FL-18-001614 – RAMIREZ VS ORDONEZ
Attorney for Respondent’s Motion to Be Relieved—DENIED, without prejudice.
There is no proof of service as to the client or opposing counsel. Moreover, counsel’s declaration (MC-052) inconsistently alleges mail service and address confirmation by electronic mail. Merely demonstrating that notice was sent to the client’s last known address and was not returned or no electronic delivery failure message was received is not, by itself, sufficient to demonstrate that the address is current. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.1362(d)(1),(2).)
Hearing Date
January 31, 2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
FL-18-001614 – RAMIREZ VS ORDONEZ
Attorney for Respondent’s Motion to Be Relieved—DENIED, without prejudice.
There is no proof of service as to the client or opposing counsel. Moreover, counsel’s declaration (MC-052) inconsistently alleges mail service and address confirmation by electronic mail. Merely demonstrating that notice was sent to the client’s last known address and was not returned or no electronic delivery failure message was received is not, by itself, sufficient to demonstrate that the address is current. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.1362(d)(1),(2).)