Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party
Craig G. Riemer
(Subscribe to View)
Track Rulings In Case
August 24, 2020
Riverside County, CA
Karas Vs Tumbrello
Alvarez Vs Zook
Bobst Vs Corporate Alliance Strategies Inc
Feodorov Vs. Bartoli
Tuliau Vs The Kroger Co.
Mendoza Vs Nissan North America Inc
Baker Vs Temecula Valley
West Coast Yamaha Vs Arehart
Duron Vs Wilcox
Wood Vs Zazueta
The motion of Celestine Barnes to vacate the judgment is denied. Analysis: The 22-page memorandum supporting the motion fails to comply with the page limitations prescribed by California Rules of Court, rule 3.1113(d), and fails to provide the table of contents and table of authorities required by rule 3.1113(e). On the merits, all of these issues have been exhaustively litigated in the context of Celestine Barnes’s numerous objections to the proposed statement of decision. The authorities presented appear to be the same authorities on which Celestine Barnes relied previously. The Court is not persuaded that there is any merit to any of the claims.
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.