Motion for Summary Adjudication
Rulings on Objections to Evidence
Defendants’ objections to evidence are ruled on as follows: Objection No. 14 is sustained. The remaining objections are overruled.
Plaintiffs’ objections to evidence are ruled on as follows: Objection Nos. 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 are sustained. The remaining objections are overruled. Ruling on Motion
Plaintiffs Coast Cryo, Inc. and Ryan Zierman move for summary adjudication as to their fifth cause of action for violation of the California Franchise Investment Law (“CFIL”) and seventh cause of action for violation of the Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). A plaintiff may move for summary adjudication if it contends that there is no affirmative defense to one or more causes of action alleged in the complaint. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(f)(1). A moving plaintiff has the initial burden of showing that there is no defense to a cause of action. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(p)(1). If plaintiff meets its initi
Hearing Date
February 05, 2019
Type
Contract: Breach Cont/Warranty (06)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Motion for Summary Adjudication
Rulings on Objections to Evidence
Defendants’ objections to evidence are ruled on as follows: Objection No. 14 is sustained. The remaining objections are overruled.
Plaintiffs’ objections to evidence are ruled on as follows: Objection Nos. 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 are sustained. The remaining objections are overruled. Ruling on Motion
Plaintiffs Coast Cryo, Inc. and Ryan Zierman move for summary adjudication as to their fifth cause of action for violation of the California Franchise Investment Law (“CFIL”) and seventh cause of action for violation of the Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). A plaintiff may move for summary adjudication if it contends that there is no affirmative defense to one or more causes of action alleged in the complaint. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(f)(1). A moving plaintiff has the initial burden of showing that there is no defense to a cause of action. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(p)(1). If plaintiff meets its initi