Defense Motion to Bifurcate Punitives: Granted.
Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Administrative Duties: Denied. Not unduly prejudicial. Provides context and explanation of the custom and habit between Plaintiff and her employer.
Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Irrelevant and Unduly Prejudicial Evidence: The NSF check was written in November, 2011. While it goes to her credibility, almost 6 years have gone by. The court weighs probative and prejudicial facts and exercises its discretion and excludes evidence of the bad check.
Plaintiff's Motion in Limine re the Binding Effect of the Court's prior ruling: The prior ruling stands. It is not subject to further presentation of evidence or argument. It is deemed to be binding Law of the Case.
Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Witnesses: Granted, except for the parties or a Defendant representative or an expert listening to the testimony of another expert.
Plaintiff's Motion re Spoilation and Suppression: If Plaintiff feels that evidence has been
Hearing Date
October 13, 2017
Type
Other Employment Complaint (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Defense Motion to Bifurcate Punitives: Granted.
Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Administrative Duties: Denied. Not unduly prejudicial. Provides context and explanation of the custom and habit between Plaintiff and her employer.
Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Irrelevant and Unduly Prejudicial Evidence: The NSF check was written in November, 2011. While it goes to her credibility, almost 6 years have gone by. The court weighs probative and prejudicial facts and exercises its discretion and excludes evidence of the bad check.
Plaintiff's Motion in Limine re the Binding Effect of the Court's prior ruling: The prior ruling stands. It is not subject to further presentation of evidence or argument. It is deemed to be binding Law of the Case.
Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Witnesses: Granted, except for the parties or a Defendant representative or an expert listening to the testimony of another expert.
Plaintiff's Motion re Spoilation and Suppression: If Plaintiff feels that evidence has been