The Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED, however, the truth of matters asserted in such documents is not necessarily subject to judicial notice. Statute of Limitations and Delayed Discovery The parties do not dispute that the limitations period for the claims contained in the Complaint (interference with contract claims) is governed by CCP § 339(1) which is two years from the date of the wrongful act which could not be later than the actual breach of contract by the person who was wrongfully induced. However, Plaintiff contends he did not have the opportunity to discover the facts until 2/23/18 as stated in his Complaint. The “discovery rule” is an exception to the general rule that an action accrues when appreciable harm occurs. (Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery (2005) 35 Cal.4th 797, 807.) The discovery rule only Page 9 of 11 delays accrual until the plaintiff has, or should have, inquiry notice of the cause of action, i.e., “plaintiffs are required to conduct a reasonable investigatio