Mark C. Kim
(Subscribe to View)
November 19, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Quiet Title (General Jurisdiction)
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Conditional Settlement) 07/16/2019
ALBERTSON STEWART RICHARD - Attorney for Plaintiff
INDIV MARIA JOAQUINA LOPEZ - - Plaintiff
INDIV. ISELA LOPEZ - - Defendant
INDIV. RODRIGO LOPEZ - - Plaintiff
SENIOR MARK MILNOR - Attorney for Defendant
Kristin Hirai, Et Al. Vs Skating Edge Ice Arena, Et Al.
Armanak Bagramyan Vs Siamak Kalhor Et Al
Justin Morgenthaler Et Al Vs Juan Antonio Haromartinez Et Al
Eugene Shampansky Et Al Vs Oceans 11 Rv Park Llc
Atiz Innovation Company Limited, A Foreign Company Vs Nicholas Warnock, Et Al.
Velma Mcelroy Et Al Vs Little Company Of Mary Et Al
Katelyn Sanchez Vs City Of Long Beach Et Al
Margaret Williams Et Al Vs Long Beach Unified School Distric
Four Column Investment Llc Vs Rose Unknown, Et Al.
Creative Recovery Concepts Inc Vs Leroy James Collins, Iii, Et Al.
Plaintiffs Maria de Lopez and Rodrigo Lopez, acting in propria persona moves the court to reconsider the court’s denial of her previous motion for reconsideration on August 2, 2019. The relief Plaintiff seeks is vacating a judgment pursuant to a settlement agreement of June 27, 2019. At that time all parties were represented by counsel. Plaintiffs’ counsel subsequently withdrew by noticed motion. Plaintiffs acknowledge that their initial motion for reconsideration was denied on August 3, 2019. That was an ex parte motion, and the court invited Plaintiffs to file a noticed motion. Motions for reconsideration are governed by CCP §1008 and its requirements are jurisdictional – i.e. the court cannot grant relief unless the statutory requirements are met. This is to prevent successive motions on the same issue unless there are either new facts which could not have been presented earlier or a change in law. CCP §1008: “(a) When an........
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Please wait a moment while we gather your results.