SS026757
Petitioner’s Petition to Quash Deposition Subpoena is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The document requests are limited to 2014 to 2016. The subpoena seeks relevant information. To the extent any documents are being withheld based on privilege or privacy, a privilege log should be provided identifying these documents.
ANALYSIS: Petitioner filed this action to quash the deposition subpoena on several procedural and substantive grounds. First, Petitioner argues this Court lacks jurisdiction to issue a deposition subpoena for documents in connection with the Wisconsin action involving Doane, Theatre Building LLC and Orpheum Management, LLC and Paras. Petitioner contends the same documents sought in the subpoena were sought from Paras in the Wisconsin action, and he refused to produce them. Petitioner argues that Doane, et al. should have moved to compel responses from Paras in the Wisconsin action rather than serve Petitioner with a deposition subpoena for the leases it has
Hearing Date
August 25, 2017
Type
Civil Petition - Other (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SS026757
Petitioner’s Petition to Quash Deposition Subpoena is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The document requests are limited to 2014 to 2016. The subpoena seeks relevant information. To the extent any documents are being withheld based on privilege or privacy, a privilege log should be provided identifying these documents.
ANALYSIS: Petitioner filed this action to quash the deposition subpoena on several procedural and substantive grounds. First, Petitioner argues this Court lacks jurisdiction to issue a deposition subpoena for documents in connection with the Wisconsin action involving Doane, Theatre Building LLC and Orpheum Management, LLC and Paras. Petitioner contends the same documents sought in the subpoena were sought from Paras in the Wisconsin action, and he refused to produce them. Petitioner argues that Doane, et al. should have moved to compel responses from Paras in the Wisconsin action rather than serve Petitioner with a deposition subpoena for the leases it has