Construction Co.
Due to an ongoing trial in Department Ten, the hearing on the motions for summary judgment, or
in the alternative, summary adjudication are CONTINUED on the Court’s own motion to
October 21, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Department Ten.
Defendant Howard S. Wright Construction Co.’s (“HSW”) request for judicial notice is
GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)
The Court declines to rule on objections directed to statements made in each parties’ separate
statements of undisputed facts. (HSW’s Objections nos. 1-8; the Regents of the University of
California’s Objections nos. 1-2.) These objections are not framed as objections to evidence, but
instead to individual undisputed material facts. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(b).)
The Regents of the University of California’s (“Regents”) evidentiary objections to the
declaration of Joseph Odom are OVERRULED. (Evid. Code, §§ 352, 702, 1200, 1400.)
The Court declines to rule on the Regents’ remaining objections and H
Hearing Date
October 13, 2016
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Construction Co.
Due to an ongoing trial in Department Ten, the hearing on the motions for summary judgment, or
in the alternative, summary adjudication are CONTINUED on the Court’s own motion to
October 21, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Department Ten.
Defendant Howard S. Wright Construction Co.’s (“HSW”) request for judicial notice is
GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)
The Court declines to rule on objections directed to statements made in each parties’ separate
statements of undisputed facts. (HSW’s Objections nos. 1-8; the Regents of the University of
California’s Objections nos. 1-2.) These objections are not framed as objections to evidence, but
instead to individual undisputed material facts. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(b).)
The Regents of the University of California’s (“Regents”) evidentiary objections to the
declaration of Joseph Odom are OVERRULED. (Evid. Code, §§ 352, 702, 1200, 1400.)
The Court declines to rule on the Regents’ remaining objections and H