Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues
Craig G. Riemer Track Judge
(Subscribe to View) Track Rulings In Case
June 5, 2020
Riverside County, CA
1
Civil
Oct 07, 2019
Leon Vs Wal-Mart
Viva Capital Funding Llc Vs Revive Medical Llc
Yopp Vs Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Walsh Vs The Chopper Gallery, Inc
Carmichael Vs Cafe Sevilla Of Riverside Inc
Cummings Vs Department Of Motor Vehicles
Haynes Vs San Jacinto Villas
Highstreet Vs Hyundai Motor America
Hartson Vs Sakamoto
Opportunity Vs Commercial Solar
The hearing on the petition for writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory relief has been continued to May 15, 2020, at 1:30 P.M., and may be continued further. In the meantime, the Court issues the following tentative ruling. LEGAL BACKGROUND As enacted by the passage of Proposition 218 in 1996, article XIII C of the California Constitution provides that “[a]ll taxes imposed by any local government shall be deemed to be either general taxes or special taxes.” (Cal. Const., art. XIII C, § 2, subd. (a).) Local governments may not impose, increase or extend (a) any general tax unless it has been approved by a majority vote at a general election, or (b) any special tax, unless it has been approved by a two-thirds vote of the electorate. (Id., subd. (b) & (d).) Proposition 218 did not define “tax.” That omission was cured when article XIII C, section 1, was amended by the passage of Proposition 26 in 2010. Proposition 26 added subdivision (e) to that section. Subdiv........
Your alert tracking was succesfully added. We will email you when new changes related to are available.
You can see and mange all your Tracking alerts under Alert Settings
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
PARADA VS CITY OF RIVERSIDE
Case No.: RIC1818642