On August 14, 2017, Plaintiffs Mark Pennacchio and Sheri Pennacchio (“Plaintiffs”) filed the complaint in this action against defendants Ken Medrano, individually and dba Kendell Brook Builders, Jack Shapiro, Shapiro Plastering, Inc. and various sureties (altogether “Defendants”) for construction defects arising out of work done on Plaintiffs’ property at 3291 Mariola, Sebastopol (the “Property”). The Complaint contains causes of action for: 1) negligence; 2) breach of contract; 3) breach of implied warranties; 4) – 5) breach of express warranty; and 6) – 7) claim on contractor’s license bond (against the sureties). The Complaint alleges that Plaintiffs entered into an Owners Contract Agreement with Defendant Ken Medrano, individually and dba Kendell Brook Builders (“Defendant Medrano”), and that as part of the work to be completed, Defendant Medrano retained Jack Shapiro and Shapiro Plastering, Inc. (the “Shapiro Defendants”) as a subcontractor. Defendant Medrano filed a cross-complai
Hearing Date
February 27, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
On August 14, 2017, Plaintiffs Mark Pennacchio and Sheri Pennacchio (“Plaintiffs”) filed the complaint in this action against defendants Ken Medrano, individually and dba Kendell Brook Builders, Jack Shapiro, Shapiro Plastering, Inc. and various sureties (altogether “Defendants”) for construction defects arising out of work done on Plaintiffs’ property at 3291 Mariola, Sebastopol (the “Property”). The Complaint contains causes of action for: 1) negligence; 2) breach of contract; 3) breach of implied warranties; 4) – 5) breach of express warranty; and 6) – 7) claim on contractor’s license bond (against the sureties). The Complaint alleges that Plaintiffs entered into an Owners Contract Agreement with Defendant Ken Medrano, individually and dba Kendell Brook Builders (“Defendant Medrano”), and that as part of the work to be completed, Defendant Medrano retained Jack Shapiro and Shapiro Plastering, Inc. (the “Shapiro Defendants”) as a subcontractor. Defendant Medrano filed a cross-complai