The Court grants Tyler Mall’s unopposed motion to seal, in part. The concern the Court has with Tyler Mall’s motion is the scope of the relief requested, which is to essentially seal without any redactions the entire motion, opposition, exhibits, etc. filed in this matter. California Rules of Court, Rule 2.550(d) provides that the court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it expressly finds facts that establish: 1) There exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to the record; 2) The overriding interest supports sealing the record; 3) A substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; 4) The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and 5) No less restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest. Tyler Mall has identified 18 categories that it believes are subject to sealing pursuant to the Confidentiality Protective Order, which are listed on pages 7-8 of its moving papers.