MMC CAPITAL FUND v. CASTLE CAPITAL PARTNERS NO. 2
CASE NO.: VC064466
HEARING: 07/02/2020
#6
TENTATIVE ORDER
Defendants BANK OF HOPE; SEONG JIN PARK; MR SOLOMON INVESTMENTS, LLC; TOP PRIORTIES CORPORATION; TZO HARVARD LLC; MICHAEL CHANG; and CASTLE CAPITAL PARTNERS NO. 2, LLC’s demurrer to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint is OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to Defendants PARK and Defendant BANK OF HOPE in part. CCP §430.10(e).
Moving Party to Give Notice.
Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED as to the existence of the documents, but not as to any hearsay statements contained therein. Cal. Ev. Code §452.
This action was filed by Plaintiffs on December 11, 2014. The relevant facts, as alleged, are as follows: “Defendant Chang has wrongfully exerted control over up to $750,000 of partnership funds located in the partnership’s bank accounts without any intent to provide Plaintiffs their appropriate share.” (TAC ¶73.) “Park and Bank of Hope h
Type
Other Real Property Rights Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
MMC CAPITAL FUND v. CASTLE CAPITAL PARTNERS NO. 2
CASE NO.: VC064466
HEARING: 07/02/2020
#6
TENTATIVE ORDER
Defendants BANK OF HOPE; SEONG JIN PARK; MR SOLOMON INVESTMENTS, LLC; TOP PRIORTIES CORPORATION; TZO HARVARD LLC; MICHAEL CHANG; and CASTLE CAPITAL PARTNERS NO. 2, LLC’s demurrer to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint is OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to Defendants PARK and Defendant BANK OF HOPE in part. CCP §430.10(e).
Moving Party to Give Notice.
Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED as to the existence of the documents, but not as to any hearsay statements contained therein. Cal. Ev. Code §452.
This action was filed by Plaintiffs on December 11, 2014. The relevant facts, as alleged, are as follows: “Defendant Chang has wrongfully exerted control over up to $750,000 of partnership funds located in the partnership’s bank accounts without any intent to provide Plaintiffs their appropriate share.” (TAC ¶73.) “Park and Bank of Hope h