LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT – SOUTHWEST DISTRICT
Honorable Gary Y. Tanaka
Department B
Tuesday – September 1, 2020
Calendar No. 4
PROCEEDINGS
Simon Whang v. Access Liquor, Inc., et al.
YC073166
Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Simon Whang; Cross-Defendants CCKSW Inc. and Suilik Quinteros’ Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment
TENTATIVE RULING
Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Simon Whang; Cross-Defendants CCKSW Inc. and Suilik Quinteros’ Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment is denied without prejudice.
First, the Court notes that Cross-Defendants made reference to CCP § 473(d) in their notice of motion. CCP § 473(d) states: “The court may, upon motion of the injured party, or its own motion, correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed, and may, on motion of either party after notice to the other party, set aside any void judgment or order.” Cross-Defendants made no arguments to support that the default judgment is void on
Hearing Date
September 01, 2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT – SOUTHWEST DISTRICT
Honorable Gary Y. Tanaka
Department B
Tuesday – September 1, 2020
Calendar No. 4
PROCEEDINGS
Simon Whang v. Access Liquor, Inc., et al.
YC073166
Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Simon Whang; Cross-Defendants CCKSW Inc. and Suilik Quinteros’ Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment
TENTATIVE RULING
Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Simon Whang; Cross-Defendants CCKSW Inc. and Suilik Quinteros’ Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment is denied without prejudice.
First, the Court notes that Cross-Defendants made reference to CCP § 473(d) in their notice of motion. CCP § 473(d) states: “The court may, upon motion of the injured party, or its own motion, correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed, and may, on motion of either party after notice to the other party, set aside any void judgment or order.” Cross-Defendants made no arguments to support that the default judgment is void on