah Isabelle and appointed Elizabeth Soloway as temporary, successor trustee, with bond fixed at $750,000.00.

  • Hearing

    Sep 06, 2018

An attorney can be located through the lawyer referral service of the Contra Costa County Bar Association, (925) 825-5700.

  • Hearing

    Feb 22, 2019

Proof of residency in Contra Costa County. IKBAL KAUR RANDHAWA ALI YOUSEFI Need: 1. Original financial account statement(s) as required by PrC § 2620(c) (2), (3) 2. Original, closing escrow statement for sale of real property PrC§ 2620(c)(4) 3. Notice of Filing Inventory & Appraisal Form GC-042 filed and Proof of Service re: same PrC § 2610 4. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify whether annual photograph of conservatee has been taken pursuant to PrC § 2360 5.

  • Hearing

    Nov 01, 2019

HEARING ON DEMURRER TO 1st Amended COMPLAINT FILED BY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY * TENTATIVE RULING: * The unopposed demurrer is sustained, with 30 days leave to amend. The complaint fails to allege negligence with sufficient specificity, is uncertain, and does not allege compliance with the Government Claims Act. Defendant requests that the demurrer be sustained without leave to amend because plaintiff cannot allege compliance with the Government Claims Act.

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2020

Thus, here defendant must show (1) that Contra Costa County is not where the contract was made; (2) that Contra Costa County was not the residence of the defendants at the time the action was commenced; and (3) that there is no “special contract in writing” specifying defendant’s performance was to occur in Contra Costa County. Here, as noted, there is nothing in the contract specifying the location of performance.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

hearing. appearance required to determine whether San Francisco is the proper venue for this petition, given the trustee's residence being in Contra Costa County, and whether the case should be transferred there. Due to the COVID-19 emergency, counsel and parties must appear remotely through Zoom or CourtCall whenever possible. Please review the 9th amended general order on the court’s website for information on appearing remotely. For Zoom appearance: meeting ID is 875 8017 7925 and password is 722809.

  • Hearing

    Apr 19, 2021

  • Judge

    SANDRA HILTON

  • County

    San Francisco County, CA

Note: Petition does not address principal place of Administration of Trust, however, property is located in Contra Costa County ANTONIO P. TACALDO JR JAMES L. CONKEY THE 2007 VIRGINIA STERNBERG RE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to check box 6.d, cousins are issue of grandparents 2. Bond in the amount of $736,000.00 3. Proposed Order COLLEEN WEAVER PETER A HASS DEAN ALLISON

  • Hearing

    Jun 21, 2016

Defendant's request for judicial notice of the Order for Probate filed on October 13, 2013, with the Contra Costa County Superior Court for the Estate of Jerlyn L. Smith, the declaration of Mathew B. Talbot filed with the Contra Costa County Superior Court on March 10, 2016, concerning property of the Estate of Jerlyn L. Smith and the Jerlyn L.

  • Hearing

    Jun 28, 2016

.: BC718813 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT HILTON FRANCHISE HOLDING LLCS MOTION TO TRANSFER ACTION TO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. November 9, 2021 On August 22, 2018, plaintiff Mario Taylor filed this action against defendant Ashford TRS Walnut Creek LLC dba Walnut Creek Embassy Suites (erroneously sued as Embassy Suites) for negligence and premises liability.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2021

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Franklin Canyon Corporation is not the owner of the golf course where the underlying accident occurred and, besides the coincidence of its name, has no connection whatever with the underlying accident, which occurred in Contra Costa County. (Heringer v.

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

  • County

    San Francisco County, CA

He was not aware of any action pending in Contra Costa County. After being out of the office until June, he was advised by Mr. Nesheiwat that a default had been taken against him. Thus, he asserts, the failure to answer was due to his failure to ascertain the existence of the Contra Costa action and assure that a responsive pleading was filed. Plaintiff argues that this does not show an error by defense counsel, but that defendant gave his attorney incorrect information.

