19-3100 Discover Bank MSJ 7/14/2020
Plaintiff Discover Bank moves for Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Summary Adjudication in this debt collection matter against Defendant Jorge Tellez. Having read and considered the motion, opposition, and reply, the court issues the following tentative ruling:
Judicial Notice. Plaintiff requests the court take judicial notice of 15 U.S.C. 1666 and 12 CFR 202.12. The court takes judicial notice of both pursuant to Evid. Code §§451(a) and 452(b).
The Motion for Summary Adjudication is denied as to each cause of action. The Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.
Judicial Notice. Plaintiff requests the court take judicial notice of 15 U.S.C. 1666 and 12 CFR 202.12. The court takes judicial notice of both pursuant to Evid. Code §§451(a) and 452(b).
Evidentiary Objections. Defendant makes several evidentiary objections. Each objection is overruled. With regard to each objection, Defendant is objecting to Plaintiff’s UMFs, not evid
Hearing Date
July 08, 2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
19-3100 Discover Bank MSJ 7/14/2020
Plaintiff Discover Bank moves for Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Summary Adjudication in this debt collection matter against Defendant Jorge Tellez. Having read and considered the motion, opposition, and reply, the court issues the following tentative ruling:
Judicial Notice. Plaintiff requests the court take judicial notice of 15 U.S.C. 1666 and 12 CFR 202.12. The court takes judicial notice of both pursuant to Evid. Code §§451(a) and 452(b).
The Motion for Summary Adjudication is denied as to each cause of action. The Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.
Judicial Notice. Plaintiff requests the court take judicial notice of 15 U.S.C. 1666 and 12 CFR 202.12. The court takes judicial notice of both pursuant to Evid. Code §§451(a) and 452(b).
Evidentiary Objections. Defendant makes several evidentiary objections. Each objection is overruled. With regard to each objection, Defendant is objecting to Plaintiff’s UMFs, not evid