HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

FILED BY HENKEL CORPORATION

* TENTATIVE RULING: *

The motion for summary adjudication filed by defendant Henkel Corporation is denied. Factual issues exist regarding the Eighth Cause of Action, for failure to engage in an interactive process, and Ninth Cause of Action, for retaliation. (Undisputed Material Fact No. 7, Disputed Material Fact (“DMF”) Nos. 7, 8, 10; Plaintiff’s Additional Fact (“PAF”) Nos. 2-10, 14, 15, 16, 19, 21, 28, 29-34, 36, 37-40, 44-59, 61-65,75 78-81, 84-88, 90, 91, 100, 108; Pltf’s Ex. A, Malzahn Depo., at 98:1-10; 177:6-10; 178:13-179:2; Pltf’s Ex. B, MacCaskie Depo., at 96:16-97:2; Pltf’s Ex. D, Bunes Depo., at 131:25-132:20; Pltf’s Ex. E, Glasper Depo., at 45:3-15; 46:15-25; 50:20- 51:9; Pltf’s Ex. G and/or Ex. A to Isvoranu Decl., Haywood Depo., at 86:9-17; 219:21-220:4; 220-225, 228, 231:16; 232:13-15; 234:21-236:3; 237:7-20; 238:1-14; Pltf’s Ex. H, Morris Depo., at 42:15-45:15; 46:2-25; Pltf’s Ex. I, Dominguez,