CITIZENS OF HUMANITY, LLC v. NICK LACY, et al.
CASE NO.: VC066228
HEARING: 07/30/2020
JUDGE: OLIVIA ROSALES
#9
TENATIVE ORDER
Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate Case Nos. VC066228 and 20LBCP00044 is GRANTED.
Moving Party to give Notice.
Plaintiff Citizens of Humanity, LLC. (Plaintiff) moves to consolidate case nos. VC066228 and 20LBCP00044 per CCP § 1048 for purposes of trial only. No opposition was filed.
Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1048, subs. (a), “When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.”
Consolidation of actions is not a matter of right but rests within sound discretion of the trial judge, and his decision will not be reviewed except upon clear showing of abuse of di
Type
Other Commercial/Business Tort (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
CITIZENS OF HUMANITY, LLC v. NICK LACY, et al.
CASE NO.: VC066228
HEARING: 07/30/2020
JUDGE: OLIVIA ROSALES
#9
TENATIVE ORDER
Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate Case Nos. VC066228 and 20LBCP00044 is GRANTED.
Moving Party to give Notice.
Plaintiff Citizens of Humanity, LLC. (Plaintiff) moves to consolidate case nos. VC066228 and 20LBCP00044 per CCP § 1048 for purposes of trial only. No opposition was filed.
Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1048, subs. (a), “When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.”
Consolidation of actions is not a matter of right but rests within sound discretion of the trial judge, and his decision will not be reviewed except upon clear showing of abuse of di