Motion: Motion by Defendants County of Tulare, Maggie Pruneda, Gary Kupfer and Mary Ann Cantu for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, for Summary Adjudication
Tentative Ruling: To deny the motion for summary judgment and to deny the alternative motions for summary adjudication as to all issues submitted.
Although noticed in a single motion, Defendants filed three different statements of undisputed facts and three supporting points and authorities divided as 1) Tulare County’s separate statement, 2) Pruneda’s separate statement, and 3) Cantu and Kupfer’s separate statement.
Plaintiff has filed opposition to each of the three statements of undisputed facts.
Plaintiff’s objections to the declarations of 1) John Mauro, 2) Gary Kupfer, 3) Mary Ann Cantu, 4) Maggie Pruneda, 5) Melissa Watson, 6) Juliet Webb, 7) Lizette Jimenez, 8) Kari Martin-Higgins, 9) Elisa Alanis, 10) Deanna Avey Motikeit, and 11) Maria Escarcega are overruled.
Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice is granted.
Def
Hearing Date
March 28, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Motion: Motion by Defendants County of Tulare, Maggie Pruneda, Gary Kupfer and Mary Ann Cantu for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, for Summary Adjudication
Tentative Ruling: To deny the motion for summary judgment and to deny the alternative motions for summary adjudication as to all issues submitted.
Although noticed in a single motion, Defendants filed three different statements of undisputed facts and three supporting points and authorities divided as 1) Tulare County’s separate statement, 2) Pruneda’s separate statement, and 3) Cantu and Kupfer’s separate statement.
Plaintiff has filed opposition to each of the three statements of undisputed facts.
Plaintiff’s objections to the declarations of 1) John Mauro, 2) Gary Kupfer, 3) Mary Ann Cantu, 4) Maggie Pruneda, 5) Melissa Watson, 6) Juliet Webb, 7) Lizette Jimenez, 8) Kari Martin-Higgins, 9) Elisa Alanis, 10) Deanna Avey Motikeit, and 11) Maria Escarcega are overruled.
Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice is granted.
Def