Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party
(Subscribe to View)
August 18, 2016
Los Angeles County, CA
Other Commercial/Business Tort (General Jurisdiction)
ACEVEDO VICTOR (DOE 11) - Defendant, & Defendant in Pro Per
EMILY'S BRIDAL A BUSINESS ENTITY - Defendant, & Defendant in Pro Per
PETTIS ZIMMER LLP - Attorney for Plaintiff
PINEDA GERBACIO - Plaintiff
Mar 09, 2017
Nov 29, 2016
PINEDA v. TRC INVESTMENTS LLC CASE NO.: VC065033 HEARING: 08/18/16 JUDGE: M. BERNAL #8 TENTATIVE ORDER Specially-appearing defendant VICTOR ACEVEDO’s motion to quash service is DENIED. C.C.P. § 418.10. Defendant has 20 days to serve and file a responsive pleading. Plaintiff GERBACIO PINEDA filed the subject complaint in September 2015. On April 26, 2016, plaintiff filed an Amendment naming the moving defendant as Doe 11. According to the proof of service (filed 06/16/16), defendant Acevedo was served by way of substituted service on June 3, 2016. He seeks to quash service on the ground that the April 2016 Amendment was not served along with the summons and complaint. See Acevedo decl. In opposition, plaintiff contests that fact, and argues that he is entitled to a rebuttable presumption that service, effected by a registered process server, is valid. Evid. Code §647.
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Please wait a moment while we gather your results.