Motions: (1) Demurrer by Defendants Dynamic Insurance Solutions, Inc., Dynamic Integrated Systems Solutions, Inc., and Troy Sibel to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint; and (2) Motion by Defendants Dynamic Insurance Solutions, Inc., Dynamic Integrated Systems Solutions, Inc. and Troy Sibel to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint
For purposes of assessing the sufficiency of a demurrer, the court is to assume the truth of all well-pleaded facts. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal. 3d 311, 318; CCP 430.30.) The court will accept as true all facts that may be implied or inferred from those alleged. (Marshall v. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher (1995) 37 Cal. App. 4th 1397, 1403.) The court “‘is to determine whether the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory.' [Citation.]" (Richelle L. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 257, 266.) To support a cause of action, a plaintiff must “allege in the complaint the essential facts with such partic