Denied. Triable issues of fact exist.
This SAC for 1. Sexual Harassment ( Cal. Gov. Code § 12900, Et Seq.); 2. Sexual Harassment (Gov. Code §12900, Et Seq.); 3. Retaliation ( Cal. Gov. Code 12940, Et Seq.); 4. Wrongful Discharge in Violation of Public Policy (Cal. Gov. Code § 12940, Et Seq.); 5. Failure to Prevent Harassment And Retaliation (Cal. Gov. Code 12940, Et Seq.); 6. Disparate Treatment (Cal.Gov. Code §12940, Et Seq.); 7. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; 8. Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress; 9. Sexual Battery; 10. Sexual Assault; 11. Negligent Hiring, Supervision, Or Retention of Employee; 12. Failure to Provide Personnel File (Cal. Gov. Code 1198. 5); And 13. Knowing and Intentional Failure to Comply With Itemized Employee Wage Statement Provisions Lab. Code § 226) Penalties under Labor Code § 2699 arises out of Plaintiff’s alleged joint employment with the corporate Defendants and with Denise Wilson.
The motion is based upon the grounds that there is
Hearing Date
December 16, 2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Denied. Triable issues of fact exist.
This SAC for 1. Sexual Harassment ( Cal. Gov. Code § 12900, Et Seq.); 2. Sexual Harassment (Gov. Code §12900, Et Seq.); 3. Retaliation ( Cal. Gov. Code 12940, Et Seq.); 4. Wrongful Discharge in Violation of Public Policy (Cal. Gov. Code § 12940, Et Seq.); 5. Failure to Prevent Harassment And Retaliation (Cal. Gov. Code 12940, Et Seq.); 6. Disparate Treatment (Cal.Gov. Code §12940, Et Seq.); 7. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; 8. Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress; 9. Sexual Battery; 10. Sexual Assault; 11. Negligent Hiring, Supervision, Or Retention of Employee; 12. Failure to Provide Personnel File (Cal. Gov. Code 1198. 5); And 13. Knowing and Intentional Failure to Comply With Itemized Employee Wage Statement Provisions Lab. Code § 226) Penalties under Labor Code § 2699 arises out of Plaintiff’s alleged joint employment with the corporate Defendants and with Denise Wilson.
The motion is based upon the grounds that there is