Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Judgment and Enter New Judgment or Grant New Trial Tentative ruling: Deny motion on the following grounds: a) Plaintiff failed to serve Defendant Mendocino County District Attorney; b) The motion is untimely. A judgment after court trial was filed on August 22, 2007. Notice of entry of judgment was filed and served on September 17, 2007.
The judgment was appealed to the First District Court of Appeal. The decision became final on February 11, 2009 when the remittitur issued from the Court of Appeal.
Hearing Date
September 28, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Judgment and Enter New Judgment or Grant New Trial Tentative ruling: Deny motion on the following grounds: a) Plaintiff failed to serve Defendant Mendocino County District Attorney; b) The motion is untimely. A judgment after court trial was filed on August 22, 2007. Notice of entry of judgment was filed and served on September 17, 2007.
The judgment was appealed to the First District Court of Appeal. The decision became final on February 11, 2009 when the remittitur issued from the Court of Appeal.