Motion: Defendant Nick Pritchett’s Demurrer to First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Mane Arax
Tentative Ruling: To sustain Defendant Nick Pritchett’s Demurrer to First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Mane Arax without leave to amend.
If oral argument is requested, the hearing on this motion is continued to Tuesday, April 30, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 1.
Proof of service in the file indicates notice of the demurrer was adequate. No response to the demurrer has been filed.
Defendant Nick Pritchett contends plaintiff Mane Arax’s first amended complaint for fraud fails to state a cause of action because plaintiff failed to obtain an order permitting a cause of action for conspiracy against Pritchett as required by Civil Code section 1714.10. Here, the amended complaint alleges Pritchett and his and co-defendants, “jointly or otherwise, conspired together, assisted each other and implemented policies, and procedures to the detriment of Plaintiffs (sic).” Accordingly, the gravamen of t
Hearing Date
April 29, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Motion: Defendant Nick Pritchett’s Demurrer to First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Mane Arax
Tentative Ruling: To sustain Defendant Nick Pritchett’s Demurrer to First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Mane Arax without leave to amend.
If oral argument is requested, the hearing on this motion is continued to Tuesday, April 30, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 1.
Proof of service in the file indicates notice of the demurrer was adequate. No response to the demurrer has been filed.
Defendant Nick Pritchett contends plaintiff Mane Arax’s first amended complaint for fraud fails to state a cause of action because plaintiff failed to obtain an order permitting a cause of action for conspiracy against Pritchett as required by Civil Code section 1714.10. Here, the amended complaint alleges Pritchett and his and co-defendants, “jointly or otherwise, conspired together, assisted each other and implemented policies, and procedures to the detriment of Plaintiffs (sic).” Accordingly, the gravamen of t