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2016

  • Judge

    Ed Weil

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

FILED ON 03/24/21 BY MELISSA STEELE Need: Verified declaration by petitioner to complete petition item 3.a(2) location of estate in Contra Costa County Will Contest filed 5-27-21 by Amanda Steele Competing petition filed 4-27-21 is set for hearing 7-6-21. Court will continue this matter to be heard at that time AMANDA STEELE KONSTANTINE A DEMIRIS MELISSA STEELE DAVID SIMON RETHA MAE STEELE Need: 1. Appearance to report status, including mediation 2.

  • Hearing

    May 27, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

The action is transferred to Contra Costa County. Plaintiff may file a motion to change venue based on the convenience of witnesses in that forum, but no such motion is pending in this county. Sanctions denied. Plaintiff did not act unreasonably. The prevailing party is required to bring a proposed order to the hearing even if the motion is not opposed or the tentative ruling is not contested.

  • Hearing

    Oct 24, 2011

There are no facts supporting Defendant's request for a change of venue to Contra Costa County Superior Court. =(302/HEK)

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2017

The will dated 6/22/18 identifies decedent as a resident of Clayton, CA, which is in Contra Costa County. The petition at ¶ 3.c fails to identify decedent's address at DOD. What was the decedent's domicile at the time of death? Paragraph 3(e) appears incorrectly completed. Paragraph 5(a)(3) or (4), (5) or (6), (7) or (8), and 5(b) need completions. Paragraphs 6 and 7 appear to be filled out by mistake.

  • Hearing

    Feb 13, 2019

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

In the alternative, the District suggests Contra Costa County Superior Court.

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2020

The parties concede that venue is proper in Contra Costa County pursuant to CCP Section 395, as a Defendant, Bass, is headquartered in Walnut Creek. It is also undisputed that no medical care which is the subject of this action ever occurred in Contra Costa County. The alleged medical negligence either took place in Tulare County, with Minnema’s subsequent care in San Francisco County. Defendants Dr.

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2019

Cole in the Contra Costa County action. The prevailing party is required to bring a proposed order to the hearing even if the motion is not opposed or the tentative ruling is not contested. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to [email protected] with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. =302/hek

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2011

HEARING ON DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT of RIVERO FILED BY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRIC * TENTATIVE RULING: * Before the Court is a demurrer to the complaint filed by defendant Contra Costa Fire Protection District (the "District"). Plaintiff concedes the demurrer has merit, and the District does not oppose Plaintiff being granted leave to amend. For the reasons set forth in the demurrer, the demurrer is sustained, with leave to amend.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2021

HEARING ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS FILED BY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION * TENTATIVE RULING: * Respondents Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association (“CCCERA”) and CCCERA’s Board of Retirement’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted with leave to amend.

  • Hearing

    Aug 30, 2018

  • Judge

    Steve K. Austin

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

They contend the accident occurred in Contra Costa County, and all of the defendants reside in Contra Costa County; they therefore conclude venue is improper in Los Angeles County and should be transferred to Contra Costa County. The motion is unopposed. The Court is concerned, however, about the proof of service of the moving papers.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

However, K Bali’s principal place of business is in Contra Costa County. Because plaintiffs allege the existence of a settlement agreement that contains a provision selecting Alameda County as the proper venue, the motion is granted.

  • Hearing

    Feb 20, 2019

HEARING ON DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT FILED BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA * TENTATIVE RULING: * On October 8, 2019 Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants City of Pittsburg, Contra Costa County, and the State of California alleging several causes of action related to injuries suffered in a fall at Highlands Ranch Park on Buchanan Road in the City of Pittsburg.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

In this case, Defendant has made no showing that the forum/venue selection clause is “unfair” or “unreasonable,” and the choice of Contra Costa County is permissible under the venue statutory scheme. The real property which is the subject of the parties’ partition dispute is located in Contra Costa County, and the Shared Equity Agreement was negotiated and signed in Contra Costa County.

  • Hearing

    May 29, 2019

0
Selected
 

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope